Saturday, 22 August, 2009, 12:00am
As Victor Fung Keung pointed out in the Observer column ('A person has the right to a dignified death', August 18), most people object to euthanasia without thinking about the subject in a rational way.
They ignore the fact that someone who is terminally ill will not get better. And they are indifferent to the suffering and mental anguish that these patients endure. It is cowardly to ignore the excruciating pain they suffer before dying. People opposed to euthanasia banish thoughts of their loved ones ever facing such pain.
There are those who attempt to take the moral high ground, saying a life should not be ended in this way under any circumstances.
We have to face the issue of euthanasia. We must address it now, not just because of the pleas of the quadriplegic Choi Wan-fung ('Quadriplegic thinks about how to kill himself every day', August 16), but also because it is simply inhumane to stand idly by while people die in extreme pain.
The government and legislators should have the courage to reform the law on euthanasia.
Ko King-tim, Kowloon Tong
I do not agree with Victor Fung Keung's article ('A person has the right to a dignified death', August 18). I think a person has the right to a dignified life and that there is no dignity in death.
I disagree with the promoters of euthanasia, because people choose to die, not through free will, but under pressure, mostly from family members. You reported on the plight of quadriplegic Choi Wan-fung. If I was in a situation where I felt I had become a financial burden to my wife or my children, I would want to opt to die. That is why the present law exists, to protect me, not to encourage me to commit suicide. At the same time, a civil society should provide the means for someone in that state to be able to lead a dignified life.
Mr Fung says that 'dying with dignity is humane' but how does he know? As Hamlet says, that is 'the undiscovered country'. A friend of mine died last year of cancer at 53. He was in great pain, but just a few days before dying, and in spite of suffering, lying in his garden he explained to me how overwhelmed he was by the beauty of flowers.
Angelo Paratico, Sheung Wan
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Different people, operating under different viewpoints, maintain diverse beliefs regarding the issue of euthanasia. While some, such as the Buddhists, have more fluid beliefs toward medically-assisted death, others, such as the Catholics, remain firmly opposed. Personally, I agree with the Catholic Church’s perspective on euthanasia. While I know I am not in the position to preach understanding of the pains associated with certain terminal illnesses, I firmly believe that all life, even a life of suffering, is precious and purposeful. As humans are not the true origin of life, neither should we choose when to end our lives. Buddhism suggests that one can become enlightened enough to choose to end their life, but as we were never involved in our initial creation, such enlightenment would be impossible. Patients such as Brittany Maynard seek to end their lives with dignity, as opposed to dying in pain and agony, but death is not meant to be dignified. As our life on earth ends, we should be humbled and fully realize our dependence on God. While I remain open-minded to the reasoning behind euthanasia, my current perspective does not morally support…
- 1030 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable disease which is cutting a person’s life too short. The concept of physician assisted suicide always provokes a moral predicament for many people all over the world, mostly because it gives someone the freedom to choose whether to live or die. Euthanasia has been debated for many years, on one hand people believe euthanasia is a negative action because suicide is not a way out, but on the other hand people also believe assisted suicide is the only option for a patient who suffers from great pain that will only get worse. Euthanasia or physician assisted suicide should be legalized and people shouldn’t worry about whether or not if they feel it’s immoral or not.…
- 2132 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Not everyone has the ability to control whether they have a peaceful death or not. Dr. Philip Nitschke, pro-euthanasia activist and author of “Euthanasia: Hope You Never Need It, but Be Glad the Option Is There,” feels it is every human’s right to have a serene death. The primary goal of the article is to promote the idea that denying one the ability to die peacefully, excluding those under the age of 18 and with mental illnesses, is unethical. The author firmly believes there should be laws in place to prevent people with terminal illnesses from having to suffer through the pain of an agonizing death with no option to end their life with assisted suicide. Throughout the article, Dr. Nitschke shares logical reasons, examples, and current events surrounding the issue of euthanasia.…
- 676 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia the assisted killing of a terminal patient is a controversial topic that medical professionals cannot avoid. Many health professionals face the ethical dilemma of whether or not they should end a patient’s misery. Patient’s rights are always the top priority, doctors are taught to find every possible way to treat and cure the patient, but the possibility of the patient being irremediable to what extent is the health care professionals willing to go to give the patient their wishes?…
- 920 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia not only gives the patient the opportunity to stop their suffering, it also gives them autonomy. According to Thomas Preston, professor of medicine, a retired cardiologist and a former board member of Compassion in Dying “society must protect the right of terminally ill patients to choose euthanasia.” (Euthanasia 53) By euthanasia being legal, we have been unconsciously giving the patient the autonomy of whether they want to continue living or not. We as human beings can only perceive the outside of a person, however, we could never really know what they may be going through or suffering. Sometimes, individuals are so self-centered that would prefer to have their loved ones alive and in pain than giving them the freedom to choose between life and death. After all, each person is the owner of his or her life and should be able to decide what is best for them.…
- 1203 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
I believe that euthanasia has its place in society. While I do not condone murder, I believe if a person is dying from an incurable disease or is in a persistent vegetative state where there is no chance of recovery, allowing that person to die painlessly and with dignity is more moral than not doing so. Although human life is a precious gift from God, I feel that it would be the duty of the patients ' family and doctors to take all the information about the health of the patient and make the best decision for their loved one, even if the end result means the death of that person.…
- 882 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
When the topic of euthanasia is discussed many people emphasis on the pain that the patient may be in, but what a patient thinks about their quality of life is often more important.…
- 310 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The BBC wrote in an Aug. 3, 2009 online article titled "Religion & Ethics - Christianity: Euthanasia - the Christian View" on www.bbc.co.uk:…
- 1310 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Good Afternoon fellow, today I would like to express my thoughts on euthanasia. You might think to yourself, what is that? Well, that is what I thought, until I had watched a T.V documentary last year.…
- 822 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia is defined as the act or practice of ending the life of an individual suffering from a terminal illness or an incurable condition, as by lethal injection or the suspension of extraordinary medical treatment but the questions still remains is euthanasia considered murder?. The decision against euthanasia was influence by many facts that euthanasia may not always be voluntary many patients are usualy unable to speak on whether they want to end their lives or keep on living. Everybody is entitled to their own opinion the counter arguement morally wrong it is believed that hospitals are over crowded and euthanasia should be used to make room for other patients. My position is valid because it is unethical to assist a person on suicide there are many other options and medications with the new medical advances. There are also no aspects of the U.S. Constitution that give citizens the right to kill. Every one is entitled to determine their own judgement.…
- 911 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Euthanasia has become a topic for debate ever since Oregon legalized it in 1994(Time). Euthanasia can help people who are in tremendous pain by giving them a choice at ending it all in a painless manner. At the same time insurance companies will be saving millions of dollars every year for those people who do choose to. In Oregon is has been proven that euthanasia by a physician has had little abuse to come from the law being passed with all of the requirements being set in place before it is allowed to happen. (Time) Understandably some would oppose this simply because it is taking some one’s life is involved which some people will oppose no matter what. It also goes against others religion which is also understandable as to why they would oppose it. At the same time who are we to say that some one can not take their own life no matter how much pain they are in. That even though they are going to die soon any way and that everyone knows it that they have to just lay there in pain after the pain killers stop working and just wait for the end.…
- 2191 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Euthanasia has been a controversial topic of many debates for the past couple of decades. Oxford American Dictionary defines euthanasia as “the painless killing of a patient, suffering from an incurable disease” (Oxford, 273). In other words, euthanasia is a merciful killing of a person who is brain dead or terminally ill. Killing is a crime. But would it be a crime, if a person wishes to die? Voluntary euthanasia can be defined as the person asking someone to take his/her life. Most of the world sees euthanasia as an illegal act. “There are only three states in America which legalized euthanasia: Oregon, Washington and Montana. [Legalization is possible only under limited conditions:]…
- 1034 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The first problem with legalizing Euthanasia is it promotes abuse. The abuse can be seen in the Netherlands. In 1990, 1030 Dutch patients were killed without their consent. More than 12% of these patients were mentally competent but were not consulted at all. These deaths were essentially murders, and since Euthanasia is legal in the Netherlands, these deaths went, and will go, unpunished. The abuse of the Dutch system also extends to lethal injections of disabled babies. Babies cannot give permission to take their own lives, yet 8% of all infant mortalities in Holland occur from Euthanasia.…
- 679 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Other terms for "euthanasia" are "assisted suicide" and "mercy killing." There are no real causes of euthanasia, but there are reasons why people might resort to it. Some people, like Dr. Jack Kevorkian, who was imprisoned for assisting in suicides, believe that to prolong the suffering of a terminally ill person is immoral and the dying person should be the one to decide when it is time for his or her life to end. Other people, like Michael Schiavo, who won the right to remove the feeding tube that was the only thing keeping his severely brain-damaged wife Terry alive, believe that whether there is pain or not, when someone is in a vegetative state and is unaware of his or her surroundings, it is inhumane to keep that person living.…
- 820 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Next, Euthanasia may release patients from pain but it is palliative which cannot solve the problem at its source. Actually, many terminally ill patients can still survive finally. With the advanced medical development, it is possible that we can find out new therapies to turn terminally to non-terminally. Therefore, the legalization of Euthanasia which let patients choose to die at ease is to deprive the chance of being cured by new therapies of patients in the future.…
- 250 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays