Preview

Equity: Trust Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
831 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Equity: Trust Law
Equity and Trusts Law Essays and Dissertations
Law Essays UK proudly present a major breakthrough in the advancement of educational standards in the UK - the worlds first and only guaranteed 2:1 and First Standard quality personalised law essays service. Ever struggled with understanding a law essay or dissertation topic? Having difficulty with your equity essays or trusts essays? All our UK equity and trusts law essays and our equity and trusts law dissertations are custom written and are written specifically to your exact question. All equity essays and trusts essays and dissertations are also fully referenced (including complete bibliography) and are plagiarism software scanned.
Are you confused by the three certainties test in Knight v Knight? Or maybe constructive trusts and resulting trusts, or the difference between inferred common intention and express common intention trusts, as decided in Lloyds Bank v Rosset? Do all of these areas of equity and trusts law make full and complete sense to you? Chattels, cohabitees, charities, cy pres, discretionary trusts, express trusts, fixed trusts, donees, estoppel - (promissory and proprietary) easements, the formalities requirements for trusts and fiduciary duties? Are you fully compus mentus with regards to knowing receipt, knowing assistance, legatees, mutual wills, nominees, overreaching, overriding, perpetuities, powers, precatory trusts, probate, protective and quistclose trusts, settlors, succession, testators, trusteeship, equitable remedies, the equitable maxims, and the Vandervell legislation?
If not our equity and trusts law experts are ready to assist you on all equity and trusts law modules found on the LLB with any equity essays or trusts essays you may have.

Equity and Trusts - The Different Types of Trusts
Law Essays UK writers have addressed the following topics with trusts essays within this area - the difference between express and implied trusts, charitable trusts, consequences of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ciro T, Symes C, Corporations Law in Principle LBC Thomson Reuters, Sydney, 8th edition 2009…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Etma01

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Houston [1996] S.C.L.R. 943 Reading 3, W150 An Introductory to law in contemporary Scotland, Milton Keynes, The open University.…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The required text is Law 101: Introduction to Law (12th ed, 2014). Students are expected to attend the…

    • 1314 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Trust – The right, enforceable solely in equity, to the beneficial enjoyment of property to which another person holds the legal title; a property interest held by one person (the trustee) at the request of another (the settlor) for the benefit of a third party (the beneficiary). Settlor – Someone who makes a settlement of property; esp., one who sets up a trust. — Also termed creator; donor; trustor; grantor; founder. Beneficiary – Someone who is designated to receive the advantages from an action or change; esp., one designated to benefit from an appointment, disposition, or assignment (as in a will, insurance policy, etc.), or to receive something as a result of a legal arrangement or instrument. The aforementioned terms are commonly understood by attorneys, legal scholars, and laypersons alike. These terms serve as the fundamental base for any trust agreement, providing the instrument, and two of the three key actors within the trust (trustee being the third). On their faces,…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: The English Legal System – 9th Edition (2008/2009) by Catherine Elliot and Frances Quinn…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Definition – the law of Trust determines the relationship among trustee, trustor and beneficiaries over the property. Trustor means owner of the property, which enjoys extended bundle of rights over his property. Trustee is a person who manages the property. Beneficiary: A beneficiary is anyone who receives benefits from any assets the trust owns.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Company Law

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Tony, C. & Christopher, S. 2009, Corporations Law in Principle, 8th edn, Thompson Reuters, Australia…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lloyds Bank Plc V Rosset

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mr. and Mrs. Rosset purchased a dilapidated farmhouse found by Mrs. Rosset. She knew that the purchase money came from a family trust fund, inherited by Mr. Rosset and it was required for the property to be in his name alone. Mrs. Rosset spent most of the time managing the work of constructors and aided in construction even in the absence of Mr. Rosset. The trust fund couldn’t maintain the renovations and the price of the house so Mr. Rossett took an overdraft from Lloyds Bank, unknown to Mrs. Rosset. He defaulted payments and Lloyds bank decided to take possession of the property. Mrs. Rosset then claimed beneficiary interest in the property.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "Oxford Law :: Socio-legal Studies." Faculty of Law : Home. N.p., n.d. Web. 7 Nov. 2012. <http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/theme/socio>.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Purpose trusts have been established and largely defined in case law, namely Re Astor's Settlement Trust [1952] . An inter vivos trust was created by Lord Astor which had among its objects 'The maintenance of good understanding, sympathy and co-operation between nations, the preservation of the independence and integrity of newspapers, and the protection of newspapers from being absorbed by combines.' It can be seen that the trust has no human objects and is specifically for purposes and not individuals; 'A Trust to be valid must be for the benefit of individuals, which this is certainly not, or must be in the class of gifts for the benefit of the public which the courts in this country recognize as charitable in the legal as opposed to the popular sense of the term' . It was on these grounds that the trust failed.…

    • 1445 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Problem Question i. Knight v Knight set out three requirements for a valid trust. To satisfy the first requirement, certainty of intention, James must have made it clear that he intended for it to be made a trust, rather than a gift, as shown in Jones v Lock. The words used in this instance, that Kath is mentioned as a trustee and that has absolute discretion when distributing the money, can be said to afford a clear intention to create a trust. To satisfy the second requirement, certainty of subject, it is broken into two limbs: it has to be clearly identified as being trust property and it must be clear as to how much property is to be passed on to a beneficiary.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Handbook

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Donovan, ‘The Protector: New Wine in Old Bottles?’ 63, in Trends in Contemporary Trust Law (Oakley, ed) (Clarendon Press, 1996).…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fusion Fallacy

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Two jurisdictions of law exist in Australia: equity and common law. ‘Equity is ‘the body of law developed by the Court of Chancery in England before 1873. Its justification was that it corrected, supplemented and amended the common law. It softened and modified many of the injustices at common law, and provided remedies where, at law, they were either inadequate or non-existent.’[1] Common law is ‘the unwritten law derived from the traditional law of England as developed by judicial precedence, interpretation, expansion and modification.’[2] The complete fusion of these jurisdictions has not yet occurred. The two “streams” of jurisdiction have merged in some areas as the law has developed, but are technically still separate. This essay will prove this claim using the equitable doctrines of estoppel and fiduciary obligations and will then discuss remedies.…

    • 2529 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Search Powers

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Slapper, Gary, and David Kelly. The English Legal System Thirteenth Edition 2012-2013. Oxon: Routledge, 2012.…

    • 1435 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Duty Of Care

    • 5098 Words
    • 21 Pages

    In this article, Andrew Barker, from the Faculty of Law at the University of Otago, considers…

    • 5098 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics