Spence case, both parties were in a lawsuit about informed consent. The physician failed to tell the patient of the risks that can happen while going into surgery and any risks that can happen after the surgery. The patient was told of the surgery but did not ask for any additional information. For my personal choice in this case i would find both sides responsible for some of the factors that has happened in the decision making of the physician and the patient. I believe that if the patient has a well grounded mind then the physician should tell them about all the risks for the precare, the surgery itself, and the postoperative care. All of this information can help to save the hospital from a lawsuit. Also, when the patient is presented with an illness that can be helped with an operation they should always do some research about it. This includes being able to ask additional questions and concerns to the…
I. Introduction a. Aaron Skeens b. Medical Law and Ethics c. The Case of John F. and the HMO d. John is a 34 year-old male who has found himself visiting his local clinic quite often due to the finding of blood in his stools. At every visit, John never sees a physician, only a physician’s assistant. Robert, the physician’s assistant, never orders any testing on John, only sends him home with the advice to take an antacid.…
Part of the investigation related to the doctor allowing his wife, Christine Bell-Kaplan to practice medicine beyond her scope of practice and problems related to the doctor’s ability to practice surgery safely.…
In the Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial Hospital, Dr. Alexander’s way of treating the patient is a great example of medical malpractice. Although the failure to follow the adequate standard of care might have been unintentional, it resulted in a very significant and permanent damage to the patient. When a patient chooses to go to a hospital to seek medical attention, he or she expects the facility to treat him with excessive care. In this case, the jury found negligence by both Dr. Alexander as well as in the nursing staff in regards to the follow ups as the medical record supported the evidence. I strongly believe that both the physician as well as the hospital (unless the physician was an independent contractor) are both responsible…
What are some cognitive changes seen in a number of elderly patients? (At least 2)…
According to the text negligence is, “a type of tort in which an athletic trainer fails to act as a reasonably prudent athletic trainer would under the circumstances.” In this situation, Christine was negligent through omission, meaning that she failed to do something that an athletic trainer should have done in the situation. Christine should have first asked the athlete if she had ever taken Ibuprophen before and if she had any poor medical reactions to the medication. After asking the athlete, Christine should have referred to the athlete’s records to ensure that the athlete is okay to take Ibuprophen. The omission in this case may be proof of the conduct portion of a negligence claim. Another step in proving negligence is if Christine breached a duty owed to the athlete. The big question is, did Christine exercise the standard of care that other athletic trainers would have performed in this case? If so, then breach of duty won’t contribute to the negligence claim, but if not then it will be. Finally, the easiest determinant of negligence in this case would be damage. Did the breach of duty, if any, cause any harm to the athlete? What we know from the case is that the athlete became violently ill, so therefore the athlete was harmed and I think it is safe to say suffered from damages. These damages would confirm the damage portion of the negligence claim. In this case the physician and Christine would be liable so they could face consequences to any titles that they have towards their names just as certifications or licenses. The school could also face liability issues over this situation. To address these liability concerns there should be some risk management put into place to deal with this case and any future cases. If done well enough these risk management techniques such as avoidance, transference, retention, or reduction should help prevent any future situations. A new policy and procedure…
In addition, the unstable mental state of the accusers was cause to more accusations. Ergot, a parasitic fungus that grows on the established New England crop rye, has ten percent of the active ingredients in LSD, giving it harsh hallucinogenic effects (Doc N). This caused different states of insanity. Epidemic records showed that females were more susceptible to the ergot poisoning than men were. This was cause to the numerous accusations made by females in 1692. Ergot poisoning, or Ergotism for short, is characterized by a number…
Winona Ryder’s statement about Abigail Williams’ character is very controversial. I believe, unlike Ryder, that Abigail was indeed a villain. Much like her friends, Abigail loved being the “talk of the town.” Once Abigail realized she was receiving attention from the town, she found ways to keep it by accusing people of witchcraft. In Act 1, Abigail says, “...I saw Sarah Good with the Devil! I saw Goody Osburn with the Devil! I saw Bridget Bishop with the Devil!” This proves that Abigail made many false accusations against other townspeople to keep the attention on herself. On the other hand, some might believe that Abigail is innocent. People claim that Abigail and her friends are doing it for fun and games at first, but not long after,…
Don't lie to hail she comes to me while I sleep she's always making me dream corruptions."page 1091" The crucible is in the astonishing play about the history of Salem and witchcraft. This play is a story from past time, Abigail Williams is a huge part of this play because of her scheming ways to put people to death as you can see from the previous quote I listed, this was one of her many lies. Many different people play a role in the Salem deaths but Abigail started all and kept playing it off until she killed in abundant amount. Abigail is responsible for numerous deaths that occurred during this time. Due to her falsely accusing goody Proctor, threatening the girls to take part in her lies, and her admission to guilt by leaving Salem. Abigail is most to blame as a result of her extremely persuasive ways that involve threats towards the rest of the girls which made them start blaming people for witchcraft and they lied about all the things that they were accused of.…
I agree with Winona Ryder when she says Abigail Williams is the villian. Why I think this is because a lot of trouble and also a lot of drama was created by her. Abigail Williams first off is a bad person because she threatens people and uses power. Secondly she threatens all these people without second guessing which shows she is evil. Thirdly she accused people of things that they didn't do. Such as accusing Elizabeth proctor of something she didn't do. That shows she wanted bad for others and tried to take the easy way out of things. Finally she was a bad person because she just caused problems all around and was a negative in the…
Society has shaped us many different ways. If you were to look at society 50 years ago you would see that it was believed that a woman belonged at home, in the kitchen, or taking care of the kids. Most people think we have changed but if you watch T.V. or listened to most people (Male or Female) talk you would realize we haven’t changed all that much. In today’s world you still hear things like “he’s the man of the house” or “That’s a man’s job”. You may even hear “It’s the woman’s fault”. This is just one way society has shaped us since the beginning of time. Even Adam blamed Eve when he ate the fruit from the forbidden tree.…
Abigail Williams is a very important if not the most important person to this play. She has many different qualities that make her the unpredictable enigma she is. abby lies, cheats, steals, persuades, and snitches on everyone and anyone who gets in the way of what she wants. She has had a sheltered life and is tired of it which makes her quite rebellious and manipulative. It all starts out with her trying to find love in the wrong places.…
All is fair in love and war" Abigail Williams a girl of 17, from The Crucible sure did put a new spin to this saying. She believed that her love for John Proctor, a married man, was true love and so did a great many atrocities for that so called "love" even though in truth it was just a affair. This girl is the main villain of this story and thus is characterized as such : crazy, obsessed, and truly a manipulative girl.…
Although Abigail Williams liked to think of herself as an important part of the witch trials, her motivations for what she did were not that different than many ordinary teenagers: she sought revenge, put her own well-being ahead of others, and let her feelings for John dictate her actions.…
A conniving liar, an adulterous, and power hungry are just a few of the characteristics of who in my opinion, I feel is the tragic hero in Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible” which is none other than a young girl who goes by the name of Abigail Williams. The author, Arthur Williams, has labeled his story a tragedy, but I believe that it is only a tragedy based on your tragic hero. Consequently, since I’ve chosen Abigail Williams as my tragic hero is does not make the story a tragedy. A tragedy is a play, novel or other narrative depicting serious and important events in which the main character comes to an unhappy end. I believe that it is not a tragedy because Abigail Williams, the tragic hero that I’ve chosen, does not have an unhappy ending,…