Preview

Escobedo Vs Illinois Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
984 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Escobedo Vs Illinois Case
From 1960 until 1964 the Escobedo v. Illinois trial was taking place. This trial was over whether or not Escobedo’s rights were violated when he was arrested. Throughout Escobedo’s arrest and interrogation his constitutional rights were indeed violated, as he was not allowed to see his lawyer during his interrogation. Yet without a specific law in place it took various levels of the United States court system to come up with a final verdict for this case. As a result, Escobedo’s Rule was established giving suspects the right to an attorney during an investigation.
On January 30, 1960, Chicago police apprehended Danny Escobedo, without a warrant. He was suspected to be the killer in a murder investigation. Eleven days prior to Escobedo’s
…show more content…
Nevertheless the police had their excuses for going against these …show more content…
They asserted that Escobedo was never formally arrested; therefore, he was never considered an accused personal and did not legally have the right to an attorney. And since “the investigation took place en route to the police station,” (4) the police claimed that the questioning could have never surpassed the level of a general inquiry. The contrast between Escobedo’s and the police’s stories was so drastic that it created much controversy changing the verdict four times.
The first time this case was tried in an Illinois court Escobedo was declared guilty. During the interrogation, the police took Escobedo to face the man who told the police about Escobedo being involved with the murder, DiGerlando. Escobedo cried to DiGerlando, "I didn't kill Manuel, you did it." This proclamation was the only thing that Escobedo had said that put him at the scene of the crime. (5) After the first mistake of Escobedo blurting out this incriminating statement, he continued to say things that later was used to convict

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case of Escobedo V. Illinois set the precedent for the sixth amendment, which is the right to a counsel. It guaranteed that if a person is arrested then they must be informed of their legal rights, which gives them the right to remain silent. When Danny Escobedo was arrested in connection for the shooting of one of his relatives he received an 18-hour interrogation and was later released for not making any self-incriminating statements. Another suspect was later arrested and told police that Escobedo had committed the murder. He was then once again arrested and this time interrogated through the entire night. His attorney had been repeatedly denied permission to talk to his client. Escobedo as well had repeatedly asked to see his lawyer…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nix V. Williams Summary

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Evidence has demonstrated that at the time of unconstitutional interrogation, a search was already in place for the victim, and the body would have inevitably been found. This means had there not be illegal conduct by the police officers, the fairness of the trial would have remained the…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Escobedo case the defendant was found guilty after admitting to the crime. Escobedo asked for a lawyer on several occasions and officers denied allowing him to speak to his lawyer and prevent his lawyer form speaking to him. Following this case the states required police to advise individuals who have been arrest for a felony that they have the right to counsel and silence. Following the Escobedo case the Supreme Court reversed an Arizona court conviction know as the Miranda v. Arizona case. The Miranda v. Arizona case was a case of a 23-year-old man who was arrested for kidnapping and rape. Officers arrested Miranda and transported him to the police station for questioning on the kidnapping and rape and after two hours of questioning…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What is the difference between lawful trickery and unlawful coercion according to the 1990 Supreme Court decision in Illinois v. Perkins?…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his novel Monster, Walter Dean Myers demonstrates the complexity of the justice system, and how people can be tried unethically. The characters, Bobo Evans, Steve Harmon, James King, and Osvaldo Cruz all differ in magnitude of guilt and involvement, but were tried either too harsh, or let off too easily. What differs in each person’s case is attributed to biases including age, race, and cooperations with the police. The first poorly tried suspect in this felony-murder case was Osvaldo Cruz. Osvaldo is a fourteen year old boy who helped out in the robbery, but claimed it was in fear of the suspects that drove him to do this. Osvaldo gave tips to the police, helping them out with the crime. Due to this fact and his young age, he was not tried…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The police and prison officials were most often mentioned as drowning in deceit and hidden motives. Mario Escobedo, Jr. is one of the best examples of how far the state police would go. Escobedo was a defense attorney for bus driver Gustavo González Meza, one of the bus drivers arrested and charged with crimes related to eight women found killed in a cotton field after being kidnapped and raped. Meza had been arrested along with another bus driver, Javier “Víctor” García Uribe, and police stated that both had confessed to the crimes. Escobedo had taken Meza on as a client after much thought and consideration for his own safety. After receiving anonymous threats over the phone, Escobedo was shot and killed while driving home from work. Mario Escobedo Sr. worked tirelessly to prove the state police were behind his son’s death. Escobedo Sr. said, “I still didn’t know then that my son’s own executioners were the agents and comandante of the judicial police of the state.” (Rodriguez, Montané, and Pulitzer, 2007, p.…

    • 2961 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Escobedo was treated like a guilty man; he was not awarded his rights protected under the 5th and 6th Amendments to the United States Constitution. These amendments require that people arrested are made aware of their right to talk to Illinois lawyers and their right to be tried for the suspected crimes. Escobedo was not awarded these rights when he was questioned for the crime.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was determined in the case of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 510 (1968) that upon the trail and conviction of said name petitioner for murder was sentenced to the death penalty. However their was challenge for cause based on an Illinois statute, that allows for any individual juror member that when question at the point of being accepted as potential jurors. If it is determined that he or she would rule in favor of the death penalty, or even rule against the death penalty. The prosecution would be permitted to exclude the prospective jurors for cause with out investigating the determining factor of an impartial ruling. So the supreme court denies the defendant after he…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ex rel. MICHAEL O'CONNELL v. ROBERT TURNER, Superintendent of the Reform School of the City of Chicago.…

    • 2639 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Miranda V. Arizona 1966

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In 1966 Miranda v. Arizona was a landmark of a decision to the United States Supreme Court, in which this was passed because it had four out of five agreeing. The Court held both exculpatory and inculpatory statements in which was made in response to interrogation by the person who is in the custody of the police who will be used in a trial only if the prosecution is able to show that the accused was informed of their right to consult with a lawyer before and even during any questioning and have the right against…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1963, Ernesto Miranda was arrested for kidnapping and rape. Arizona police took him to the police station and interrogated him for two hours. After the interrogation, Mr. Miranda had confessed to the crimes, and provided officers with a written confession. Language at the top of the written confession stated that the confession was given freely and voluntarily without any threats or promises. In addition, the language stated that Mr. Miranda was fully aware of his legal rights. However, Mr. Miranda was not advised that he could remain silent and have an attorney present at the interrogation. Subsequently, the statement was entered into evidence at trial, and Mr. Miranda was convicted and sentenced to prison.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arizona vs Miranda

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Early in 1963, a 17 years old woman was kidnapped and raped in Phoenix, Arizona. The police investigated the case, and soon found and arrested a poor, and mentally disturbed man. The name of this man was Ernesto Miranda. Miranda was 23 years old when he was arrested. On March 13, 1963, Miranda was arrested based on circumstantial evidence linking him to the kidnapping and the rape. After 2 police officers interrogated him for 2 hours, he signed a confession to the rape charge. The form he signed included the following statement:…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Scott Peterson Case

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Individuals break crimes all the time but some cases take America by storm with the mass amount of media coverage. The Scott Peterson trail is a prime example of a criminal case that took the nation by storm. What makes the Scott Peterson trail special is the fact that for the first time in California an individual was sentenced to death based solely on circumstantial evidence. In this paper I will be discussing the Scott Peterson case in three key areas background/summary, evidence, and finally crime elements.…

    • 1776 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    An 18-year-old Phoenix woman had told police officers that she had been kidnapped, driven to the desert and raped. On March 13, 1963, Phoenix Police went to Miranda’s home and arrested him on charges of kidnap and rape. He was then taken to the police station and identified by the victim in a lineup. After being identified he was taken into an interrogation room where police proceeded cross examining him about his whereabouts. Miranda was not told of his rights to counsel prior to questioning.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: * Watts, Vernetta. "Californian Guilty in 10 Murder Cases. (1973, August 20). New York Times, P. 10." Mullin, Herbert. N.P., n.d. Web. 09 May 2013.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays