Preview

Supreme Court Case: Illinois V. Perkins

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
293 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Supreme Court Case: Illinois V. Perkins
What is the difference between lawful trickery and unlawful coercion according to the 1990 Supreme Court decision in Illinois v. Perkins?
The case in brief involved a murder investigation (Stephenson murder) in November 1984, located in East St. Louis, Illinois. The investigation went unsolved until 1986, when an inmate at the Graham Correctional Facility, told officials he had learn information related to the homicide from a fellow inmate, Lloyd Perkins. The inmate detailed certain information related to the investigation that he had received directly from Perkins and the authorities deemed the information credible. Law enforcement traced Perkins location to a jail in Montgomery County, Illinois where he was being held on unrelated charges

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    MILLERSBURG — A Wooster man has denied criminal charges he was in possession of methamphetamine when he was pulled over for a traffic stop in January.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Wisconsin v. Avery is a major case between Steven A. Avery and the state of Wisconsin. Steven Avery was born on July 9, 1962 and grew up in a very small area knows as Manitowoc county in the state of Wisconsin. His family owns an auto salvage yard where abandoned vehicles are obtained for the sale of parts. Avery was not a smart man, his IQ was seventy and he “barely functioned in school”. He had a very rough childhood and he turned to crime through his teens and into his twenties. In 1981, Avery and and his friend were charged with burglary at a local bar and were each sentenced to two years in…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: Police officers were in pursuit of a suspected drug dealer, and were led to an apartment complex. The officers ended up outside of a certain apartment, were the smell of marijuana emanated. The police knocked loudly, and from inside the apartment they heard movement, and the police believed that the sounds were an indication that evidence was being destroyed. The police announced their intent to enter the apartment, kicked the door down to find drugs and drug paraphernalia in plain sight, and arrested King and others. They continued to search the apartment and came across other evidence. King argued that due to the officers not having a warrant…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Smith v. United States, the plaintiff, John Angus Smith, was convicted of engaging in drug-trafficking, which would have granted him a five year sentence had he not “used” a firearm in regards to the incident. As stated in statute 924(c)(1), the use of firearm in relations to a drug-trafficking crime enhanced the sentence, and turned it into a 30-year sentence. The argument at hand is whether the term “use” was to be taken from a broad dictionary definition or in the ordinary meaning. The majority of the court argued that the term “use” should not be limited to the intended use of the firearm (as a weapon) as they exemplified cases of which the firearm was used as a bludgeon even though that was not it’s intended purpose, yet…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mapp vs. ohio: The surrounding of the case was the police came in her house try to find a bomb suspect they found the bomb suspect but they also found pornograph pics of her self so she was arrested that day. The supreme court's decision was that when a police officer is searching you or your house they have to specify what they are looking for. The courts decision maid a big change because the cops if they come in your house looking for a gun but they find a knife they cant arrest you for it because they have to specify what they are looking for.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A recent criminal Supreme Court case that I find to be interesting is Missouri v. Frye. Actus reus is a guilty act, mens rea is a guilty mind, and concurrence is the equality of rights. Both actus reus and mens rea are both needed in order for a defendant to prove criminal liability. This case was about a guy named Frye, he was arrested for driving with a revoked license. Frye was previously arrested a few times before this incident dealing with the same crime. Missouri state law can give you a maximum sentence of up to four years when arrested three times for driving on a revoked license. The prosecutor sent Frye's counsel a letter that offered two possible plea bargains. If he was to plea guilty the charge could be reduced to a misdemeanor…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The two primary suspects of the Clutter case, Richard Eugene Hitchcock and Perry Edward Smith, were arrested on December 30, 1959 for driving a stolen vehicle in Las Vegas, Nevada. Alvin Dewey, the detective assigned to the Clutter case, was informed by a colleague that the suspects were arrested. Fearing that he would lose his only opportunity to interrogate Hitchcock and Smith, Dewey drove to the Las Vegas police station. When first questioned about their involvement in the quadruple homicide, both suspects recounted a phony story they had conceived and notably rehearsed. Perry is the first of the suspects, to succumb to the detective's scrupulous questioning, he then began to recount what really occurred on the evening of November 14,1959.…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presser V. Illinois was a landmark Supreme Court case in 1816. Herman Presser was part of a Citizen’s militia group, called the Lehr und Wehr Verein. They were a group of armed ethnic German Workers, they had formed in order to counter the armed private armies in Chicago. Herman Presser was indicted for arming a private army without having a license from the Governor. However, his charges were later sent to the U.S Supreme Court. Therefore after reviewing the case, and hearing Herman Presser’s testimony. The Supreme Court ruled in a 9/0 majority. The Supreme Court Stated “Unless restrained by their own constitutions, state legislatures may enact statutes to control and regulate all organizations, drilling, and parading of military bodies and…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Branzburg v. Hayes was the only ever supreme court case to deal with reporter’s privilege. The ruling of this case was that reporter’s had no right to hide their sources in a court case. The chief justice at the time,Warren Burger, made a point that reporters, “like other citizens, [must] respond to relevant questions put to them in the course of a valid grand jury investigation or criminal trial (Fargo,2010).” With a decision that was five for and four against, this case was not an open and shut many thought it to be. Calling into play a look at the first amendment and what it really means when it says the freedom of speech. Interpreting a document that is more than two hundred years old is not an easy task to accomplish, having to combine…

    • 165 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case: Near v. Minnesota 1931 U.S. Supreme Court Parties Jay Near (Plaintiff) State of Minnesota (Defendant) Facts: A publication, The Saturday Press, published an article alleging that City officials of Minneapolis were complaisant with gangsters who were engaged in illegal activities in the city. A Minnesota law was in effect which allowed the state courts to enjoin a publication which was engaged in a public nuisance. To be a nuisance the publisher had to be printing material that was malicious, scandalous, and defamatory.…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In today’s society, the death penalty is still a very controversial topic on its own however, add the possibility of a Fifth Amendment violation makes it worse. For the people in the State of Kansas, it something for significant since the reinstatement of the death penalty in 1994. The case of Kansas V. Cheever involves just that, the sentence of death for a man accused of killing a Kansas Sherriff. During the trial the defendant declared a voluntary intoxication defense due to the consumption of methamphetamines at the time of the killing. A mental health exam was ordered to see if Cheever’s mental capacity made him incapable of premeditation…

    • 3392 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Firstly, Linda Brown was born in 1943, became a part of civil rights history as a third grader in the public schools of Topeka, KS. When Linda, an African American girl was denied admission into a white elementary school, Linda's father, Oliver Brown, challenged Kansas's school segregation laws in the Supreme Court. Linda Brown's case in the Supreme Court was Brown Vs. Board of Education of Topeka.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Simmons Death Penalty

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the 1993 Missouri court case Ropers v. Simmons, Christopher Simmons (17 y/o), accompanied by his two friends Charles Benjamin and John Tessmer, devised a plan to kill Shirley Cook. The full plan was to commit burglary and homicide by breaking and entering the residence, tying up the woman, and tossing the victim off a bridge (We the People). The night of the murder the three met at midnight, Tessmer later decided to drop out of the plan. Without Tessmer, Simmons and Benjamin broke into Mrs. Crook's home, bound her hands, covered her eyes, and then drove her to a state park and threw her off a bridge. Although Simmons later pleaded innocence because of the evidence, leading up to the crime, Simmons had expressed to his two friends that he wanted to murder someone (Roper v. Simmons). He deliberately planned this murder for months and presented his plan to his two friends who later played a significant role in the ruling.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One relevant United States Supreme Court case is Roe v. Wade. In 1854 Texas law prohibited abortion except “for the purpose of saving the life of the mother.” “Jane Roe” (Norma McCorvey) was denied an elective abortion under that law, and therefore, filed a lawsuit claiming that this Texas law denied her part of her constitutional rights. The Supreme Court ruled in her favor, declaring that the Texas law violated her constitutional right to have an abortion. The Court, however, acknowledged that the Constitution does not explicitly mention a right to abortion but said such a right was part of the “right to privacy.” The decision of the Court was that abortion must be permitted for any reason a woman chooses until the child becomes viable.…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Missouri V. Smith Analysis

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Questioning a person’s sanity after the commitment of an inhumanely gruesome crime is completely natural, but it is something that we must do. It is hard to believe that someone sound of mind could murder, dismember, and hide the corpse of a loved man- but this is exactly what has happened in the case of Missouri v. Smith. In summary, here is the case: Mr. Johnson has been murdered by Mr. Smith. The murder was premeditated, meaning Smith planned it. The motivation, Smith says, is that Johnson had an "evil eye" which caused the Smith stress and agony. Therefore, Smith decided that he must murder the old man in order to rid himself of the evil eye. Every night for seven nights, at around midnight, Smith opened Johnson's door and looked inside, specifically at the his eye. Finally, on the eighth…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays