Preview

Essay On Abraham Lincoln's Abuse Of Presidential Power

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
607 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Abraham Lincoln's Abuse Of Presidential Power
Throughout history , presidents have taken different steps in abusing the executive orders and other presidential directives. Many citizens expressed different views over the executive abuse and benefits the presidents have. The increased use of executive legislation in the absence of challenges from Congress has expanded the power, boundaries, and pose a serious threat to the democracy.
During the late 1800s, Abraham Lincoln’s abuse of power during the American Civil War. Despite his abilities to keep America sane and together, some of his most controversial decisions might actually be considered now to be abuses of the Presidential power. During his terms as president, he suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus, and upheld the Declaration of Independence above the Constitution. The writ of Habeas Corpus protects
…show more content…
Before suspending the writ, he had officers and soldiers to take things into their hands. One author who dedicated his life to this issue, Joshua Kleinfeld, wrote “ when Lincoln suspended the Writ of Habeas Corpus, he clothed himself with more power than any individual had possessed in America before, or since.”( Joshua Kleinfeld). Lincoln was a determined president even though his power has gotten the best of him. With the unlimited powers, Abraham Lincoln took away a great deal of power from the legislative branch because and his proclamation. Even though the right belonged to the Congress, he was not empowered under the Constitution to make such a declaration. Another statement by Roger Taney that the he had the power, the stance, and the position to do what he pleased which was getting out of hand. Taney states "a state of rebellion is the only time when Congress could declare the writ removed." He also believed: "This article is devoted to the legislative department of the United States, and has not the slightest reference to the executive branch.."(Roger Taney). He emphasizes that the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    On May 25th, 1861, John Merryman is taken from his home and is imprisoned in Fort McHenry. This was a result of Pratt Street Riot in Baltimore, and Merryman was arrested by the order of Gen. Keim. Merryman was then put under the custody of Gen. Cadwalader at the Fort, a copy of the warrant (which the prisoner was arrested) was demanded by his counsel, and refused. Chief Justice Roger Taney demanded Merryman be produced for a trial, and Cadwalader couldn’t obey the writ. Without violating his honor and under the authority of the president he refused. Cadwalader had every right to do so, Merryman was seen as a traitor during a time of rebellion. But the question is, did President Lincoln have the power to suspend the privilege of the Writ of…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As the only President to preside over an American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln entered the office of the presidency with mounting challenges ahead of him. The country’s overwhelming divide regarding the issue of slavery proved to be the central issue in the 1861 elections. President Lincoln’s strong resolve to reunite the union catalyzed a sharp shift in his beliefs regarding the weight of power in the executive branch, helping Lincoln strengthen the office of the Presidency like never before. This set a precedent for future Presidents, notably Theodore Roosevelt, whose legislation on big business and “speak softly and carry a big stick” methodology to foreign relations, while thoroughly of his own design, most certainly finds its roots in the empowered President Lincoln.…

    • 1999 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Schanberger, W. (2015). An “Unconstitutional” Act? The Suspension of the Writ of Habeas Corpus. Retrieved on February 2, 2015 from http://www.gilderlehrman.org/history-by-era/american-civil-war/resources/%E2%80%9Cunconstitutional%E2%80%9D-act-suspension-writ-habeas-corpus…

    • 1990 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the suspension of Habeas Corpus, Lincoln could "arrest, and detain, without resort to the ordinary processes and forms of law, such individuals as he might deem dangerous to the public safety." Lincoln used the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus to arrest Maryland officials who were for the secession of…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Did you know that John Wilkes Booth’s original plan was to kidnap Abraham Lincoln? Abraham Lincoln was assassinated by John Wilkes Booth on April 14, 1865. Booth snuck into the presidential booth and shot Lincoln in the head with a pistol. Escaping Booth broke his leg, but worked through the pain. Booth was captured 12 days later. The morning of April 15, Abraham Lincoln died. The assassination of Lincoln shocked the country. He was the first president to be assassinated. Even though John Wilkes Booth was desperate, the assassination of him was unjustified because John Wilkes Booth didn't have to kill him for his stand on politics and no power over the decision for Lincoln to win the election.…

    • 465 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abraham Lincoln is known as "The Great Emancipator" who freed the slaves. Yet in the early part of his career and even in the early stages of his presidency, Lincoln had no objection to slavery where it already existed, namely, in the Southern states. As a savvy politician, he always wanted to maintain the union, and he would use any device to keep the country together. However, his views on slavery evolved during his presidency, and the personal opposition towards slavery that he claimed he always had began to show through in his policy. As Lincoln noted in 1864, "I am naturally anti-slavery. If slavery is not wrong, nothing is wrong. I can not remember when I did not so think, and feel" (Lorence 306). Despite such strongly worded beliefs, Lincoln policies towards slavery often shifted for the sake of political expedience. For example, he pledged that states would be compensated for their loss of property as a result of emancipation to keep the border states from seceding. Still, by 1862 Lincoln had become firm in his convictions that slavery must be abolished. He even pressed for a constitutional amendment to ensure freedom to all the slaves. Lincoln espoused strong anti-slavery views, but he often put what he viewed as the good of the country ahead of the cause. Despite many detours along the way, he proved himself to be "The Great Emancipator." As a self-made politician from humble origins, Lincoln struggled in his early political life to define his identity. He described his childhood as "The short and simple annals of the poor. That's my life, and that's all you or any one else can make of it" (Oates 4). Lincoln felt extremely embarrassed about his background and worked his entire life to overcome the limitations he faced. He made himself a "literate and professional man who commanded the respect of his colleagues" (Oates 4). It is difficult to assess Lincoln's early views on slavery and race because they were constantly changing in an effort to achieve such…

    • 2258 Words
    • 65 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In times where Americans needed liberty the most, that is where they found it the least. As Justice David Davis once said, “By the protection of the law human rights are secured; withdraw that protection, and they are at the mercy of wicked rulers, or the clamor of an excited people,” (Source D). During the Civil War, there lied the question of wrong or right in the actions of our authority figures we entrusted our life, liberty, and happiness into the most. This remained so, with President Abraham Lincoln’s suspension of the Habeas Corpus, a writ that maintained the liberties of the accused, but was ultimately suspended by the uncontrollable peril the United State’s authorities felt they were receiving from the surrounding states.The suspension…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety," says Benjamin Franklin in Historical Review of 1759. Others tend to say just the opposite of what Ben Franklin quoted. With that being said, a key question comes up for discussion: Does the government have the Constitutional power to suspend the Constitution during a time of crisis? Certain documents were brought up for discussion that deal with certain articles from the Constitution and some acts/laws that the Congress passed to substantiate whether the government has certain powers. By using the U.S. Constitution, the Espionage Act, the Sedition Act, an executive order from President Franklin D. Roosevelt, and two federal Supreme…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The U.S. Constitution affords certain authorities to the Executive Branch of the Federal Government. Although many are specifically spelled out, one that is not, is the use of executive actions, through executive orders and memorandums. These actions have been used for varying reasons by almost every President of the United States. Of late, many of these orders issued by President Obama and President Trump have been viewed as an attempt to bypass the legislative power of Congress. At times, though, these orders are needed to effectively establish a policy, in a timely manner, due to the increased partisanship and grid-lock which Congress faces today.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    87 years ago the founding fathers created a new country based on the idea that everyone is created equally, and the war they were in at the time was testing whether or not a country like that can survive. I think Abraham Lincoln was trying to honor the soldiers for risking their lives for our country, and by doing so he dedicated part of the battlefield a cemetery for those who lost their lives in the war.…

    • 77 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Executive orders enable the President of the United States of America to enact a pseudo-law without the need of approval from Congress. Some presidents make more use of them than others. For example, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, in the early 30's, took the most advantage of them due to the Great Depression. Similar to FDR, President Trump is making the most of his privilege in the White House, but in contrast to FDR's helping initiative, one of President Trump's executive orders were instituted on a discriminatory basis that benefits his many business ties.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Habeas Corpus

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages

    References: Levin-Waldman, O. M. (2012). American government. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Chapter 8 – Civil Liberties and Civil Rights /Chapter 5, Section 5.7 – Wartime President…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    All through time it has been said that Abraham Lincoln is one our country’s most recognizable leaders. Abraham Lincoln is one of the most known and beloved presidents in history. He was the 16th President of the United States and is well known for achieving feats such as keeping the Union together and accomplishing the emancipation of slavery. Lincoln had countless supporters as well as defiance and protection all along the American Civil War. Lincoln showed fortitude and never gave up on his vision and goals. Thus, subsequently battling for years, Lincoln was able to deliver freedom and support to those who were chained by weights of racism and prejudice. Abraham Lincoln had characteristics of leadership such as the ability to communicate…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The theory finds validation in an expansive interpretation of Article II of the Constitution where it states that “the executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America”, thus granting the president a range of powers that are not specified in Article II to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed.” This differs from the other two vesting clauses in the Constitution in the sense that it is vesting power into a single individual, rather than a body such as Congress or the judiciary. Application of this theory is evident in the expanding power of the executive, and the extension of existing executive powers such as national security powers, executive orders, and even presidential signing statements. In the area of national security, the theory of the unitary executive would justify the president’s power to make unilateral decisions concerning the state of war the country is in, without the consent of Congress. The increasing use of executive orders is also evidence of the application of ideas rooted in the unitary executive theory because it reflects the president’s ability to unilaterally accomplish goals of the administration. Presidential signing statements are also evidence of the appropriation of the…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A common topic when discussing executive orders is the constitutionality of the President’s power to use them. It is constitutional since it is the President’s duty to faithfully execute the…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays