Preview

Essay On Insanity Defense

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
842 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Insanity Defense
The Insanity Defense and Its Impact On the Criminal Justice System Criminal defense is such an important part of the trial process. The defense is important because it can help the attorney’s client to get little to almost no time in jail or prison. The most important but also difficult part of the process is figuring out what defense to use and what defense not to use. Out of the many defenses that are used, only one stands out: the insanity defense.
Insanity Defense: An Introduction
The insanity defense, also known as the mental disorder defense, is a defense by excuse in a criminal case, arguing that the defendant is not responsible for their actions due to an episodic or persistent psychiatric disease at the time of the criminal act. The
…show more content…
It has called for a new definition of the word “insanity” and has caused many new standards to be put in place. A new standard, for example, is the competency test. All jurisdictions require that criminals must be competent to stand trial, meaning that the accused knows the nature of their actions and understand that what they did was wrong, if they cannot do that they will be found to be mentally incompetent to stand the trial (FindLaw). This, however, does not mean that the person is immediately found not guilty or innocent. The person will receive treatment until they are competent enough to stand trial. The insanity defense also called for a reform act in 1984, stating that the defendant must be unable to understand the “nature and quality of the wrongfulness of his acts” (FindLaw). It also states that a mental disease does not constitute as an argument. Lastly, the insanity defense has called for a test that decides if the criminal is mentally ill, however, guilty. The guilty but mentally ill verdict allows criminals who are mentally ill to be found liable for their actions and receive treatment while in jail or be sent to a mental hospital. Once they are seen to be well enough, they will be sent to prison to serve their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    This means that the guilty individual receives the fairest possible sentence. A comparison to another insanity defense used, was the case of the Esposita brothers who had clearly faked being insane to get out of a death sentence. The Esposita brothers set a plan to gain money through robbery and were well equipped to take lives if anyone stood in the way. Both brothers were charged for murder of police officers and citizens. During their court trial, the Esposita brothers pretended to show signs of insanity by speaking in gibberish and banging their heads against the table. The jury was not convinced due to lack of evidence showing past history of insanity and had sentenced them to death by electrocution in 1942. This is one of many cases where a criminal had attempted to get out of a deserving consequence by using the insanity defense. Although it is rarely the case, some criminals convince the judge that they truly are insane when in fact, they were simply successful in fooling the judge. In comparison to the case of Dennis Pozniak who clearly was insane, it was determined that there was no benefit to the actions performed by Dennis and it was simply a spontaneous event that was brought due to an insane state of mind. Is it fair for an individual to get out of their deserved consequence simply because they convinced the judge that they are insane? I believe that unless the…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense is not covered as its own constitutional right, although it faults under the due process clause in the 5th and 14th amendments. The states define their own elements for what constitutes insanity, using the common law as a guideline. Mens rea—Latin for the “guilty mind” — is one of the necessary elements for insanity. If found incompetent, the person is usually charged to…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guilty by reason of insanity: The criminal is not guilty because they do not know right from wrong.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They have to understand the charges brought against them, the consequences that could potentially be suffered if there is a conviction, must also have some understanding of the procedures in the courtroom and those who are apart of it. The defendant should also have an “underlying bases for any diagnoses” meaning a mental impairment (Gaskell). Stated in the “Insanity Defense Pros and Cons List” article one of the cons mentioned is that if there is not a previous record of any type of mental disease then the jury may have a hard time believing the insanity plea. If the defendant is found not guilty they are sent to mental health institutions and will stay there until they are thought to be safe to leave the facility. If there is a claim of insanity but they are still found guilty they will go to prison and most will still receive mental health help is will just not be as good of quality, if they get any (Reisner, Piel, & Makey,…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psy/270 Mind over Matter

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mental illness is a health condition that affects a person’s thoughts, behavior, and emotions (in some cases all three) which in turns affects the person’s ability to function in their daily lives. Insanity (used as a legal term) is an individual who is diagnosed with a mental illness, unable to know right from wrong, and is unable to function accordingly.…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The insanity defense should be allowed for those with a mental illness when they commit a crime since they are not in control of their actions. “If a person really does have mental incapacity, and it will be considered that his condition has caused him to commit a capital crime, which means the defense could save his life. Put in mind that a capital crime carries a punishment of eventual death. However, being found not guilty because of insanity means that a capital punishment is out of the question. It could mean that the accused would just be housed at a professional mental health treatment center. Though it might not be jail, still it gets him off the streets,” (12 Profound Pros and Cons of the Insanity Defense [Web log post]. (n.d.). Retrieved May 16,…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The author of this paper argues several reasons why the insanity plea should be changed or either eliminated. The reasons are considered and supported by evidence. The conclusion states that insanity should be altered or eliminated for the safety and well being of society.…

    • 1668 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal Defense Analysis

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the greatest right’s we have in America is the right to be innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. It is ultimately the job of the prosecutor to prove to the people, the jury and to the court that the accused is in fact guilty of a crime. The accused either has his own or appointed attorney to present his various defenses to argue why he acted the way he did during the crime. According to Criminal Law Today, “A defense consists of evidence and arguments offered by a defendant and his or her attorneys to show why that person should not be held liable for a criminal charge” (Schmalleger 2010, pg. 114). This paper will discuss various forms of criminal defenses and how they are used in court.…

    • 881 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first article I read was “A Suitable Punishment the Future of the Insanity Defense”. In the article the author talks about the insanity defense and how the public dislikes it. The general public believes that it is a cop out and allows people to get away with murder. Mr. Woychuk, being a lawyer, also talks about the battle of expert witnesses, the Mnaghten rule, and other issues related to the insanity plea. He also deals with the ineffectiveness of the American prison system in terms of deterrence and rehabilitation. The ability of the mental hospitals to retain a person until they are fit to leave is also discussed. He suggests this would be a better way of doing things in prisons to stop them from being revolving doors. This is where he then goes off on child rapists. He thinks they should be given an indeterminate sentence so they will not go out and commit the same crime again. Not allowing the criminals to commit these horrible acts would stop the cycle of kids being abused and then becoming dysfunctional as adults. Overall Mr. Woychuk believes that if the issue of personal responsibility is not dealt with properly we will continue to have violence and excuses for it.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Excuse Defense Process

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An excuse defense is to plead insanity. In order for some one to be excused by the defense of insanity, there defense attorney must prove that the defendant did not have the necessary mental capacity to be held responsible for his or her actions at the time of the crime. There are different test that could be taken to help an insanity plea. The different tests include: the M’Naughten rule, which is a right vs. wrong test; the irresistible impulse test; the Durham rule, which could also be called the products test, where the criminal act was the product of a mental defect or disease; and the substantial capacity test (Criminal Justice in Action, 2006). An example of a justification defense is to Self Defense. In order for Self Defense to be justified the defense attorney must prove that the defendant acted in a manner to defend himself or herself or they acted in the manner to defend other people, or even property. The self defense plea could also be justified if the defendant acted in the manner to prevent the commission of a crime. These are just a few examples of how self defense could be…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Many people wrongly believe that there are only two ways to plead in trial, guilty and not guilty. There is also another way to plead, that most people use to try and escape any criminal responsibility, pleading not guilty by reason of insanity. Not guilty by reason of insanity refers to the defense of offenders not to deny the commission of the crime, but to assert they lacked the capacity to understand the nature of the crime or that it was wrong (Allen). The definition of pleading legally insane can differ from each state, country or jurisdiction. This is usually abused and pleaded wrongly. Therefore it is very difficult to be found not guilty this way. A study carried out in the USA found that the insanity defense is only used in about 1% of all court cases and is only successful in about 26% of those cases (New York Times). The jury must discover if the plea were true or not based on extreme psychiatric testimonies and usually lengthy trials. A prime example of this is in the murder of Elena Steinberg, also known as the sleepwalk murder. In this murder Steven Steinberg was found not guilty on reasons of temporary insanity.…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity Defense

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Insanity defense is something everyone has a different perspective on. Some people accept it, while others don’t believe it’s the correct thing to do. In criminal trials, insanity defense is the claim that the defendant is not responsible for his or her actions due to mental health problems. The person who commits the crime realizes, understands, and admits that they have committed a crime however they argue they should not be held accountable for their actions due to mental illnesses. In cases like these they plead “not guilty by reason of insanity.” There are of course several different definitions of insane such as the M’Naghten rule, the Durham rule, the Federal rule, and the Model Penal code. With appropriate test set by the jury, forensic mental health professionals can test and evaluate the defendant to see if they qualify under insanity defense. Their testament can guide the jury; however they cannot decide the defendant’s punishment. The decision is up to the jury, she/he is then left to say whether the defendant is or isn’t insane. This decision is also known as the “ultimate issue” or the “ultimate question.” Whether or not something like this should be acceptable in a trial is questioned by many, I believe that this should not be acceptable. Insanity defense should indeed be abolished.…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Insanity law is any kind of change to the judicial system based on the defendant’s mental state. There have been many various legal tests over the years, all of which have been criticised. Most judicial systems base it off the case of Daniel M’Naghten. “In M’Naghten’s Case (1843) the English judges held that “to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the committing of the act, the party accused as labouring under such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know the nature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that he did not know he was doing what was wrong.” Some U.S. courts went further and also relieved from responsibility one moved by an “irresistible impulse””(Norton). Still these measures aren’t enough. In Mack v. Western Australia a defendant with autism was convicted of murder on the circumstantial evidence. This man was unable to properly understand what was happening and didn’t go with a plea deal to lower his sentence. This shows that judicial systems are ill prepared to deal with autistic defendants or any defendant of any mental health…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The defences of insanity, substantial impairment by abnormality of mind and automatism play a vital role in avoiding criminal liability. Principally, the defences reflect the idea that intellectually challenged individuals should not be penalised but rather treated of their mental impairment. However the outcomes of each defence have also been criticised as ‘anomalous and arbitrary’ due to conflicting legal and medical definitions. Consequently, support for the abolishment of these defences has been proposed to be replaced by sentencing discretion so that consistent and proportionate application of the law is achieved. However ultimately, abolishing the defences is undesirable as it is both ineffective and morally wrong to punish the mentally ill through sentencing. Rather, these defences need to be defined more clearly to curtail anomalous outcomes. The first half of this essay shall focus on key drawbacks of these defences in regards to judicial and medical interpretation as well as the role that sentencing plays in the class of the intellectually challenged. The second half shall assess reforms seeking to qualify and to abolish the defences altogether.…

    • 2511 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When accused of sexual assault, the defendant may plead guilty by reason of insanity. Whether this be true or not, pleading insanity should not be relied on to excuse their behavior. Spending your punished time in a psychiatric facility instead of a prison sentence is not a valid punishment for the crime. If the guilty is truly ruled to be “insane”, or “mentally unstable”, treatment within the prison facility should be arranged. Insanity is not a justifiable reason to gain a lighter sentence. Under no circumstance should a person found guilty of sexual assault receive special treatment.…

    • 97 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays