Preview

Essay On Jefferson's Great Gamble

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
610 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Jefferson's Great Gamble
Charles A. Cerami. Jefferson’s Great Gamble. Naperville, Illinois: Sourcebooks, Inc, 2003. The United States and France were on the brink of war. At stake was the most coveted spot on the planet: a bustling Mississippi River port known as New Orleans. In the center of the crisis stood Thomas Jefferson and Napoleon Bonaparte, two of the greatest leaders of their time, now face to face in a test of wits and wills that would determine the futures of their countries. Jefferson’s Great Gamble is the dramatic story of the Louisiana Purchase – thirty months of high drama, blandishment, posturing and secret maneuvers by some of the most powerful and crafty men of their time. When Jefferson took office as president of the United States …show more content…
Jefferson knew that war might fracture the new country, which at the time had roughly one thousand men in its army. He was therefore face with not only convincing Napoleon that the United States was ready to fight, but also bluffing him into thinking that they could win that battle. To execute his plan, Jefferson turned to his brilliant but troubled foreign-relations team. James Madison, the wily secretary of state, devised with Jefferson a disinformation strategy. Robert Livingston, the American envoy to France, struggled to negotiate with French officials while being disdained and ignored by Jefferson and Madison, his political rivals. As the final negotiations approached, James Monroe found himself sailing to Paris with the key to how the United States would execute the endgame. Contradicting opinions from his two closest advisors bombarded Napoleon. François de Barbé-Marbois – the impeccably honest finance minister – pushed toward a sale to raise money for a war with England. Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord – Napoleon’s witty and corrupt chief advisor – pushed him to hold on to the colony, a position he believed held long-term benefits for France, if not for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Livingston, the U.S. minister at Paris, to take two steps: (1) to approach Napoleon’s minister, Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand, with the object of preventing the retrocession in the event this act had not yet been completed; and (2) to try to purchase at least New Orleans if the property had actually been transferred from Spain to France. Direct negotiations with Talleyrand, however, appeared to be all but impossible. For months Livingston had to be content with tantalizing glimmerings of a possible deal between France and the United States. But even these faded as news of the Spanish governor’s revocation of the right of deposit reached the U.S. minister. With this intelligence he had good reasons for thinking the worst: that Napoleon Bonaparte may have been responsible for this unfortunate act and that his next move might be to close the Mississippi River entirely to the Americans. Livingston had but one trump to play, and he played it with a flourish. He made it known that a rapprochement with Great Britain might, after all, best serve the interests of his country, and at that particular moment an Anglo-American rapprochement was about the least of Napoleon’s…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Robert R. Livingston, and James Monroe (American ambassador) wanted to buy New Orleans, the French foreign minister (Charles Talleyrand) offered the whole Louisiana territory. The American ambassadors were so excited they considered the offer. Napoleon wanted to make America bigger, so they can have a bigger ally in the war. Jefferson…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dinner begins with Thomas Jefferson’s account of the Compromise of 1790. Jefferson explains that Hamilton comes to him discouraged that his fiscal policy was being blocked, with most of that opposing force coming from Madison. In order to help them resolve this issue, Jefferson invited them to a dinner, where a compromise was reached; Madison would leave the assumption bill to its fate, and Hamilton would ensure that the Nation’s capital would lie along the Potomac. The assumption bill passed, and construction for the nation’s capital began along the Potomac. However, Jefferson’s story precipitates several question: was the affair really that simple, and why were these three men so fearful of the nation’s future? Ellis takes us through…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Robert Livingston and James Monroe returned from Paris with the 1803 Louisiana Territory Purchase Treaty, President Thomas Jefferson was faced with a dilemma. Jefferson had sent Monroe to Paris to negotiate the purchase of New Orleans for $2 million. A treaty selling the United States all of the territory was another matter and posed Constitutional issues for the leader of a party that believed in strict construction (interpretation) of the Constitution. Jefferson and the Congress had already authorized the Lewis and Clark Expedition, but not with the intent of owning the vast lands.…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Embargo Dbq

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When Jefferson assumed his presidency he faced several foreign policy issues. One was the issue of British impressing our ships; they would take sailors from American ships and force them to serve in the British navy. One particular incident referred to as “The Leopard Affair” pushed Jefferson to enact the Embargo Act of 1807. Jefferson created this act in order to avoid war with Britain and to appease the public. He knew we would be no match against the British navy, so he figured we could protect ourselves from the English by way of this act. Although he had good intentions, Jefferson did not take into account the effect the Embargo Act would have on our country’s economy. Since the embargo act prevented us from trading with Britain and France, we suffered economically.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush-Revolution of 1800

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In foreign policy, Jefferson got America involved in the Barbary Wars and the Embargo Act. Previous presidents had done what they could to stay neutral in foreign battles and conflicts, but Thomas Jefferson took initiative and this is also present in the XYZ affairs with France. Jefferson brought the country into its real first international involvement.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This policy was made to ensure the stability of France and Great Britain's relations with one another. The policy explained that France will not provide the colonists aid, raise tensions between Portugal and Spain, and will maintain a level of military and naval forces to protect themselves without growing large enough to threaten other countries. Many Frenchmen – including King Louis – feared breaking the informal agreement and resulting in another war with Great Britain. Still, in 1775 France sent secret representative Achard de Bonvouloir to report on the well being of the American colonists and their eagerness for…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were two very smart men back in the day, both trying to figure out how to run our country, The United States of America. Their names of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Both of these two men were brilliant and had strong feelings about their beliefs of how to manage our country. Both Jefferson and Hamilton had me hooked very strongly and Jefferson did get me on his side for a little, but overall Hamilton is the one I believe had better viewpoints as to how to run our government. Some of Hamilton’s main points were believing in the central government, a balanced economy, and he wanted to raise voting qualifications. Overall, I think Hamilton would be more effective and practical when it came to running the United States, so I would choose Hamilton to be a leader in the government.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Art Under Napoleon

    • 3055 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Epstein, D. (2004) The Wall Street Journal Napoleon, David, and the French Paradox Retrieved From: http://proquest.umi.com…

    • 3055 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Starting early in his political career, Richelieu's dealings with international statecraft highlight both the type of issues plaguing France in the early seventeenth century and the resources of determination and shrewdness which he organized to his advantage . His foreign policy of using diplomacy, backed by force only when necessary can be understood specifically through his dealings with the increasingly powerful Spanish-Austrian Habsburg family and furthermore, can be paralleled to Machiavelli's ideas on international diplomacy during times of war.# Prior to Richelieu's ascent to power, France was engaged…

    • 2031 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the year of 1804, two men led an expedition of discovery that expanded a young nation's economic potential, increased its scientific understanding, and as well as enhanced its worldwide reputation. The significant westward expansion was called the Lewis and Clark Expedition. The United States third president, Thomas Jefferson, named Meriwether Lewis the main leader of the expedition and Lewis chose William Clark to accompany him on his glorious journey. Meriwhether Lewis was a veteran of Indian wars skilled in the ways of the wilderness and William Clark was Lewis's commanding officer in the army and also an experienced frontiersman and Indian…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Napoleon III, or Louis Napoleon prior to 1852, is a confusing and divisive figure for historians across the globe. While not enjoying a good press from the largely partisan historians of France, partly due to his violent overthrow of the Second Republic, he was well-liked in Britain and America for half a century or more.1 This essay will attempt to divulge just how much of a liberal, enlightened leader Napoleon III was, if at all so.…

    • 2503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon Iii

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Professional Politicians in France couldn’t believe that Louis Napoleon had won, and they were even more shocked when he did away with them. But this didn’t satisfy the ambitious ruler…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon was a war hero to the French people. His great military tactics helped him to rise to power. Napoleon believed that the army is the true nobility of a country. His skills as a general were both tactical and strategical. By 1810, Napoleon had dominated all of Europe; his victory made him popular amongst his people and brought praise. However, it this praise and popularity that urged Napoleon to stay in power. He thought that when one when does bring victory, then the people would soon get bored and uninterested, thus Napoleon became ruthless and tolerate no argument. This was to prove disastrous in his defeat at Waterloo. Napoleon’s constant ambition to go to war and return with victory was his aim of keeping himself in power.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Schleiffen Plan

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages

    France & Russia. The plan was to get Germany to face a war on two…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays