Preview

Essay On Tempering Evidence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
725 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Tempering Evidence
Collecting evidence is an essential factor to the world of criminology. The evidence can determine whether the person is guilty or not guilty. The matter of handling evidence correctly becomes a priority to anyone who is working in the case.
Throughout the years civil and criminal cases have impacted our world. They have determine whether the suspects of cases and have narrowed down to the offender. But the process that it takes to establish a final conclusion to present to a court is a long and delicate process. A process in which the integrity of the evidence is to be maintained untampered. Unfortunately this has not been simple for criminal investigators. As a society we have witnessed several cases that have had an unjust outcome because of tampered evidence or evidence that was gathered without a warrant.
Some cases that were affected by tampered evidence where the OJ Simpson Murder Trial, The Ex-Massachusetts chemist gets three to five years in tampering case, the mishandling of DNA evidence in Rape Cases, and many more. Each of these cases were different but they all dealt with inadmissible evidence. They all have a different idea of what can happen when criminal investigators collect evidence incorrectly but they are great cases to reflect upon.
…show more content…
As she proceeded onto doing her job someone had discovered that she would altered the results so she would try to change the substance levels. She had conducted substance identification for more than 40,000 cases, according to CNN (Ex-Massachusetts chemists gets 3 to 5 years in tampering case, Retrieved September 17, 2015). Due to the fact that Dookhan had tampered the substances levels for previous cases, the integrity of the cases were put in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic evidence has been used since the beginning of investigating. It could be anything from ammunition, to a handprint on the door, to the drops of blood on the crime scene. As seen in “Forensic Evidence” by Andrea Campbell, the indisputable forensic evidence is the best kind to use in a trial.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trial By Fire Case Study

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The collection and application of evidence have become essential to criminal investigations and prosecutions. Clear and convincing evidence could prove a crime that has been committed, establish key elements of a crime, target a suspect and someone associated with a crime, exonerate the innocent, corroborate a victim’s testimony, and assist in establishing the facts of what occurred (McEwen). Although evidence plays a significant role in prosecutions, there are still many cases involving misuse of evidence, which results in the conviction of an innocent person. In the case of “Trial by Fire,” due to the misuse of evidence by the fire investigators, the State of Texas wrongfully executed Cameron Todd Willingham who was convicted of murdering…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Annie Dookhan Case Study

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages

    She admitted that she had “dry labbed” where she only tested a few samples in a whole batch of samples and had mixed drug samples. Judge Carol S. Ball, gave Dookhan a three to five year sentence in the Suffolk County Superior Court in Boston. The state representative Bradley H. Jones said that the three to five years was not adequate as the prosecutors had asked for five to seven years. The objection was in light to the ongoing complications that Dookhan’s misconduct was causing (Geller,…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When it comes to terms of conducting investigations, law enforcement officers were permitted to manipulate and use unjustified tactics to question the suspects. These measures have a strong tendency to eventually forced defendants into admitting a crime, whether the defendant is guilty or not. Moreover, in some scenarios, the prosecutors would even went as far as convicting defendants based on flimsy evidence and purposely overlook the solid proofs that can demonstrate defendants’ innocence. These dishonest prosecutors abandoned their responsibilities to obtain justice and to serve as the lawful agent for the people; instead, they deliberately violate the moral principles of their duties and the rights of the defendants to secure convictions. The usual forms of prosecutorial misconduct include but not restricted to: “coercing false confessions”, “lying or intentionally misleading jurors about their observations”, “failing to turn over exculpatory evidence to prosecutors”, “pressuring defense witnesses not to testify” and etc.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mass Crime Lab Case

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Former Massachusetts State Crime Lab chemist, Annie Dookhan, has been indicted on twenty-seven counts of tampering with evidence, perjury, and obstruction of justice after a legal fallout that has jeopardized thousands of drug cases (Smith). Dookhan admitted to “dry-labbing” (distinguishing a sample is a narcotic based on appearance instead of actually testing), altering test results, and “deliberately turned a negative sample into a positive for narcotics a few times”. Another way in which she tampered with the testing samples was by exaggerating the weight of seized drugs in order to cause the accused party to receive harsher penalties. As a result of the chemist’s actions, many innocent people have served jail time, while deserving criminals were let off the hook. Even though her coworkers and supervisors were suspicious on several occasions throughout the course of several years, she was not caught until 2011 when she admitted to forging a colleague’s signature on paperwork. It was not until this action, that she was finally suspended from her duties (The Living Case).…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. It is important to use proper methods while collecting evidence from a crime scene because evidence is extremely important in solving a crime, and improper collection could corrupt the entire investigation. Evidence may become contaminated if proper methods are not used, which could severely effect analysis outcomes. Additionally, specific procedures must be followed for evidence to be used in a court room. Therefore, it is extremely important to gather evidence with proper methods in order for that evidence to be useful in a court of law.…

    • 625 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Csi Essay Example

    • 3977 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Technology is rapidly changing every aspect of the criminal justice system as computers make possible the streamlining of many procedures, shortening their time span and increasing their accuracy. Techniques used in the collection, processing and storage of evidence benefit from these recent developments.…

    • 3977 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many years now, there has been an enormous increase in the accusations of innocent defendants of wrongful convictions. Research has shown a number of common factors that appear frequently in wrongful conviction cases, including forensic error, prosecutorial misconduct, false confessions, and eyewitness…

    • 44 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evidence is a type of proof. It is usually used to prove someone innocent or guilty. There are many different types of evidence, such as: testimony, direct, circumstantial, and physical evidence. However, according to the article “Forensic: Evidence, Clues, and Investigation” by Andrea Campbell, forensic evidence is the best evidence to present at a court case or trial.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eyewitness testimony accounted for a majority of the convicted while others contained forensic evidence such as fingerprints, blood evidence, and hair comparison. A small percentage accounted for informant testimony which were found to be inaccurate. When pertaining to the court of appeals results showed that defective evidenced was not reviewed effectively. Consequently the convictions that were reversed only accounted for 14% with almost half consisting of actual inaccuracy. When reviewing the case at the appellate level justifying guilt or innocence is at the highest regard. Unfortunately this can often be difficult when having to make such a ruling while also deciding if an error exists. Defendants that pursued the appellate process were seldom successful challenging innocent claims. Due to the expense and difficulty of challenging the evidence. Convictions that did go to appeal for eyewitness identification were not reversed. Cases pertaining to federal claims did not proceed to appeal, even if they were innocent. Also defendants that gave false confessions only half actually raised a challenged, but none acknowledged a…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does all evidences can be used to convict a person? Circumstantial evidence is an indirect evidence that relies on connection with a particular case, but can’t be used as a proving alone. People have different thought of should circumstantial evidence can be use to convict a person. In my opinion, circumstantial evidence should never use for declaration of guilt because of the following reason. First, it is not credible. Second, It does not contain any or non scientific analysis. Last but not least, Because of circumstantial evidence, many innocent people are punished.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Critical to the understanding of how evidence is presented at trial is understanding how evidence is defined. Knowledge of the rules governing evidence is also essential. This paper introduces several basic but key terms, with particular emphasis on the Federal Rules of Evidence. These definitions should in nowise be construed as complete or authoritative as it is intended to introduce the basic concept as it relates to criminal justice practices.…

    • 3539 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federal Rule of Evidence 403 says, “The court may exclude relevant evidence if its probative value is substantially outweighed by a danger of one or more of the following: unfair prejudice, confusing the issues, misleading the jury, undue delay, wasting time, or needlessly presenting cumulative evidence” (2015). A defense attorney could utilize Motion in limine to request that the judge rule that certain testimony be excluded. The motion is always discussed outside the presence of the jury and is always decided by a judge. For example, after examining police reports and other documents it is detected that the crime scene was contaminated which could be argued that any DNA evidence taken from the scene is compromised and therefore any scientific evidence or expert opinions relating to this would be prejudicial. Another example could be that law enforcement did not procure proper search warrants before a search and seizure; therefore, all evidence gathered resulted in an improper discovery and should be excluded since it violates…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is criminal evidence? Criminal evidence is any exhibit or testimony that will identify guilt, blame, or fault in a criminal case. In many cases, it is questioned upon what actually constitutes “acceptable” evidence (Ellis, 2008). From time to time there have been many cases which have been thrown out, and criminals who have gone free, because the evidence was “corrupt” so to say. To be sure of whether the evidence presented is admissible, one must adhere to but not limited to one of the following: the exclusionary rule, and the fruit of the poisonous tree.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays