Preview

Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1209 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay On Tsarist Autocracy
The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.
Due to Nicholas II’s failure to accomplish the citizen’s goals and to negotiate with them, the Russian Revolution began. Peasants struggled
…show more content…
Many Russians were infuriated by the government because the Tsar did not take action when the country was deteriorating. In addition, he failed to carry his people during the war. With this catastrophe, the Russians demanded for their voices to be heard and for a change in the government and as a result, war occurred within the country. Selfish people, like Nicholas II who kept all the power to himself, often affect others deeply, or foster terrible consequences. For example, one may take all the credit for working on a group project. Other group members will feel injustice and demand for credit to be given to them since they worked as hard as all the others did. Likewise, the Tsar’s decision to maintain power led to citizens rioting and the fall of his power. People should always think about their actions before executing them, or else the aftermath would be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II was a very poor leader for the people of Russia, he lacked leadership skills. His poor leadership qualities lead too many problems within Russia that were not dealt with efficiently. For example he did not trust the Duma, in 1906 the first Duma was introduced; after 72 days Nicholas dissolved the Duma as he did not believe in their policies and he did not trust them. This angered many people, Nicholas was not giving anyone a chance to speak and help him to change Russia.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The government and reform; the actual character of Nicholas II hindered his time in office, for example his outlooks on situations meant he did not trust a lot of his advisors, he was also seen to have been very lazy with respects to making decisions, other observations included him being, weak, timid and lacked guts. This all adds up to a very weak leader that is vulnerable to opposition, due to his tunnel vision and un-ability to see the main needs of the country. The duma was another challenge to the tsar; after the 1905 revolution the tsar had set up an elected body called the duma, this was a way of showing the public that he could be open minded in that delegating decisions to other people, looking back in hindsight this would also be seen as a challenge to the tsar as he never gave the duma any real power, and were easily dissolved, this meant that people were further angered and he was receiving opposition from all sides, it did however hold off opposition for a small period of time in order for the tsar to retain his power. Other individuals had an influence to the challenges facing the tsar, Nicholas had brought some new people in to try and conquer some problems, these included Rasputin who he had originally appointed to become saviour of family, he managed to influence the tsar in many of his decisions, this inevitably caused there to be conflict as the he was relying on Rasputin to relay details of the state of the country, these were not accurate which meant that tsar could not act upon opposition. Other people did help the tsar for example stolypin and his reforms.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The system of tsarism was based on the idea of absolute authority, where the Tsar - God’s chosen leader, possessed “unlimited executive, legislative and judicial power” (Perfect, Ryan and Sweeney, Reinventing Russia, A Study in Revolution). This system though had its flaws, for example allowing such an immense authority to the Tsar, caused their words to be law and were not to be questioned. The Tsar though was also to blame for the collapse of the autocratic system as Russia was a very large nation with “many nationalities, many languages” (Sergei Witte) that had been governed this way since Ivan the Terrible’s rule in 1547. It was both the outdated system and Tsar of the time that had caused the collapse of the autocratic regime.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia’s mistaken involvement in WWI, Tsar Nicholas II’s incompetence, and rising revolutionary spirits intensified into the massive, growing disparity between Russia’s ruling elite and its hopeless masses which eventually prompted the Russian revolution of 1917.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The inability of tsar Nicholas II to bring about effective reform was a fundamental cause to the eventual fall of the Romanov Dynasty. Years of discontent and ineffective or absent reform had resulted in widespread displeasure from the Russian public, and proved to be the catalyst for much of the protest and rebellion in the following years. However, whilst a prevalent factor, other events and issues of Russian society contributed to the decline and fall of the Romanov Dynasty…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They all complained and grumbled about the lack of inadequacy of the government. Nicholas called for the troops to shoot the abrupted people. However, they refused to and caused the tsar to be overthrown.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There have been many revolutions throughout history, but few are as mighty as The Russian Revolutions of 1905 and February 1917. Whilst there are similarities between the two revolutions, the differences are also notable. The revolution of 1905 marked an opening chapter to upheaval in Russia during the early 1900’s. It was merely a faint echo throughout Europe. The February 1917 revolution, however, immediately caused the abdication of Tsar Nicolas II. Similar circumstances and a common goal were evident between the two, despite having different outcomes. Even so the theme which is shared between the Revolutions is the discontent amongst the Russian people for their leaders.…

    • 1334 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This society naturally caused great dissatisfaction among the serfs. As the nineteenth century wore on, numerous reform and fanatical groups tried to change Russia's social structure and government. Revolutions, although suppressed, continued from time to time until two very important revolutions, one in 1905 and the other in 1917. Although these revolutions had two basic causes in common, civil rights and social discontent, they had very different results.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Revolution of 1905 was the first time the Tsar had faced open opposition from so many groups in Russian society at the same time. It involved peasant disturbances, strikes, naval mutinies, nationalist uprisings and assassinations. This essay aims to examine the different causes of the Revolution of 1905. Short and long-term causes will be considered, and economic, political, military and social factors will be discussed. The essay will also explain why the Revolution ultimately failed to overthrow the Tsarist regime.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Tsarist regime was moderately successful in terms of dealing with the problems in the government; they solved some problems in the short term but created more problems in the long term. An example of this is the Tsar created the Duma in 1905, this helped deal with the difficulty of ruling Russia in the short term because he gained the support that he lost middle classes by giving them a say in the government. This pleased the middle class because they believed they had gained an influence in Russian government, all the while Nicholas didn’t actually listen to them, he just pretended to. Nicholas was never interested in democracy seeing as he was an autocratic ruler. However in the long term he created more serious problems. By repeatedly dissolving the duma (e.g., in 1906,1907 and 1912) and by only giving them minor laws to debate (e.g. Setting up laundry) the Tsar destroyed the trust the middle classes had in him thus increasing opposition. There for the Tsar was successful, but only to a very limited extent, because the problems he created in the long term were even bigger than the problems he solved in the short term.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Russian Revolution that occurred throughout the year in 1917 impacted the future for the Russian people by putting an end to a form of government, which had a very small chance of being successful. The Tsars abused the power of the absolute monarchy, and this type of government encouraged the Russian Revolution. There was a large difference in wealth, education, and opinion between the common people and the aristocrats. The commoners began the Russian revolution because Tsar Nicholas II was a poor ruler who used traditional methods, the government did not have a presence in many parts of its vast country so some citizens did not feel the obligated to the government, and the citizens revelled in the failures made by the government in previous…

    • 321 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsar Nicholas II did not like to listen to his advisers, just as he was advised not to take part in World War I, yet ignored them. He lived in a bubble where Tsar Nicholas II thought that his people were happy, because he ignored all signs of anything other than this. Tsar Nicholas II was always against having a Duma, but agreed to having one simply so people would stop hassling him. Even after the formation of the Duma, the Russian people were not happy as only richer Russians were able to be apart of it. These people were mostly landowners who had different views to the peasants. Even though the Duma consisted of a more “civilised” part of the Russian population, Tsar Nicholas II still ignored their propositions, and made decisions for his benefit and for what he believed to be right. By ignoring his associates and his people, the hatred for Tsar Nicholas II grew, with more and more people seeing him as a leader who did not care for his people.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Peasants burned the estates of their landlords, destroying everything they could get their hands on." (As It Was Lived: 4-18) This was an accurate portrayal of the behavior of the peasants after the events of the 1905 revolution, also called ‘Bloody Sunday'. The causes of this were severe food shortages, deteriorating living standards, and the fact that the Tsar did not allow any political involvement of the peasants. Famines and land shortages caused suffering of thousands. Also, Russia was losing the Russo- Japanese war, where the Russian army endured a series of defeats as they were ill-equipped, badly-armed, and poorly trained. The corruption and inefficiency of the government were exposed. Transportation broke down and the prices of bread soared. The monarchy was totally shamed in the eyes of the Russians. To combat their living condition, the Russian…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Russian Revolution was a time of change. It completely changed the world with the fall of the autocracy and the monarch ruling without question and the first ever communist state. Through the use of ideology, the Bolsheviks could achieve their goal without the use of violence. The people involved would each play a key role in the revolution. The events that led up to the resulting violence at the end of the revolution were also very important to consider. The events towards the end of the revolution may be perhaps the most important of all. Through the examination of these various factors, it can be deduced that the Russian Revolution could be a movement of change.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays