Preview

Essay on What Political Regime Should Bulgaria Adopt

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1143 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay on What Political Regime Should Bulgaria Adopt
Bulgaria – presidential, semi-presidential or parliamentary republic? by Vera Dimitrova, 11114075

According to the political scientist Lasswell , politics is “who gets what, when and how”. Every country has different definition for “who” “what” and “how” and so different political systems are preferable. Since there is no formula for determining whether a particular regime is suitable for a particular nation, except maybe the experience, it is very hard for me to prescribe a good government for Bulgaria. Yes, the semi – presidential regime in France is a successful and stable one. But does that mean that it will be successful here? Bulgarians are very different from the French in cultural aspect. Yet, many believe that the Bulgarians are very close to the Russians. Does that mean that a semi – presidential regime in Bulgaria will be like the one in Russian which is, probably, the worst scenario? I don’t think so. The demographic, social and economic factors for every country are specific and that’s why taking in account the specific features of Bulgaria is crucial in defining the best political system for us. Let’s start with two factors having huge social impact on Bulgaria - the 500-year-rule of the Ottoman Empire and the communist regime. Almost 600 years of our late history the common Bulgarian citizens spent in obeying to the established rule and living with the decisions someone else made for them. For hundreds of years our will, individuality and creativity was surprised by the Ottoman empire and less than a hundred years after this rule ended – we adopted another one – the communist. The constant presence of foreign political pressure and the disappointment from the Bulgarian government made the Bulgarian skeptical and reserved towards the State. The low standard of life in Bulgaria compared to the one in the rest of the European countries doesn’t please the people either. Unfortunately, the Bulgarians are more prone to complaining than

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    When one thinks of presidents residing over a country, the most coveted powers come to mind, especially for United States citizens, where its chief has centralized command over important facets of the government. However, not all presidential systems are the same. For some, the title only bears a symbolic representation for head of state and nothing more. Other presidents find themselves sharing powers with additional officials. The most interesting comparison between presidential systems that have different processes of election and distributions of authority is the United States and France. The examination of the nomination process, voting measures, campaign spending, the media and debates will distinguish the election process. Only then is it fitting to compare and contrasts constitutional powers that each president holds and the shaping of these powers by the governmental system.…

    • 1480 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Xlandia Case Study

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Xlandia should have a written constitution as a reference to help explain the details of the new government. This will also limit manipulation of the law, and give a specific process for amendments. This constitution will establish a unitary system because Xlandia has a small population of about 8 million citizens, so local governments aren’t necessary for representation. Xlandia should establish a presidential system because it will work to eliminate corruption in the government. The rights of minorities and individuals should be protected by a written Bill of Rights in the constitution so that the liberties of citizens are guaranteed. While the civilian government should have authority over the military, it should be completely separate from local…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turkey and Georgia both have semi-presidential systems. A large difference between the two Governments is the amount of power the president holds. In Georgia, the majority of the power resides with the prime minister. The prime minister is the head of government with full executive authority over domestic and foreign affairs. The president is the head of state, but cannot legislate nor propose a state budget. By implementing these stipulations for the president, Georgia has decreased the corruption that is found within this branch. (3) Whereas, in Turkey the president has been directing them to a more authoritarian rule. He is cracking down on peaceful protesters, removing judges and prosecutors that disagree with him, and replacing the government with one that puts religion at the center of the people’s lives. (4) Although the prime minister holds the most power in the government the current president is trying to change that. He has tightened his grip on the judiciary, and implemented more restrictions on the media. He is also trying to pass a constitutional amendment that will give the president more power than the prime minister.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "History is something we make together", Orhan Pamuk once said. It is also something we enjoy together, I would add, because it is often a play of coincidences. Bulgaria is a beautiful country in Europe. The geographical location of Bulgaria is in the South East of Europe on the Balkan Peninsula. It has an interesting geography. It has mountains on the south and the middle and valleys in between. The entire border on the East is constituted by the coastline of the Black Sea. Romania is the border on the North separated by the Danube River. To the West is Serbia…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The government -controlled by a group of people- stands behind every nation’s failure and success. Its main purpose is to improve or maintain the wellbeing of the nations all over the world. The government’s duty is to protect, to ensure a place for home and means of living hood, and to keep peace between other countries. This is the reason why it is important to have the right leaders in our country. Every country has its own kind of government - based on economics, politics or authority - but there is a possible method to be allied with each other. The majority of people think that a great government is chosen by its citizens, which will allow changes and improvement. For example, when it comes to laws ,civilians do not want to have conditions…

    • 1639 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Today, the two most prominent forms of government are the Parliamentary form of government, often known as the Westminster system seen in the commonwealth nations; and the Presidential form of government seen in the United States. Throughout the years, many debates have been discussed over the question of which form is better; no definitive answer has ever come forward, for the exception that they are both quite different in theory and in practice. Principally, the difference among them is the separation power seen in the Presidential system, and the coexistence of power seen in the Parliamentary system; represented chiefly by party discipline. However, more than this difference alone separates the two. Both forms of government are characterized by how their power is distributed, how laws are created and chosen, party discipline and also the responsibility of each Head of State. Each system has its own dynamic and ever-changing functionality, creating advantages and disadvantages for each system.1…

    • 1624 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Parliamentary system in Great Britain and the Presidential system in the United States both have histories marked by an absence of abject failure, yet neither system can be considered truly perfect. Consequently, the analyst cannot conclude that either system is better; rather, he must recognize that there are merits and faults in both systems. The Parliamentary system tends to legislate efficiently, whereas a presidential system tends toward gridlock. However, the presidential system grants both elected representatives and citizens greater influence in government. The Parliamentary system tends to favor Prime Ministers who have much experience, whereas the Presidential system…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the fall of the Soviet Union 1991 many changes have been brought to Europe. After the fall of the Soviet Union newly formed countries of Eastern Europe found themselves brought into a new era, many of the people had relied on the Soviet Union’s system of socialism to help them with every detail of their lives and to dictate their lives but with this newfound freedom citizens had many changes forced upon them. All they once knew had been taken away so suddenly most didn’t know what to do with themselves. The Government, Economy and Marxist Idealism had all fallen with the Soviet Union. Citizens had no choice but to move on with their new lives because it was as their past lives had never even existed, but like every change it came with confusion and difficulty and left the people of Eastern Europe wanting answers to their questions and solutions to their problems. Despite the gear towards democracy that had begun under soviet rule, it posed a challenge for many countries of Eastern Europe. While Gorbachev held power, policies such as the reconstructing of the Soviet Union, and reducing the censorship of information this newfound freedom had the people eager for more. When the Soviet Union Collapsed, Naturally the people turned to democracy as their new form of government which would offer the freedom the people of Eastern Europe Wanted. Even thought they wanted a democratic nation they lacked many of the skills needed to achieve it such as, the ability to engage in “political discourse, the ability to compromise and many other things, which was understandable due to their socialist rule for so many years. Other frustration stemmed from the difficulty of transforming a socialist economy to a free-market economy. Though the people of Eastern Europe were optimistic, their optimism did not last very long. Between 1990 and 1994 Eastern European countries saw a huge jump in unemployment because of the fall of…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to be recognised as a new and independent country, such nation must be able to determine what system of government should be used. If the new country will choose the democratic form of government, there are two systems to be chosen. These include parliamentary and the presidential system. The main goal of this paper is to determine the pros and cons of parliamentary and presidential system in a new country.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bosnia is an excellent example of a country in transition. It used to be a part of a monarchy (Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slavs, later Kingdom of Yugoslavia) and a republic in a socialist country (Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia). Bosnia and Herzegovina finally became an independent country in 1990s. During the monarchy, Bosnia was primarily an agricultural region, rich with natural resources that had not been used. It remained underdeveloped and one of the poorest republics in Tito’s socialist Yugoslavia. As an independent country, Bosnia is currently struggling both politically and economically. It is considered a representative democracy, making its way to capitalism.…

    • 19418 Words
    • 78 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the revolution, Bulgaria was viewed as the satellite state in the Soviet Union; they were highly involved with communism until 1989. However, before the fall of communism in Bulgaria, the Turk Muslims, a minority at the time, were forbidden to speak their language and were forced to change their names from Islamic names to Bulgarian names. The leader, Todor Zhivkov, enforced all of this sanctions. Zhivkov had held power in Bulgaria since 1954 and was known to have murdered hundreds of opponents, mostly ethnic Turks. The Turks were being treated unfairly and couldn’t practice their religion or express their real identity because of insecurity. No one could tell the difference between the Turks unless they expressed their real name. Ionni Pojarleff, a physicist who lived in Sofia at the time said, “We were all oppressed together. But then from the mid-1980s the regime went for the Turks – and that changed everything.” (Sebestyen 184) Zhivkov forced assimilation upon the Turks and felt the need to ban education for the Turkish by closing their Islamic cultural centers. However, he claims that he was encouraging them to change with name and most all of them did by 1987. Three decades later, Zhivkov was still in power and the relationship…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many advocates for democratic socialism claim that it is designed to help the economy and will not interfere with capitalism. Capitalism is defined as an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state. As democratic socialism is based on regulation of the market by the government, it is impossible for it to coexist with capitalism. Democratic socialism is defined as a political ideology advocating a democratic political system alongside a socialist economic system. This means that while we would remain democratic in most parts of life, the economy would be regulated by the government. You may be asking yourself, why is this a problem? The answer is…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tsarist Government Essay

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is possible that Tsarist government survived because of the massive concessions Tsar made in August Manifesto and in, what was more significant at the time, October Manifesto. The concessions pleased only some of the opposition groups, so the Tsar got them on his side. However, there are many other factors, which helped the Tsarist government to survive. In my opinion, the most important factor that contributed to the survival of the Tsarist government was the military power and the fact that it remained loyal to the Tsar, in contrast with 1917 when after WW1, many soldiers died and many solders no longer wanted to serve the Tsar. So, the concession the Tsar made in 1905 wasn’t as significant as the army that remained loyal.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Albania, a small country located in Southeastern Europe, is a nation that does not have a true identity – its people are Muslim and Christian, it is a country that is both and poor, it is as much urban as it is rural, and has evolved from monarchy to socialism and now to fledgling democracy. In other words, Albania and its people have seen it all. The extremes of Albanian society are vivid, and underlying tensions are evident. But Albania is not "another Yugoslavia" – there is no doubt that the internal environment of Albania has been and somewhat continues to be tense, although the breaking point has never been fully reached. Albania is a country with a fervently tense past (especially during the Cold War era), yet many people do not know about it, and few would be able to find the country on the map. Despite its beautiful during, its plentiful natural resources, and its extraordinary tradition of hospitality, Albania has always been "the most isolated country in Europe and from World War II until very recently, one of the most isolated countries on earth" ("Real Adventures – Albania" 1).…

    • 2538 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How successf ul was the L Successes  Aaland Islands, 1921  Upper Silesia, 1921  Economic collapse in Austria & Hungary, 1922-3  Memel 1923  Greek-Bulgarian dispute, 1925 Failures Teschen 1919 Vilna, 1920 Corfu, 1923 The Successes Aaland Islands, 1921 Dispute over possession of the Aaland Islands between Sweden and Finland Took it to the league, and they decided Finland should have the islands Both countries accepted the League’s decision Upper Silesia, 1921  A plebiscite area with large numbers of Germans and Poles living in it  Voted to rejoin Germany by 700,000 to 420,000  League split it:  Germany got most of the land & population  Poland got most of the industry MEMEL 1923  Memel was/is a port in Lithuania.…

    • 625 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays