Essay Outline For Ain T I A Woman

“Ain’t I a Woman?”
Analyzing the Argument

1. What is the claim?-
a. The Claim is that sojourner truth deserves equal rights as White men and women
2. What is the main point the writer is trying to make? –
a. The main point is that she give a compelling case that she is well deserving of having Equal civil rights

b. Is there a clearly stated thesis, or is the thesis merely implied? -

i. My thesis:
1. My thesis is that sojourner truth is justifying that she deserves the same civil rights equal to white men of her time.
c. Is it appropriately qualified?

3. What support does the writer offer for the claim?
a. What reasons are given to support the claim?
b. What evidence backs up those reasons? Facts? Statistics? Examples? Testimonials
by authorities? Appropriate anecdotes or stories? Are the reasons and evidence appropriate, plausible, and sufficient?
c. Are you convinced by them? If not, why not?

4. How does the writer appeal to readers?
a. Does he or she appeal to your emotions?
b. Rely on logic?
c. Try to establish common ground?
d. Demonstrate credibility?

Claim:
Women just like her should have the same civil rights as white men. Even women of that were Ex-slaves should be treated equally. The thesis is clearly stated.

Support: Reasons why? As Black women, she is equal to white women
She has work side by side with men. She performed about the same amount of labor. When she worked she was required to do the same labor. She has bared the same punishment as male slaves.

Evidence: She states, “Ain’t I a woman?” She is a woman and she be treated just like any other white woman.
Look at her arms as proof that she has worked in the fields. No man could stop her from doing it either.
She worked just as much as her male counterparts. She was punished just as her male counterparts were whipped. (Implied) Intellect has not to do with basic civil rights that everyone deserves.

Appeals: To our emotions –
How she has cried out several times and no came to her rescue; when her children were sold off into slavery, and when she bared the lash as well. To our logic – The analogy of having a filled cup regardless of the size proves her point of how intellect doesn’t relate to denying women civil liberties. Utilizing Eve from the bible to prove her point on what women are capable of; since eve is consider the downfall of the world.
She uses anaphora throughout her speech, by repeating, “Ain’t I a woman?”
When she appeals to pathos she gets the audience to understand and share her viewpoint through her experiences.
4. How evenhandedly does the writer present the argument? Is there any mention of counterargument? If so, how does the writer deal with them? By refuting them? By acknowledging them and responding to them reasonably? Does the writer treat other arguments respectfully? Dismissively?

Counterarguments: Throughout her entire speech she continue to counter reasons why women shouldn’t have equal rights as men. First she mentions how white woman are treated as if they’re all damsels in distress. She counters that position by bluntly stating that she has never had that type of care and she herself is a woman. She goes and elaborates how she has done just as much and as male slave. Presuming that it has been implied that women are not capable of doing such. When she poses to the crowd what is needed again she refutes the position that intellect is needed to have the same civil rights as men. Through the analogy of filling cups, which shatters that intellect argument. The way she counter these many positions throughout her speech was ever so
graceful.