Ethical Code Of Ethics In Nursing

I have a disease for which there is no cure and no treatment. Like thousands of others across the world, I constantly seek for new opportunities, such as clinical trials, which may offer even slight relief. When enrolling in these measures, there exists a certain level of expectation of the researchers, their expertise, their product or methods, and their standard of care for patients. This trust exists today, in great measure, because of the ethical codes by which scientists pledge to abide: it guides their research, treatment of patients, and development of new procedures. I have no need to question whether I will receive correct treatment, nor need I worry about neglect: my doctors stand on principles of care, bound by law. Recent decades have brought great progression: not all were so lucky.
The Tuskegee experiment (1932-1972) left me highly unsettled. 400 black men
My plea for the scientific community is that review boards and ethics committees live up to the ethical codes as well! Promote beneficence: maximize our benefits and minimize our risks by actually allowing promising research to move forward. If a proposal meets all the ethical requirements, and it could truly have a positive impact, then please, do not punish society at large by postponing, denying, or otherwise encumbering its progression. If no harm is being done, if consent was given by the individual(s), if every safeguard is in place along the journey of discovery, and if that can be proven through the research proposal and articulation of the methods used in the field, then no problem exists and no questions of ethicality should be raised. Ethics are about more than preventing someone asking “Where was my cure?” Ethics are to avoid someone unduly waiting and asking “Is my cure discovered