Preview

Ethical Issues In Criminal Defense Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
742 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethical Issues In Criminal Defense Essay
Article Review 3
The Ethical Obligations of the Criminal Prosecutor

The Criminal Prosecutor has an extremely important role in the Criminal Justice system. Not only are they responsible for protecting the innocent, they also have duties and obligations towards the defendant as well. The Criminal Prosecutor has a duty to represent the community he or she is elected in, while the community demands that the individual protects the interests of the community, the criminal prosecutor has to defend the constitutional rights of the defendant. He or she also has to pursue the search for justice in a proper and fair manner. This article focuses on the ethics surrounding the criminal prosecutor and the role that the prosecutor plays in each
…show more content…
The three phases that the prosecutor is involved in are the pre-trial phase this includes, investigation, arrest, charging and arraignment; the trial stage which includes the fair search for guilt or innocence; and the post trial phase which includes sentencing, appeals and parole. Most individuals may not be aware but the prosecutor is involved in the investigation of crimes committed under their jurisdiction. More often than not their role begins at the crime scene. The criminal prosecutor has roles and obligations different than any other …show more content…
Evidence must be viewed with the following question in mind. Is there enough evidence to get a conviction? Cases must also be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. Is it more likely than not that the accused committed the crimes they are being charged with?

Last but certainly not least is the issue of Exculpatory Evidence, this obligation is extremely important. The rule of Exculpatory Evidence is simple. The rule asks “Is the evidence favorable to the defendant in a criminal trial, which clears or tends to clear the defendant of guilt”? If a Criminal Prosecutor comes across exculpatory evidence he or she must turn it over to the defendant before the trial, even if the evidence will bring about an acquittal.

The ethical obligations of a prosecuting attorney

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    R V Fraser Case Study

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Evidence must be gathered lawfully or else the prosecution is at risk of it not being able to rely upon in any consecutive hearing or trial as a judge could rule that the evidence is unreasonable.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1.07 Lab questions

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Evidence is important because it gives ideas of what happened in the crime. It also helps you determine the facts behind the crime. The beer bottle was a piece of evidence…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cross 9e TBB Ch07

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In a criminal case, the state must prove its case by a preponderance of the evidence.…

    • 2373 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Checkpoint #6 Cjs/200

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    First I will start off with the one who has all the authority, the judge. The judge is the one who makes all the rules. Next is the prosecuting attorney. The prosecuting attorney may also be known as the district attorney, state’s attorney, county attorney, commonwealth attorney or solicitor. The prosecuting attorneys duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on the behalf of the state or the people against those accused. The three main roles of the prosecutor are investigating crimes, to decide whether or not to instigate legal proceedings and to appear in court. All of the duties of a prosecutor may become too much for one person to handle so they supervise a staff of assistant district attorneys who do most of the work in the courtroom. The prosecuting attorney determines which cases to pursue by the amount of evidence that they gather. If the attorney cannot find enough evidence to get a conviction then they may make the decision to drop the case. Next is the defense attorney. The defense attorney is the one who represents the one being accused of a crime. Public defenders also represents those accused of crimes, however they are state employed lawyers.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is accountable for exhibiting the state’s evidence as well as presenting and preparing the state’s case against the accused. It is also the prosecuting attorneys responsibility to decide which matters should be tried or not. It is the prosecutor who makes these determinations based on a several sets of criteria. Most prosecutors will study the evidence against the accused, study the crime, as well as many other factors.…

    • 279 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The prosecutor is responsible for presenting the states evidence and preparing the states case against the accused. It is up to the prosecuting attorney to determine which cases should be pursued and which to let the charges drop. The prosecutor makes these decisions based on a variety of criteria. They will look at the evidence against the accused, the crime itself, the history of the accused as well as many other factors.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The domain of prosecutors has been extended to provide greater authority. An example of domain expansion of the prosecutors is improving police-prosecutors relationships. Truthfully, police officers and prosecutors are looked at as the bad guys in the eyes of the public. They are both to serve justice, even though they have different perspectives on the law. For example, the police officers consider a case to be closed when the suspect is arrest, but the prosecutor needs obtain more information and evidence to win the case in court. Prosecutors depend off of the police to obtain a conviction; this all depends on how the police officers investigate and the quality of their arrests. Although both police officers and prosecutors have sought strategies…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is somewhat an oxymoron to consider yourself a prosecutor and a good person. Paul Butler writes describing the discrepancies with progressive prosecutors who believes they are able to change the “definition” of a prosecutor. Butler defines a prosecutor as someone one who is “more part of the problem than the solution” and a person who is “geared toward punishing people whose lives are already messed up.” Furthermore, Butler qualifies his definition of a prosecutor by saying the job of some prosecutors is to “mitigate the harshness of the system.” This is a failed attempt to mend the system because their principal work applies the criminal laws instead of ameliorating its negative effects.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Frank Schmalleger said, “An attorney whose official duty is to conduct criminal proceedings on behalf of the state or the people against those accused of having committed criminal offences.” (Pg. 315) A prosecutor has too many duties for one person to take on so they hire assistant district attorneys who take over most of the court work. There are…

    • 682 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Courtroom Chart

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages

    | |trials. A prosecutor's job is limited to criminal |however, a prosecutor's client is the state and its |…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Is Oj Simpson Guilty

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    If everything is gathered and tested according to a set of rules, the defense attorneys at trial cannot challenge the evidence and get their client acquitted. Uniformity also should prevent innocent people from being convicted. As one of the characters on the show CSI said, the evidence will lead the authorities to the criminal. That is what properly handled evidence should do. Forensic science in the United States needs to be improved, regulated, and…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Courtroom Workgroup Paper

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There are three main roles that a prosecutor utilizes. These are as follows; investigating crimes, evaluating them to determine whether a legal proceeding should be initiation on the basis of the available evidence or not and then appearing in the courtroom. The prosecutor uses the prosecutorial discretion process. Through this process, the prosecutor evaluates filed charges and corresponding testimonies and evidence before…

    • 740 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecution Vs. Defense

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A prosecutor’s primary role is that of a minister of justice, and not simply that of an advocate in guarding the rights of the accused as well as enforcing the rights of the public (Tragos, n.d.). Of course, as a minister of justice and not that of an advocate, a prosecutor possesses the power of operating with few legal constraints regarding decision making, which accounts for the use of discretion. In contrast, defense counsel represent the accused of society, the role of the defense…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kathryn’s duty to do justice as the prosecutor, also applies during plea bargaining, whereby, a persons guilt must be established based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, the prosecutor’s primary objective “is to avoid punishing an innocent person. Because a prosecutor is obligated to act in all stages in the criminal justice process consistently with the sovereign's view that it is more important to avoid punishing the innocent, this principle applies to a prosecutor's efforts in resolving cases pre-trial” (Stern 1034). Regardless of how confident the prosecutor is of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor must ensure he does not offer a plea bargain that would result in an innocent individual to plead guilty as such an offer would subordinate the purpose of preventing an innocent individual from being punished to that of punishing a guilty individual, “thereby failing to strike the balance that justice requires” (Stern 1035). O’Hear suggests that a defendant should have the opportunity to convey their side of the story in order for the defendant to avoid getting convicted if they are innocent. It would also be beneficial to enhance the defendants perceptions of procedural justice by developing an objective criteria in order to direct plea negotiations and explain the prosecutors…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are many parts of the courtroom work group professionals who successfully pursuit justice and the process of convicting a criminal. The courtroom work group has a major role in convicting and finalizing a case. In the courtroom work group, there are three groups of people that hold the entire courtroom together. Without the work group, the courtroom would not flow, and coming to a conclusion to the case would not be as easy. The work group is made up of the Judge, the Defense Attorney, Public Defender, Court Recorders, and the Prosecutor Attorney. Which all are part of the courtroom work group which they work together to reach a decision, in the case by interacting among themselves and who’s involved an implicit recognition and rule of civility, cooperation, and sharing their goals. There are many roles in the work group, and if they are not all followed through with then the results could be different than what they should be. In this paper, we will look at the roles of the prosecutor, how the criminal justice funnel effects the courtroom work group and what will help eliminate the funnel and reduce the backlog of cases.…

    • 1422 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays