Ethical Issues In Minority Report

Minority Report is an alternative action/thriller film concerning a cop who is blamed for a future homicide. Based in Washington DC and set in the year of 2054, the police can stop murders before they occur with the assistance of three psychics. They utilize innovation to upgrade the dreams of these psychics, who are also known as the pre-cognitives (pre-cogs), to produce not just the name of the casualty and the killer but also the confirmation against them. The scene and the key factors of the murder location are expressed with a highly contrasted black/white picture. At whatever time the pre- cognitives dreams of the future murders are in action a Minority Report is created.
John Anderton is the Chief-of-Police of the PreCrime department. A few years ago, before he joined the PreCrime department, his only son was kidnapped by an unknown criminal, which drove him into joining PreCrime hence anticipating further loss of guiltless life. His confidence in the
The question I always thought about was “do we have a decision for our own future?” This question is unified with a religious undercurrent, as well as an ethical one. Is there an optional future for one estimated to conduct a murder? Imagine a scenario in which you knew your future was to murder someone. Like Anderton for example, we have a citizen who is focused on maintaining the law, and we ought to expect that he would not kill somebody, particularly in the event that he had past learning that he was to conduct it. However, before the end of the film, us audience discovers that there was no minority report created for his crime. His decision is to capture Jim Crow for the kidnapping and murder of his child, in this manner he is re-establishing freewill and making his own future. The message that this scene of the film conveys is that you can decide your own future and your freewill determines your