Preview

Ethics Essay, Plato and Aristotle and the Existentialists

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
409 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ethics Essay, Plato and Aristotle and the Existentialists
ethics essay

Plato/Aristotle/Existentialists By Amy Maddox

Socrates said, “No one ever actually chooses evil, they only mistake it for good.”
I do not agree with this theory. For Socrates, the key to a virtuous life was knowledge of the GOOD. He believed, if one knew the Good one would choose it. One always chooses the best of the options available. The question is what is the Good? He would say, evil is the result of ignorance, and that Wrong doing is involuntary. Evil doers must be educated, instructed as to what truly is the GOOD and then they will choose it. If people knew what was the right thing to do they would do it. We always choose what we think is the best or good for us. So, if someone chooses to do what we think is wrong, then that person made a mistake and must be educated to see the error. They mistook evil for the GOOD. But, I believe that there are many people that do commit evil doings, while truly knowing that they are in fact evil. Again, Socrates would indeed argue that these poor souls were somehow shown that these ways were the right ways or the “good” ways. I would love to believe that there is no evil in the world. But, I believe that there is evil within all of us, but it only comes out if we allow it.

When we speak of Authenticity, we must speak in terms of these four Existentialists and what each of their understandings was. Sartre stated that we are free to choose, but we are not free to refrain from choosing. Wouldn’t that then be choosing not to choose? Kirkegaard believed Authenticity was to choose and live by faith in God and nothing else. Heidegger said “stop being absorbed by your doings and retain an attitude that, things may mean something else than I expected.” I somewhat agree with Heidegger and his understanding. But I have to give my full support to Levinas, whose knowledge of Authenticity was to live by responding to the other as prior to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the book Nichomachean Ethics, Aristotle summarizes how ethics can be used to determine the best way for an individual to achieve happiness. After reading the text, there were a couple of themes that stood out the most to me. Happiness is a choice and with this happiness, friends are needed most of all.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    not teaching them better. While one might have been raised to know the difference between the right and wrong, who the person begins to associate himself with could change his/ her moral character. In The Nicomachean Ethics without virtues one can not be happy so a life lived making morally wrong decisions is a life that will not see happiness according to Aristotle. An example that best proves Aristotle’s thinking is one of a man losing his dog at a local park. The man searches all over for his dog, but his dog is nowhere to be seen. After hours of searching the man returns home. The dog did in fact run away, but a young mom and her two daughters stopped the dog before it can go any further. Attempting to find who the owner of the dog is,…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes we are asked whether virtue ethics can be understood by utilitarianism or Kantian moral philosophy, or if it is a distinct position. Taking a look at Aristotle’s ethics shows us that it certainly can be different. In particular, Aristotle presents us with an ethics of aesthetics in contrast to the more standard ethics of cognition: A virtuous cause can classify the right actions by their aesthetic qualities. Additionally, the person’s concern with their own aesthetic character gives us a key to the important role the emotions play for Aristotle, which further distinguishes him from the other two theories we have…

    • 102 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philosophers live and encourage others to live according to the rules of practical wisdom. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches. They investigated complex human actions and theorized what is the ethical thing to do. For instance, Aristotle contemplated the aim of human life, Kant observed duty and obligation from respect for the law, and Levinas examined one's responsibility to the Other. These unique points of view offer different answers regarding the search for the good. In addition to their differences, these philosophers are bound together by similar ideas. For example, each of the philosophers believed in optimism-- they thought that all humans are naturally ethical. In addition, each of the philosophers believed in using reason to be ethical. They emphasized the concept of living well and acting well by using virtuous habits and good character to reach the "good". Furthermore, they all believed in self actualization-- in other words, ethically being the best one can be. They all thought an ethical person must be rational and responsible for their actions. They proposed that each person has a duty towards others and society.…

    • 880 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates is a well know philosopher, who has given his opinion in many topics including the one about evil. Socrate's perspective on the nature of human evil is that morality is a term that refers to the creation of and to follow the rules that govern human behavior on the basis of some idea of right and wrong. Even though you might have a different concept of morality, to him it must help humans to be able to tell wrong from right. Socrates believed that nobody chooses to do wrong knowing that they are doing the wrong thing. He has always thought that if you do wrong somehow you are doing something harmful to yourself and that no one ever has wanted to hurt themselves in no way. To him because people are ignorant, is the reason why they do the wrong thing instead of the right thing. This means that it is impossible for a…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    are right and wrong no matter the content of the act. It should be completely wrong to not treat everyone with respect based on who they are. Race, religion, sex and even medical diagnosis shouldn’t matter. Plato was an absolutist and he thought that as well as things being right and wrong, he thought that goodness itself really exists even after life itself. The highest form, the form of goodness had brought up the question of ‘What is goodness itself?”. Plato thought that goodness itself was the highest form of reality, which is an objective or absolute thing that existed eternally, beyond our limited world. He valued goodness very highly, comparing it to having the same importance that the sun has. We can look at this as having values and realizing that everything is important and good as well as all people. All people have a meaning to our society. We are all different because if we was all the same, we would be complaining of how bored we was. Plato thought that every moral situation was either right or wrong, and that our minds which were “distorted between pleasure and pain” could not perceive circumstances correctly, because we could not…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Ethics

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics provides a sensible account for what true moral virtue is and how one may go about attaining it. Aristotle covers many topics that help reach this conclusion. One of them being the idea of mean between the extremes. Although Aristotle provided a reliable account for many philosophers to follow, Rosalind Hursthouse along with many others finds lose ends and topics which can be easily misinterpreted in Aristotle's writing.…

    • 1919 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Aristotle Essay

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A relativist would react to “What makes you happy might be one thing, but what makes another person happy could be entirely different, so do not impose your lifestyle on other people” by agreeing with the statement about not inflicting your lifestyle on someone else. Relativists believe you cannot urge morality on others. Even if it is someone who you share a primary relationship with, you can not make any judgement on what decisions they make. Relativists do not judge others, so if something very immoral makes you happy, a relativist can not impose on your choice of being immoral. Relativism says that all culture is good and all culture is bad; it’s the same thing as happiness, it can be good or bad but you can not judge a persons happiness whether it is good or bad. Overall, a relativist would never impose on someone’s lifestyle even if something totally different makes them happy, or even if what makes one happy is completely wrong and immoral.…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics and Aristotle

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A married couple, both addicted to drugs, is unable to care for their infant daughter. She is taken from them by court order and placed in a foster home. The years passed. She comes to regard her foster parents as her real parents. They love her as they would their own daughter. When the child is 9 years old, the natural parents, rehabilitated from drugs, begin court action to regain custody. The case is decided in their favor. The child is returned to them, against her will. Do ethics support the law in this case? Discuss.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ethics Essay

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The similarities between the three are that they determine good and bad traits about a person, and with the determination of their actions, it also determines the characteristic of the person which is virtue ethics. Utilitarianism is similar that finds the good in a person. One issue is that it avoids finding the bad in a person. With the deontological ethics the product of the action is good not bad. It holds acts that are morally obligatory for consequences made by human actions. The differences between the three ethics are, utilitarianism is an act that focuses on consequences. Virtue ethics is the character of a person not the actions of a person. Deontological ethics is a reflection of a person’s morality, which is ultimately a combination of that person’s attitude.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every person is born into this world with the opportunity to grow and realize his or her true potential. Aristotle believes that this is something everyone should work to achieve. No one intentionally wants to fail at being a human being and so people do whatever they can to continue to flourish. Aristotle’s philosophy favors ethical egoism because he believes that everything people do is in order to secure their own happiness in the end.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle provides the teleological approach of how to live well in his collection of lectures, Nicomachean Ethics. In Book II of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle presents his definition of virtue in which it is "a kind of mean" (N.E. 129). According to Aristotle, moral virtue is a means to an end, happiness. By using Sophocles's Antigone, I will support Aristotle's theory of virtue in which he reasons it to be a state of character between two extremes. A virtue that remains relevant today as it did during Aristotle's era is that of courage. By using Aristotle's account on what represents the virtue of courage, I will demonstrate how it could be applied to the dilemma the characters of Antigone encounter. Even his definition of justice is based on the notion that rule and legal doctrine should lie somewhere in between a spectrum of two polar ideologies. Nonetheless, Aristotle's statement, "virtue is always concerned with what is harder; for even good is better when it is harder" illustrates his belief that usually what is morally correct stands closer to the side of excessiveness than that of deficit (N.E. 136).…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    From the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle argues throughout the whole book about finding the best thing for human in life. But he had mentioned that before all, he has to talk about choices, the reason why finding the best thing in life is essential. In order words, we choose to find the ultimate goodness of our life. People always say, "they choose to do something because they wish so." According to Aristotle: not like an animal, human choose to do something voluntarily is for "the good" to pleased their life, which to live well in life, for example, we choose to have friends, to be honored with establishments; we wish to have these because we think this can give us happiness and polished our life better.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates developed many theories in regards with the political issues. He passes these onto Plato and from Plato to Aristotle. Each time these political issues were passed on they changed. Plato and Aristotle lived in the fourth century, BCE. They were both great thinkers in regard to philosophy and both had wonderful views. They both had different views on politics and philosophy. Plato supports the higher forms (Gods) and Aristotle supports the natural science. Now Plato is referred to as the first political philosopher and Aristotle as the first political scientist. There are a lot of differences between the two even though Aristotle was a great student of Plato. There are some similarities too, but first we will discuss the differences.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ethics Essay Aristotle

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle was born the son of a doctor in northern Greece. He entered Plato’s academy in Athens when he was eighteen years old and continued to study there for twenty years until Plato died in 347. Throughout this time Aristotle adhered to the belief that moral excellence or virtue (arête) will lead to happiness (eudemonia). It is in my opinion that Aristotle was correct in his beliefs that being a moral person and having virtue will lead to happiness.…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays