Preview

Euthanasia Dignified Right To Die Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1260 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia Dignified Right To Die Essay
Euthanasia, Dignified Right to Die or Vilified Individual’s Will?

In order to address the question presented, we must seek the definition of the word Euthanasia. “The act or practice of painlessly ending the life of an animal or a willing individual who has a terminal illness or incurable condition, as by giving a lethal drug” (www.dictionary.com). Also called Mercy Killing. In certain instances, individuals express their desire not to be put under a lot of pain and suffering whenever death is inevitable. It just seemingly looks right to state that is not an individual’s choice whether to live or die. Neither the Doctor nor the patient should be given that authority to some. However, if one wants to assume that our duty is to do what is right, we then must find out what is that makes it right in order to get a thoughtful decision onto finishing the life or a person. Supporting individuals’ rights to die with dignity must be supported because it will shorten the individual’s pressure over the situation he/she may be facing. It will lessen the pain of the family members who may have to live for a long period of time with the sadness of seeing their love one suffer. The remedy will lessen hospital costs and in addition will expedite
…show more content…
Disregarding the international community’s opinion that apparently focuses on morality rather than the claim of those few who are more inclined to accept the idea that if life is coming to an end then, they should be protected and supported in terms of choosing a painless way to end their lives. Religiously inclined individuals will completely ignore such a simplistic measure or going there where God may send us. They may consider that by suffering one is paying for his sins and those around them but the truth is, in general they do not consider Euthanasia as a moral

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    With that being said, there are two main types of euthanasia called active euthanasia and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia describes actively attempting to end a patient’s life by means of drugs or a lethal injection. Passive euthanasia is defined as removing or withholding a medicine or treatment that could have prolonged the patient’s life. Recently, there has been much debate on whether or not passive euthanasia is as morally wrong as active euthanasia. Some claim that passive euthanasia is not a direct violation of the basic good of human life, therefore it is morally permissible. They declare active euthanasia, on the other hand, is a direct violation, and therefore is not morally permissible. I will concede that this statement is technically true in a few rare situations, but in the majority of passive euthanasia cases, the patient is being taken off life support because he is tired of living and simply wants to die. And if that is the case, who’s to tell some terminally ill patient that he’s just going to have to live out his remaining days off treatment in pain and without hope. If a terminal patient wants to die, he should be accommodated not simply ignored. If some patients would like to refuse treatment, and live out the rest of their days naturally, that’s their decision too. It’s the patient’s life. Doctors should act on the requests of their patients, not what…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia means gentle or easy death for those who are incurably ill and in pain. So should a person have the right to take another person 's life or his own when he or she is incurably ill and in pain? That is Australia is trying to decide. The N.T already has passed a law that legalizes euthanasia in that state. Now other government leaders and members are in support of this are pushing for an Australian euthanasia law. Christian Groups and Anti-Euthanasia have seen euthanasia as a sin and a choice that no-body should make. Some doctors have taken ill patients life 's as a request from the patient should this now be openly done. Would you want to be kept alive, with little hope ahead, when you were in pain? Some might answer no, and those people should deserve the choice to end it when that pain becomes unbearable.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A patient should have the liberty of choosing to end their suffering. Although, it may see has an extreme option, is an option the patient should have the right. However, some doctor think that Physician-Assisted Suicide goes against the oath they made. According to the article” Doctor-Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List”, one of the con of this practice is “Violates the Hippocratic Oath”. Which was that every life is sacred, therefore, commanding respect. So, just because the patients give permission, doesn’t make killing right. Still, by respecting the patient’s wishes and taking him/her out of his/her misery, the doctor is respecting their life. Physician-Assisted Suicide helps the patients in many different ways like being prepare or ending their suffering. Physician-assisted Suicide helps them retain their dignity. Terminally ill, coma, or mentally competent patients are suffering every day. For some, the pain is so much, that they don’t consider themselves “living”. Physician-assisted suicide help patients properly said goodbye to their love ones at their own pace and at their own comfort. It gives them the opportunity to be surrounded by the people they love and the things they love. An article called “Doctor-Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List” by Nyln.org, it stated that “Physician-Assisted Suicide makes grief easier to handle” (Nyln). Since, everyone its inform of the patient’s…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Voluntary and assisted euthanasia is not a new phenomenon. End of life care for long term, short term, and terminal illnesses has always occurred. However, with advances in medicine, patients’ lives may be lengthened. For many individuals, end of life care is paired with pain and suffering. Does it have to be this way? If an individual has the capacity to make their own medical decisions, and wants to end their life, should we as health care providers deny them this? We can consider suicide as self-determined…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The right to physician-assisted suicide is a very controversial topic that concerns many people all over the world. There has been much debate about whether a terminally ill patient has the right to die with the assistance of a physician. Physician-assisted suicide is defined as a physician providing a patient with means to kill themselves. The doctor would prescribe a lethal dose of medication to the patient to end their life. From the Utilitarian standpoint, physician-assisted suicide is morally acceptable because the patients should be allowed to end there suffering, reduce the damaging financial…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    End of life medical issues are a very sensitive subject for doctors, patients, and family members. Some support the patients’ right to terminate their own life. Euthanasia loosely called physician assisted suicide is when one takes deliberate action to end life when faced with persistent suffering and certain death (Medical News Today, 2012).Many feel that patients should not have to suffer unjustly when faced with serious pain and debilitating illness. Often times it is just as difficult for family members to stand by and watch loved ones suffer. As someone that has witnessed both my grandmothers die on hospice care in the last six months, I know that watching someone die can be more painful than losing them all together. With as much compassion as I have for people in pain, I do not believe people have the right to end their lives whenever they chose. I oppose euthanasia and physician assisted suicide (PAS) because I believe that it is a doctor’s duty to keep patients alive, it may create financial and ethical issues when it comes to patients and insurance companies, and God should be the only one who decides when ones journey has been completed.…

    • 844 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Death, while a reality for all people, is still a frightening and unknown experience. That is one of the reasons that physician-assisted suicide is such a complex topic. However, when one is faced with the prospect of witnessing the suffering of a terminally ill loved one and watching them experience unbearable pain, despite the known fact that they will never again be healthy, the issue becomes less complex. Whether an actual experience or an imagined one, it is one of the worst situations an individual can endure. If offered the possibility to end the suffering and relieve the patient or loved one from pain, would you be supportive or would you leave them to suffer? Physician-assisted suicide could be the answer for the select few patients who meet strict requirements and who are in need of relief. Physician-assisted suicide refers to a practice in which a physician provides a competent, terminally ill patient with a prescription for a lethal dose of medication, upon the patient 's request, which the patient intends to use to end his or her own life. (Black) Here is where the controversy arises: should terminally ill patients have the right to choose when to end their lives? Due to the facts that physician-assisted suicide can be constructed to have reasonable laws that ensure it will not be abused and protect the value of human life, relieve suffering patients, and allow citizens in need to exercise their fundamental freedoms to the right of death, physician-assisted suicide should be a legal practice in the United States.…

    • 2127 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The concept and practice of physician assisted suicide is a highly debated topic in today’s news. People often question the morals of the physicians who practice euthanasia and there are some who believe that they should not even be considered doctors. Euthanasia is the ending of someone's life through a doctor's help and is still illegal in most countries. One of the most well known advocates for the practice of euthanasia is Jack Kevorkian, who has also been referred to as Dr. Death. He was tried and convicted of second degree murder, however his practice gained a lot of support from the publicity of his trials. Although he is responsible for over 130 deaths, Kevorkian is a hero in today’s standards because of his involvement in the practice…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Physician Assisted Suicide

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Should a person with a terminal illness be allowed to die with dignity, taking their own life with the help of a medical doctor? Many people believe that physicians should maintain a person’s life as long as possible. Dying patients and their doctors have the right to choose to discontinue any treatment that serves no purpose except to delay an inevitable death. Euthanasia is intentionally ending a life to relieve pain and suffering. According to Carrie Snyder, “As of 2011, active euthanasia is only legal in three countries: the Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg. Assisted suicide is legal in Switzerland and in the US states of Washington, Oregon and Montana (Snyder)”. Physicians should be allowed to help terminally ill patients end their lives to stop suffering and the prolonging of their death.…

    • 1683 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some individual’s health complications are too painful to think of prolonging. Individuals who are ill should have the right to decide whether they can bear any more or not. They should be able to decide whether it is worth living the few months they have remaining. It is hard to imagine how a terminally ill patient may feel knowing they’re dying. The thought itself is agonizing and I can understand how some may want to use physician assisted suicide to go in peace.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Therefore physician assisted suicide should not be seen as the ending of someone’s life but instead be seen as the end of someone’s suffering and pain. As a person, one has the constitutional and moral right to over his or her body. If a person decides to die with dignity then rather have to go through months of misery. Then that is their choice. If a patient would want to spare their family of hospital debt. If the pain is too much for them to continue. Then that is their choice over their life. The terminally ill person’s decision should be respected just the same as the healthy person’s decision is…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Doctor-Assisted Suicide

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To look at the right to die one must first question if it is compassionate to keep a person in a consistent state of suffering until they succumb to their illness? Suffering, disease, pain are all synonymous with deterioration, in this case, it’s deterioration of life itself. Euthanasia of a beloved pet is the ‘humane’ way to say goodbye in many cases due to our humanitarian obligation to preclude pain, this humanity should be extended to humans. Our society under the preconceived notion that death is a punishment that is only inflicted to those who have committed the greatest of crimes, or equally as dangerous, that death is a sort of tragedy. To protect the sanctity of life in a person whose quality of life is limited, they should be allowed to request to hasten their own death. Physician-assisted suicide does not denigrate life, it enhances…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antigone

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Group Paper

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia has been accepted both legally and morally in various forms in many societies. Euthanasia is one of the most complicated issues in the medical field .Many patients lives can be saved with new treatments and technology. But still it is unable to find cure to all illness. These patients struggle with physical and psychological pain. Because of highly cost treatments only few chance to have total control of their lives. Community should have compassion and respect to the patient’s decision whose life becomes unbearable.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays