Euthanasia Is Wrong
Do you think euthanasia is a morally a good action? According to MediLexicon's medical dictionary says that “Euthanasia is the intentional putting to death of a person with an incurable or painful disease intended as an act of mercy” In my understanding, it is mercy killing. Do you agree with euthanasia? If your parents suffer from seriously illness, you will decide to doctor cures or kills them. I think most of peoples will decide to doctor cures their parents and I will decide to doctor cures my parents till the last. In my opinion, I disagree with euthanasia because it is irreligious, it against the law, and it is the way to be abused.
Euthanasia is irreligious. The views of religions believe that it is sin because it is killing living being. …show more content…
The World Medical Association's Declaration on Euthanasia, adopted by the 38th World Medical Assembly, Madrid, Spain, October 1987, states “Euthanasia, that is the act of deliberately ending the life of a patient, even at the patient's own request or at the request of close relatives, is unethical. This does not prevent the physician from respecting the desire of a patient to allow the natural process of death to follow its course in the terminal phase of sickness.” This statement indicates that euthanasia is unethical even though there was some statutory exception. In Thailand, National Health Act, B.E. 2550 (2007) states “ A person shall have the right to make a living will in writing to refuse the public health service which is provided merely to prolong his/her terminal state of life or to make a living will to refuse the service as to cease the severe suffering from illness.” However, the views of law, this statement is wrong. In Legal consideration, this action does not do because the doctors know the patients have to be cured by them otherwise they will die. National Health Act does not conform to the law. It just involves with passive euthanasia but active euthanasia is wrong in Thai law. Euthanasia can do in The Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, and Oregon, USA however, it based on Due Care Criteria, Regional Review Committee, Burden of Proof, Residency not
Euthanasia is irreligious. The views of religions believe that it is sin because it is killing living being. …show more content…
The World Medical Association's Declaration on Euthanasia, adopted by the 38th World Medical Assembly, Madrid, Spain, October 1987, states “Euthanasia, that is the act of deliberately ending the life of a patient, even at the patient's own request or at the request of close relatives, is unethical. This does not prevent the physician from respecting the desire of a patient to allow the natural process of death to follow its course in the terminal phase of sickness.” This statement indicates that euthanasia is unethical even though there was some statutory exception. In Thailand, National Health Act, B.E. 2550 (2007) states “ A person shall have the right to make a living will in writing to refuse the public health service which is provided merely to prolong his/her terminal state of life or to make a living will to refuse the service as to cease the severe suffering from illness.” However, the views of law, this statement is wrong. In Legal consideration, this action does not do because the doctors know the patients have to be cured by them otherwise they will die. National Health Act does not conform to the law. It just involves with passive euthanasia but active euthanasia is wrong in Thai law. Euthanasia can do in The Netherlands, Belgium, Switzerland, and Oregon, USA however, it based on Due Care Criteria, Regional Review Committee, Burden of Proof, Residency not