Preview

Is euthanasia as a way of ending suffering wrong?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1219 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Is euthanasia as a way of ending suffering wrong?
Euthanasia as a way of ending suffering is wrong?

Euthanasia is the deliberate ending of someone’s life by use of medication. It is described as ‘a gentle and easy death’, but it is a very richly discussed topic and raises many debates. Currently, Euthanasia is illegal in the UK, but legal in Switzerland and other places. In the past 10 years, the subject of legalising Euthanasia has been brought up in parliament 6 times, but all attempts have been dismissed.

Some people would agree with this statement because they believe that life should never be taken using artificial means. Life is sacred, and to take it unnecessarily would be murder. If someone is looked after with proper, palliative care, then there would be no need for euthanasia. Doctors and nurses are there for saving people’s lives, and now because of Euthanasia, they are killing them, which undermine the commitment that they have previously applied. Now, because of euthanasia, doctors are granted the ability to kill, and if we cannot be safe in hospitals, which are places of care, where can we be safe? It is already unsafe for the unborn child in the womb.

Another argument against euthanasia is that it is against all moral teachings in society. It weakens society’s respect for the sanctity of life. If euthanasia was freely available everywhere, then people who might have not had a good day would take it, just for a bad day. If £45 could ease all your troubles, it’s a bargain! But this is wrong: all human life needs to be respected, irrelevant of age, religious background, race or gender. Killing yourself in any way not only kills your body, but your mind, your soul and it devastates those left behind. We, as human beings, must respect our lives. We shouldn’t treat ourselves as means for our own ends. We cannot use euthanasia just to end our ‘suffering’. To do that is to not respect our inherent worth.

However, people would disagree and say that euthanasia is right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The word Euthanasia derives from the Greek words Eu and Thanatos which means easy or good death. Euthanasia is is defined in the Oxford Dictionary as the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma[1]. Euthanasia exists in various forms, each one specific in its criteria. Firstly there is active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves the use of direct action in order to end the patient’s life whilst passive euthanasia is the withholding of medical aid in order to allow the patient to die naturally such as not performing life-extending surgery or turning off a life support system. The next distinction is between Voluntary and Involuntary euthanasia. Voluntary euthanasia involves the patient’s termination at their own request whilst involuntary euthanasia occurs when the patient is unable to ably make a decision and therefore a suitable person makes the decision for them. Indirect euthanasia involves treating the patients pain but with the side effect of death, the primary intention is often used to justify the outcome. This is often referred to as the doctrine of double effect and in reality is not considered euthanasia given that the real purpose of the treatment is pain relief and death is merely seen as the side-affect. Finally there is assisted suicide which involves a patient incapable of committing suicide themselves asks for assistance in doing so. Euthanasia is a controversial topic that contradicts the age old moral injunction “thou shalt not kill”[2]. But similarly denying patient’s of this choice is defying medical practice cornerstones such as the patient’s autonomy and promoting their best interests. Different countries hold varying stances on Euthanasia but it is currently illegal in the UK. Most recently the case of Tony Nicklinson, a man totally paralysed by locked-in syndrome requesting euthanasia, has come to the forefront of the debate. Given the right to take his case to…

    • 5500 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    By the completion of this lesson students will meet two objectives. Students will be able to identify the four life cycle stages of a butterfly. Also, all students will be able to list the stages of the butterfly life cycle in order.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simple principles of medical ethics are “to avoid harm”, “to do well”, “the right to act freely”, and “acting fairly towards the patient”. Doctors should try to save patient’s life instead of ending it. They have the responsibility not to kill the trusting patients, but give all their best to secure the life of their patients. Even if the patients are hard to cure, they should still try and not make euthanasia an option. Therefore, doctors do not have the right to decide whether their patients would live or die as long as their patients are alive, there is always a hope for curing. For instance, many European countries are legalizing euthanasia. Unfortunately, not only doctors, but also nurses are favoring euthanasia in the extreme…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dinkel, C. (2011, April 13). Welfare Family Caps and the Zero-Grant Situation . Cornell Law Review. Retrieved from http://legalworkshop.org/2011/04/13/welfare-family-cap…

    • 2759 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Diploma 3

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    a) communicating with our colleagues is very important besause it will reflect on how we work as a team. We should always respect our work colleagues and keep all agreements we made. This will enable us to come to work and work with people we trust, respect and can learn from. this will build mutial understanding of our job and will create safe and friendly enviroment to work in. This will also enable everyone to prevent conflicts or misunderstanding, as all kind of information are being shared between care staff, whether it is managers expectations regarding care provided or simply information passes about service users on handover.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1). Physicians have sworn an oath which does not allow them to take part in the killing of people. Individuals against euthanasia believe that physicians should not take part in directly causing death because they will not be able to keep it under control. Euthanasia would never be legalized without regulations and controls in place. If euthanasia were legalized then doctors would not be breaking any oaths or laws. Physicians are knowledgeable professionals who can provide their patients with all of the information needed to make an informed decision. Physicians should be treated with respect and not judged when they have not done nothing for you to think otherwise. The option of euthanasia would only be given to those who are terminally ill so that they can make their own decision and not prolong suffering and pain for themselves and their families. Gibson explains that “human life is sacred and it is wrong to kill another human” (2008, para. 3). Those against euthanasia believe that it devalues human life and we should only “[do] unto others as we would have others do unto us” (Gibson, 2008, para. 7). Euthanasia gives patients the freedom and respect to make one final decision in their life when they are not able to make any others. This actually shows that they value their life enough to not suffer unnecessarily. They want other to remember them when they were happy and not in pain. Euthanasia can also give patients a chance to donate organs which again shows that they really do value human…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Medical News Today explains euthanasia as the act of consenting to the termination of one’s life legally through a doctor. Although the general idea of euthanasia is thought of as assisted suicide, this treatment branches into several different aspects. There is passive euthanasia, which is more commonly found in Physician Assisted Suicide, and there is active euthanasia that uses lethal substances to end one’s life. The majority of controversy surrounding this topic is actually caused by the active form of euthanasia.…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The argument that has sent the world into a tailspin is whether or not people suffering from terminal or excruciatingly painful illness have the right to take their own lives by way of physician-assisted suicide. Proponents contend that what one does with one 's life is of no consequence to anyone else -- that it is humane to allow someone to be relieved of constant – if not unbearable – discomfort. On the other hand, critics claim that the act of euthanasia is nothing more than a fabricated form of murder. Indeed, both sides have pertinent points when it comes to understanding and assessing the conflict, but euthanasia supporters have a significantly stronger argument when considering the bigger picture. Clearly, physician-assisted suicide is not only the right thing to do for someone seeking such a decision, but it is ethical and humane for a physician to abide by the patient 's wish.…

    • 2793 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Euthanasia Ethical Dilemma

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Euthanasia is a social issue in today’s world because not only does it affect the lives of those who are terminally ill and/or comatose, and the physicians who have been entrusted with their care, but it also affects the patient’s ability to have control over their own life, whether they are aware of this decision or not, which is one of the reasons why euthanasia has become such a controversial issue around the globe. Caddell and Newton (1995) define euthanasia as “any treatment initiated by a physician with the intent of hastening the death of another human being who is terminally ill and in severe pain or distress with the motive of relieving that person from great suffering” (p. 1,672). Even though the concept of great…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Good morning/Afternoon students and Mr Cunningham. Today I will be talking about how Euthanasia should be legalised under certain circumstances. Euthanasia is the technical term for assisted voluntary suicide. Currently, Australia and many countries all over the globe do not allow Euthanasia to be administered to terminally ill or elderly. Firstly, although many people believe Euthanasia to have many negative impacts, it actually has many positive impacts. Secondly, The Netherlands, located in Western Europe successfully legalised Euthanasia in 1994. Additionally, if Euthanasia is not legalised the alternatives are horrifying.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The medical use of euthanasia has been one the most highly debated topics in healthcare for many years. Should you be able to decide when you want to die? Should physicians help patients who no longer wish to live die? To help gain insight into this highly controversial and fascinating topic, I have chosen an article from Santa Clara University. In this article, the author gave a beautiful example of an acceptable situation in which I believe euthanasia can be used. He explained that his first wife was dying of inoperable bone cancer. She had thrombosis, broken bones, and no longer had any control over her bowels. It was no longer a question of if she was going to die; it was a question of when. She had been suffering for two years and could no longer withstand the pain of her terminal illness. The authors have lobbied for a new law that would allow the use of euthanasia in the treatment of patients suffering from terminal diseases. Under their law, two different physicians would have to both determine that patient is dying from a terminal disease that can not be cured or successfully treated. As stated by one of the authors, Derek Humphry; “It’s me. It’s my body. It’s my liberty. It’s my life. And it’s my death. Let me have control.” If we have given patients the right to refuse feeding tubes and other life saving measures then why should they be stripped of the right to end their unbearable suffering. The biggest principle surround the use of euthanasia is autonomy, the right to self-determination. Some individuals argue that autonomy gives you the freedom to have another person intervene to take your life, while others argue that taking one’s life is a contraindication of autonomy as you are giving away your freedom. There is no doubt that this topic will be debated for many years to come. I personally believe that an individual suffering a terminal disease should be given the right…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This argument needs to be settled so people can either go through the process or not even have the option. If patients cannot obtain euthanasia then there needs to be more ways that will ensure patients less pain and suffering for them. IN the future, hopefully the Unites States will legalize euthanasia or find a better alternative than euthanasia that will allow patients to die with dignity. People of the United States and all over the world cannot live in fear of what might be right or might be wrong, chances need to be taken to understand and develop more. To end with is a quotes from “Doctor Death, Jack Kevorkian, and “My ultimate aim is to make euthanasia a positive experience.” (Euthanasia…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Euthanasia, comes from the Greek word meaning “good death”, and is the practice of assisted suicide with the purpose of relieving pain and agony. The people who opt for euthanasia suffer from an incurable and painful disease or are in an irreversible coma. Euthanasia has been the subject of much moral, religious, philosophical, legal and human rights debate in Australia. At the core of this debate is how to…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The topic of Euthanasia has been the subject of moral, religious, philosophical, legal and human rights debate in Australia for many years. According to the Australian Medical Association, Euthanasia is defined as ‘The act of deliberately ending the life of a patient for the purpose of ending intolerable pain and/or suffering. The great debates stems from two contradicting notions held within society: the right for individuals to choose to die with dignity when suffering and the need to uphold the moral right to life for every person. Currently, in Australia Euthanasia is illegal, however, there have been many countries that have recognised the need to allow an individual to…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Antigone

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Euthanasia is a topic that is rarely covered in the news. The moral ramifications of killing someone, even for the sake of mercy, seems too heavy of a topic for in depth discussion. No one wants to think about the day they will die, however when someone becomes terminally ill it can soon become their only thought. When pain and suffering enter this scenario, the option of ending a life more quickly may also enter the thought process. According to Life and Hope Network “9% of all deaths in America are caused by Euthanasia” 1 We are given the gift of life at birth. I believe Euthanasia is a violation of the most precious gift we are given… life…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays