Preview

Euthanasia, Pros and Cons

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1216 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Euthanasia, Pros and Cons
Euthanasia has been a controversial topic of discussion in the last decades, since, dealing it, we have to take into account the so-called right to life, which appears in many different declarations of human rights (Right to life, 2010) and which seems, or could seem, inherent to our species. By euthanasia we can understand “the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an irreversible coma” (Oxford dictionaries, 2010). Of course, it may be more complicated than this. A classification of euthanasia (Euthanasia, 2010) could be made by regarding to whether the person involved gives explicit consent, into these different groups: voluntary euthanasia, which is legal in some countries of the EU and in some USA states, non-voluntary euthanasia, related to those people who legally cannot decide to give consent or not (children mainly), and involuntary euthanasia, which is highly regarded as a crime in political terms. Besides, the division may go further if we think of passive or active procedurals. However, the one that leads to special considerations is that of voluntary and active euthanasia. Thus, in this essay I will discuss and analyze some argument supporting a legal status for this “good death”, others viewpoints against it and the space in between. First of all, it might be easy to find a wide range of arguments that defend this practice for the benefit of the suffering patients. Following the most basis statements of the International Declaration of Human Rights (Eutanasia, 2010), the euthanasia could be seen as an ethical action. How could this be inferred? Human rights are based on the defense of free decisions of citizens; therefore, the people who are suffering from terminal illnesses would have the liberty to choose everything related to their own body and to the way they’d like to live - or not. Furthermore, there is another point that can be argued in favor of it. Why do people have to bear pain of diseases


References: Aciprensa. 2004. ¿Por qué NO a la Eutanasia? http://www.aciprensa.com/eutanasia/noeutanasia.htm. Date accessed: 11/07/2010. Consejo General de Colegios Oficiales de Médicos de España. 2008. El Comité Permanente de Médicos Europeos se pronuncia sobre la eutanasia. http://www.cgcom.org/noticias/2004/09/04_09_27_eutanasia. Date accessed: 11/07/2010. Eutanasia. 2010. Wikipedia. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eutanasia. Date accessed: 11/06/2010. Euthanasia. 2010. Reasons for euthanasia. http://www.euthanasia.com/reasonsforeuthanasia.html. Date accessed: 11/07/2010. Euthanasia. 2010. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia. Date accessed: 11/06/2010. Oxford Dictionaries. 2010. Euthanasia. http://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entry/m_en_gb0277070#m_en_gb0277070. Date accessed: 11/06/2010. Right to life. 2010. Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_life. Dated accessed: 11/06/2010.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Active Euthanasia
    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of Active Euthanasia

    I believe euthanasia can be the most humane option for those suffering enough if the patient chooses it. I would say I am for active euthanasia. Passive euthanasia in some circumstances seems less humane than active because with passive the person is left to die slowly from lack of treatment or sustenance whereas active would put an instant relatively painless end to the pain. Active euthanasia should be administered only in special circumstances where the suffering is great and the patient has little time left to live. It needs to be distinct from suicide.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Active Euthanasia with parental consent
    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Active Euthanasia with parental consent

    Euthanasia, the ‘mercy killing’, has definitely been one of the most difficult ethical dilemmas. Euthanasia is defined “an action or an omission, aimed at and causally implicated in, the death of another for her/his own sake” (Foot, 1997, as cited in Robert, 2004, p. 145). Euthanasia differs from murder, because the action causing the death is for the sake of the person to be killed. Someone might say that the person wanted to die anyway, so why ending his or her lives can be wrong? Is active euthanasia –acting to end the life of another- ever a right moral action? It is not an easy debate whether it is right or wrong to help end someone’s life. Some people might argue that active euthanasia is morally wrong, because there is no objective measure of suffering (Robert, 2004). It can, however, be said that active euthanasia can also be justifiable, because it is to end the person’s misery. The purpose of this paper is to debate whether active euthanasia is ever permissible. This will be accomplished by analyzing the case study: “Active Euthanasia with Parental Consent” (Robert, 2004, p. 153) and providing the best possible moral resolution. The paper will then discuss conclusion.…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Phi 208: Ethics And Moral Reasoning
    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Phi 208: Ethics And Moral Reasoning

    Euthanasia means “good death” but today the term is deemed as a merciful action to rid someone of suffering. In many cases we have seen terminally ill patients euthanized active or passive, yet for the sake of my essay I will discuss active euthanasia. End of life issues is a topic many families are faced with everyday more than one likes to imagine; however, imagine that you were a significant other who has a loved one in the hospital suffering from a terminal illness and their pain is unbearable that your loved one has decided to end his life and the subject of euthanasia comes up. What would you do? The…

    • 1769 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reg Crew Euthanasia
    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reg Crew Euthanasia

    The main argument for euthanasia to be legal is that many people believe that everyone should have the right to decide when they want to die. Many argue that because we can determine the course of our lives by our own free will, we have the right to live our lives and determine our own course. It then follows that we also have as human beings, the fundamental right to determine how we die. The argument of people who are very anti-euthanasia is that euthanasia is immoral because life must be preserved and protected. For something to be immoral, it would have to violate moral laws or norms. The preservation of life is, however, the decision of the patient who has full control and not the physician.…

    • 350 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia
    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Euthanasia

    Euthanasia is another term for mercy killing. It is said to be the act of putting to death painlessly a person suffering from such incurable or painful disease. Meanwhile, in the 21st century it has been argued that euthanasia is one of the famous social concerns nowadays. Moreover, it is usually done by doctors to their patients who are terminally ill. Although euthanasia ends the suffering of the patients, it can damage the teachings of some religions, principle of medical ethics, and the patients trust.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Euthanasia
    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Legalizing Euthanasia

    Euthanasia is very controversial and in most countries illegal. Even though it is illegal there are a lot of people who think that it should be legalized. Euthanasia is when a medical professional administers medicine that will end the patient`s life. People would make the option to have this done if they were suffering or if they had someone in their life who come make the decision for them when they could not , then that person would. This would put them out of their misery and they would pass away shortly after.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Active And Passive Euthanasia Summary
    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Active And Passive Euthanasia Summary

    Euthanasia has recently been an active topic of debate due to elevated rate of patients diagnosed with painful and incurable illnesses. In James Rachel’s article, “Active and Passive Euthanasia,” he speaks of the invalid and impractical practice of passive euthanasia, which is endorsed by the American Medical Association. For many that are unfamiliar, euthanasia is the practice of painlessly killing a patient who is suffering for a painful and incurable disease. Rachel emphasises the unclear difference between active and passive killing in the medical world. The topics I would like to analyze from the article are first, the difference between active and passive euthanasia and the many relevant and irrelevant factors associated…

    • 1167 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rough Draft On Euthanasia
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rough Draft On Euthanasia

    The population of people can be either mentally, physically, emotionally and spiritually suffering into pain. We all have different perspectives we can choose to suffer death or have assisted-suicide likewise, snapping your fingers at the instant death. I believe that we do need to euthanasia. I will set reasons why we can be for and against euthanasia. In the hope that, euthanasia it’s needed and follow to have less painful moments.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Arguments Against Euthanasia

    Euthanasia the assisted killing of a terminal patient is a controversial topic that medical professionals cannot avoid. Many health professionals face the ethical dilemma of whether or not they should end a patient’s misery. Patient’s rights are always the top priority, doctors are taught to find every possible way to treat and cure the patient, but the possibility of the patient being irremediable to what extent is the health care professionals willing to go to give the patient their wishes?…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Effects of the Death with Dignity Act
    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Effects of the Death with Dignity Act

    Euthanasia not only gives the patient the opportunity to stop their suffering, it also gives them autonomy. According to Thomas Preston, professor of medicine, a retired cardiologist and a former board member of Compassion in Dying “society must protect the right of terminally ill patients to choose euthanasia.” (Euthanasia 53) By euthanasia being legal, we have been unconsciously giving the patient the autonomy of whether they want to continue living or not. We as human beings can only perceive the outside of a person, however, we could never really know what they may be going through or suffering. Sometimes, individuals are so self-centered that would prefer to have their loved ones alive and in pain than giving them the freedom to choose between life and death. After all, each person is the owner of his or her life and should be able to decide what is best for them.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Justice vs Charity
    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Justice vs Charity

    Generally speaking there is a moral distinction between an act and an omission. In dealing with euthanasia, it is rational to think that the active euthanasia is further morally wrong than passive euthanasia. One would never be able to create a morally absolute rule that could address all life and death situations. Conversely, what if it is in one's most immediate interest to be relieved of their life, but they choose not to do so? Finally, how is one supposed to know whether a person wishes to live or die if that person can't communicate that thought? Using the ideals of morality and modern ethical questions, certain struggles in the field of euthanasia arise: active versus passive euthanasia, and the questions of how to deal with involuntary and non-voluntary euthanasia. Rachels sets out to contend that we are only able to answer these questions if we analyze the importance of two major factors concerning life: justice and charity.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dignity In Dying Arguments Against Euthanasia
    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dignity In Dying Arguments Against Euthanasia

    This essay will discuss the topic of euthanasia which according to the NHS is “the act of deliberately ending a person’s life to relieve suffering.” The arguments from both sides are strong and passionate. I believe that people should have the choice to end their own lives if they are suffering from an incurable pain that will slowly kill them. However, this is where the arguments start “what if the person is in a coma and he or she can’t choose to end it?”, “what if he or she is pressured into it” these are valid arguments and there is no question that when it comes to this topic the waters get muddy so to speak. Personally, I believe that it should be within the rights of a person to end their suffering.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Voluntary Euthanasia
    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Voluntary Euthanasia

    Brock’s overall thesis states that good reasons to allow voluntary active euthanasia exist. And that no compelling reasons to deny voluntary active euthanasia exist, if it is well regulated. His argument is guided by a few key principles. Patients…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Voluntary Active Euthanasia
    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Voluntary Active Euthanasia

    Euthanasia is a commonly debated topic in today’s society with countless numbers of citizens who support or are against euthanasia. Citizens have various reasons as to why they are for against euthanasia and whether or not it is moral. In this paper I will argue that euthanasia is moral, because every citizen's has a right to self-determination and one’s decisions to euthanasia himself or herself is their right according to self-determination. Therefore, euthanasia should be legal when it is voluntary active euthanasia. Dan W. Brock’s article Voluntary Active Euthanasia will be used in this paper as a source of support for my argument that euthanasia should be legal.…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Research Paper on Euthanasia
    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Research Paper on Euthanasia

    One of the most hotly debated ethical issue of our time is one of Euthanasia. Euthanasia comes from the Greek words “Eu”, meaning well or easy, and “Thanatos”, meaning death. In modern terms it is the intentional premature termination of another’s life by direct intervention or by withholding care.[1] Within that it can be either voluntary (expressed or implied consent), or involuntary. The two sides of this debate are the rights of an individual to decide when he or she is to die, or the sanctity of life and the states responsibility to protect people.…

    • 2719 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics