Euthyphro And Crito Analysis
True Guardian in Republic, Euthyphro and Crito
In the Republic, Socrates creates an imaginary world which is completely different from that time’s Greece. He defines a new type of rulers called true guardians who are supposed to rule this new world and fully determines their characteristics and calls them philosopher – king. Because Socrates is also a philosopher, in a deep analysis, based on the Republic, Euthyphro and Crito, I will look for whether Socrates fits his own description of a true philosopher or not.
First of all, Socrates says that philosophers “…love all such learning and are not willing to give up any part of it, whether large or small, more valuable or less so” [Republic, p.159, 485b]. For him, …show more content…
being lover of any kind of learning is the major characteristics of a true guardian. Anyone, who is deprived of the true knowledge, of course, cannot be a guardian; they are blind and inferior man [Republic, p.158, 484d]. Accordingly, in the Euthyphro, it is clear to see how Socrates is eager to learn something, “Tell me then, what is the pious, and what is the impious, do you say?” [Euthyphro, p.6, 5d]. In order to acquire the truth he always asks Euthyphro questions in dialectic way although Socrates knows Euthyphro does not know anything. But the love of true knowledge and learning that Socrates has and illustrates in this dialogue by making an effort, shows an aspect that Socrates is a true philosopher who is to work his way from ignorance (as Euthyphro does continuously) to belief to true belief and finally to knowledge. However, the inconclusiveness of the dialogue indicates that Socrates and Euthyphro could not reach the true knowledge which a true philosopher always searches for.
Next, Socrates says that “we should establish as guardians who are clearly capable of guarding the laws and the ways life of the city” [Republic, p.158, 484d].
This is a very essential point that can be also considered in the short dialogue, Crito. For Socrates, integrity, institutions and laws are the most precious possessions of mankind so that a true guardian must respect and obey the rules of the city. In the dialogue, though Crito tries to persuade him to escape from the prison, Socrates argues that this action would be wrong because if he escapes from the prison, he will conflict with his whole life’s work. Socrates says that “the most important thing is not life, but the good life” [Crito, p.51, 48b] which shows us, he will dedicated his life to the goodness and justice. Then he cites that in any circumstance “wrongdoing and injustice is in every way harmful and shameful to the wrongdoer” [Crito, p.52, 49b], so although Athenians unjustly accused Socrates, as he is a true philosopher, he will not break the rules and escape and do a wrong, unjust movement. In addition, Socrates explains to Crito that the law has already given him a long and successful life [Crito, p.54, 51d – e] and attests to the fact that he actually owes the city
much.
Moreover, Socrates expresses that “you must either persuade it (city) or obey its orders, and endure in silence whatever it instructs you to endure, whatever blows or bonds, and if it leads you into war to be wounded or killed, you must obey” [Crito p.54, 51b]. This statement covers that a true guardian, who searches for justice and wisdom in his all time and all life, couldn’t be afraid of death which overshadows his path to the justice as he states that obeying the rules is a kind of goodness. Rulers need to stand bravely (not escaping from prison and facing the punishment), in order to find goodness. So that, Plato definitely rejects cowardice and slavishness, where he signifies that “then it seems a cowardly and slavish nature will take no part in the philosophy” [Republic, p.160, 486a – b]. Through my analysis based upon Republic and short dialogues of Socrates with Euthyphro and Crito, I conclude that Socrates has the features of a complete true guardian. The theoretical characteristics of the true guardian such as the eagerness to true knowledge and learning, loyalty to the city laws and bravery referred in the Republic, come into the scene and realized by the attitudes, of Socrates in the dialogues.
In the Republic, Socrates creates an imaginary world which is completely different from that time’s Greece. He defines a new type of rulers called true guardians who are supposed to rule this new world and fully determines their characteristics and calls them philosopher – king. Because Socrates is also a philosopher, in a deep analysis, based on the Republic, Euthyphro and Crito, I will look for whether Socrates fits his own description of a true philosopher or not.
First of all, Socrates says that philosophers “…love all such learning and are not willing to give up any part of it, whether large or small, more valuable or less so” [Republic, p.159, 485b]. For him, …show more content…
being lover of any kind of learning is the major characteristics of a true guardian. Anyone, who is deprived of the true knowledge, of course, cannot be a guardian; they are blind and inferior man [Republic, p.158, 484d]. Accordingly, in the Euthyphro, it is clear to see how Socrates is eager to learn something, “Tell me then, what is the pious, and what is the impious, do you say?” [Euthyphro, p.6, 5d]. In order to acquire the truth he always asks Euthyphro questions in dialectic way although Socrates knows Euthyphro does not know anything. But the love of true knowledge and learning that Socrates has and illustrates in this dialogue by making an effort, shows an aspect that Socrates is a true philosopher who is to work his way from ignorance (as Euthyphro does continuously) to belief to true belief and finally to knowledge. However, the inconclusiveness of the dialogue indicates that Socrates and Euthyphro could not reach the true knowledge which a true philosopher always searches for.
Next, Socrates says that “we should establish as guardians who are clearly capable of guarding the laws and the ways life of the city” [Republic, p.158, 484d].
This is a very essential point that can be also considered in the short dialogue, Crito. For Socrates, integrity, institutions and laws are the most precious possessions of mankind so that a true guardian must respect and obey the rules of the city. In the dialogue, though Crito tries to persuade him to escape from the prison, Socrates argues that this action would be wrong because if he escapes from the prison, he will conflict with his whole life’s work. Socrates says that “the most important thing is not life, but the good life” [Crito, p.51, 48b] which shows us, he will dedicated his life to the goodness and justice. Then he cites that in any circumstance “wrongdoing and injustice is in every way harmful and shameful to the wrongdoer” [Crito, p.52, 49b], so although Athenians unjustly accused Socrates, as he is a true philosopher, he will not break the rules and escape and do a wrong, unjust movement. In addition, Socrates explains to Crito that the law has already given him a long and successful life [Crito, p.54, 51d – e] and attests to the fact that he actually owes the city
much.
Moreover, Socrates expresses that “you must either persuade it (city) or obey its orders, and endure in silence whatever it instructs you to endure, whatever blows or bonds, and if it leads you into war to be wounded or killed, you must obey” [Crito p.54, 51b]. This statement covers that a true guardian, who searches for justice and wisdom in his all time and all life, couldn’t be afraid of death which overshadows his path to the justice as he states that obeying the rules is a kind of goodness. Rulers need to stand bravely (not escaping from prison and facing the punishment), in order to find goodness. So that, Plato definitely rejects cowardice and slavishness, where he signifies that “then it seems a cowardly and slavish nature will take no part in the philosophy” [Republic, p.160, 486a – b]. Through my analysis based upon Republic and short dialogues of Socrates with Euthyphro and Crito, I conclude that Socrates has the features of a complete true guardian. The theoretical characteristics of the true guardian such as the eagerness to true knowledge and learning, loyalty to the city laws and bravery referred in the Republic, come into the scene and realized by the attitudes, of Socrates in the dialogues.