Preview

Socrates In The Clouds Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
739 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Socrates In The Clouds Analysis
Inside the pages of the Greek poet Aristophanes’ Clouds, the reader will find a drastically different portrayal of the philosopher Socrates than one would inside the pages of the Republic. In the play, Socrates is completely unaware of his surroundings, and is able to justify purposely making just actions stronger than just actions. The main character, Strepsiades, initially seeks the help of Socrates because he knows Socrates will provide him with the skills to avoid paying back his debts to the city. Even though Plato’s Socrates in The Republic would probably not agree, the philosophic life described in books V-VI of The Republic resembles the philosophic life demonstrated by Aristophanes’ Socrates in the Clouds.
According to Aristophanes in the comedy Clouds, the philosopher’s way of life is merely to acquire as much
…show more content…

In book V, Socrates says that philosophers are “insatiable in their approach to learning” (475c). Adeimantus continues and says that those who are brought up in the philosophical life “become quite queer, not to say completely vicious” (487d), and the men in Aristophanes’ Thinkery are quite queer indeed. Socrates also presents the philosopher in the image of the “Ship’s Captain”, in which the philosopher will not rule unless he is asked (488a). Plato and Aristophanes both would most likely agree that the philosopher seeks out knowledge in all things, but they do not seem to agree whether that is a good thing or not. Socrates in The Republic seems to want what is best for the city politically, which he believes would be the philosopher-king. Aristophanes uses Socrates’ lack of political involvement to show that what is best for the city is to follow ancient custom and education in order to continue the traditions of the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    After reading "The Speech of Callicles" I noticed that Philosophers were not what I originally thought they were. I have always pictured them being men who were ahead of there time. Who were searching for the answers to life. In the first paragraph these beliefs I once had about philosophy were changed. Callicles states that Philosophers would get into pointless arguments about the problems of everyday life rather than look for the truth. They would also attempt to make a man who doesn't study philosophy but studies practical affairs second guess himself. No matter what side of the argument the man would speak about the philosopher would take the other side. The distinction made in paragraph one is that nature and custom are antagonistic to each other. Nature being the order and behavior of all living things that make up the universe, and custom meaning the everyday habits that have fallen upon society. I feel that they are…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Aristophanes’ play, “clouds”, there is a battle between the “old” and “new” way of going out about life. This can be seen through the “just” and “unjust” speech, whose argumentative outcomes dictate the way in which society should go about educating its citizens. The “unjust speech”, which is a heavy logical and manipulative approach to thinking about life (“new”), seems to subvert the “just speech”, which appears to rely on moral and mythical justification (“old”). Pericles, a prominent and influential Politian in Athens, has argued that democracy is the best form of government because it fairly produces the most educated and excellent citizens, through freedom to act as they please, which will eventually shape there soul into a great person (Warner 145). Thus, if citizens are allowed to wonder freely and be tolerated with respect by fellow citizens as Pericles describes, and if Socrates (a Greek philosopher) and the “thinkry” spread their “unjust speech” rhetoric, Pericles’s platform for greatness will not make the Athenians the most excellent and educated citizens. In fact it is going to make them into worse people, people who are going to fundamentally question the value of their institution. Ultimately, Aristophanes suggests that democracy cannot work in unison with “unjust speech”, which undermines Pericles argument that “unjust speech” should be tolerated under democracy, because “unjust speech” uses its persuasive power to disassembles the collective wisdom democracy has built and allows the few who understand its power to create an unequal society (West). Aristophanes argues if a democracy is faced with a society of unequal powers then it could transform the democratic system Pericles drew up, where all powers were to be divided equally among citizens, into an oligarchy or tyranny, with the citizens using…

    • 2144 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CLCV 114 EXAM 2

    • 2213 Words
    • 10 Pages

    wrote The Clouds, The Frogs, Lysistrata, old comedy, native Athenian, attacks politicians, harsh critic of various governments…

    • 2213 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Strepsiades Unjust Speech

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Initially, in the play, Strepsiades is a man who lacks moral understandings of what is right or wrong. With the help of Socrates and the Thinkery, Strepsiades is able to get rid of the moderation and asceticism in his lifestyle, and is able to prosper from learning the just and unjust speech. Although, since Socrates only uses the practical wisdom of philosophy, he hinders Strepsiades’s knowledge of knowing the right and wrong. By just applying practical wisdom it adds justice to the unjust speech and does not create a balance for both speeches.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Republic, Socrates creates an imaginary world which is completely different from that time’s Greece. He defines a new type of rulers called true guardians who are supposed to rule this new world and fully determines their characteristics and calls them philosopher – king. Because Socrates is also a philosopher, in a deep analysis, based on the Republic, Euthyphro and Crito, I will look for whether Socrates fits his own description of a true philosopher or not.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Platonic literatures seem to hold many ideologies in common that are often briefly discussed throughout his writings. Plato, being the pupil of Socrates, felt his ideas were important and documented them in both the Meno and The Republic. In doing so, we now have some of the most influential ideas of Socrates to study. Although the Meno and The Republic are two unequivocal different literary works from Plato, they bear superficial similarities in the dissecting of Epistemology and the sacredness of one’s knowledge while differing in the utilization of the soul as a knowledge-bearing fruit or just as another tool used to aid in learning, or rather the origination of knowledge in itself. Epistemology is a stem of philosophy in which…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Clouds by Aristophanes

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    * Strepsiades is a practical man: he has a problem—he is in debt—and he finds an existing solution for it in the theories and arguments taught at Socrates's school. In spite of the fact that he places his hopes on the slippery rhetoric and shady morals of the new sophistry and "new education," Strepsiades is a countryman and a traditionalist at heart. He wishes that his son Pheidippides were a farmer like him and his father before him.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Clouds Analysis

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aristophanes’ play, The Clouds, provides an illustration of the “new” style of education in Athens compared to that of the “traditional” style. It is a satirical comedy that pokes fun at the ideas and philosophies the sophists upheld. What is interesting is that the Socrates is portrayed as the leader of this educational movement. His teachings, while similar to the ones referred to in the play, aren’t necessarily in sync with Plato’s accounts of his mentor, Socrates. Considering Aristophanes motivations when writing this play were surely for entertainment purposes, it is safe to assume that this isn’t a historically accurate work to draw our understanding of Socrates and his teachings among the Athenians. Nonetheless, it were works like The Clouds that perhaps could be responsible for labeling Socrates in such a negative light as a “corrupter of the youth.”…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Often perceived by the characters as acts stricken upon them by malevolent gods. We can see this no more clearly, in what may have been Socrates most tragic figures, in Oedipus Rex. Oedipus, throughout the play, is portrayed as a just and noble human being. Making decisions based upon the situation at hand. No question is posed as to challenge the morality of his decisions, as they appear to all involved as motivations in line to Oedipus's character type. A leader. Noble. Ingenious. Trusted. You do not doubt the clarity of character that Oedipus is when we begin the play. We are treated to a display of bravado from Oedipus when he declares to The Chorus "You pray to the gods? Let me grant your prayers."(1) In "The Guilt of Oedipus" P.H. Velacott states "In none of these do we find what we are looking for-what Sophocles must surely have looked for-some sin, some fault in Oedipus's character which would justify to me the seemingly cruel and immporal ways of Zeus or of Apollo or of Fate." (Vellacott) Only as the play unfolds is the audience allowed to displace there perception to that of Oedipus's gods. Plans are in motion. Plans within plans. Plots within plots. We begin to see over, and past, the precipice of Oedipus's understanding. We the audience, like a shared collective of gods, begin to see the decisions made by Oedipus for what they…

    • 1456 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first glance, Plato’s The Republic seems a tedious exercise in trying to follow one man’s irrational effort to construct a city when he was tasked simply with explaining a single word. However, the republic created by Socrates throughout the duration of the dialogue and the points that come from it are not as unnecessary or superfluous as they initially seem. The Republic is clearly a specifically worded dialogue about philosophy, but not necessarily only for philosophers. The seemingly excessive examples throughout the text are in fact a blueprint allowing for the general public to understand and assume Plato’s logic, ultimately bringing them not just to Socrates’ conclusion about justice as a…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Callicles

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages

    ‘War and Battle’ are the opening words of the Gorgias. Voegelin believes this to be a battle for the soul of the younger generation. ‘Who will form the future leaders of the polity: the rhetor who teaches the tricks of political success, or the philosopher who creates the substance in soul and society?’1 Although the dialogue opens with a discussion on the art of oratory the true concern of the Gorgias is with ethics. Plato saw this new-fangled art as a breeding ground for all that was corrupt and false in life.2 Therefore as Taylor describes it ‘the true object of this work…is to pit a typical life of devotion to the supra-personal good against the typical theory and practice of the “will to power”’.3 The Gorgias is split into 3 phases each with its main character (as counterpart to Socrates). With each phase the arguments become increasingly vehement in tone as the issues at stake become more fundamental. The dialogue culminates in a defence by Socrates of his philosophic way of life as a response to Callicles request to abandon it and turn to politics. The contest between philosophy and politics is approached through a series of themes: justice, moderation and hedonism4 and it is the 3rd and longer part of the work that I will focus on, the dialogue with Callicles.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates vs Protagoras

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Plato goes a long way in attempting to distinguish Socrates from the likes of Protagoras, a self admitted sophist. In Protagoras, Socrates is depicted as a street smart, wisdom dispensing young man, brash with confidence and a bit of arrogance that goes a long way when confronted with the old school rhetoric of Protagoras. Plato begins to separate the two at the hip right from the get go. The dialogue between Socrates and his inquisitive friend Hippocrates went a long way to show that Socrates had more questions than answers about Protagoras, the sophist, especially when it came to talk about what it is exactly that he offers. Socrates' companion is eager to hear the words of Protagoras and become one of his pupils, for he thinks that there is much to be learned from him and he is willing to sacrifice all that he has to do so. Socrates starts to ask him what it is exactly that he thinks Protagoras offers, his friend is unsure, and the two begin a lengthy dialogue trying to distinguish a sophist from any other person of ability and wisdom.…

    • 1711 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Questions on Socrates

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages

    2. Is Socrates against nature, or following it? Please draw examples from Aristophanes’ The Clouds and the relevant Platonic Dialogues.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Socrates

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Within the Republic, Plato comprehends some of his most developed philosophical views through the extended exploration concerning the fundamental principles in conducting a human life. By his employment of Socrates as his spokesperson, the reader learns of a society in which a merited aristocracy would rule, thus resulting in a civilization where all citizens are equal and no one is looked on as an alien. Instead, each citizen would simply fulfill their dictate of civil justice with the resulted effect being an emphasized state of activity rather than achievement. To begin the transition, Socrates describes the necessary removal of stories within Greek Methodology, as he did not feel they provided the proper foundation in influencing young…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    What is Philosophy

    • 774 Words
    • 2 Pages

    According to the famous Greek philosopher Socrates, “The unexamined life is not worth living”. But what does he mean by this? He means that we should look and think through life deeper. Examination of life is more than just a use of common sense. Hard thinking is necessary even though it disturbs. With the use of Philosophy, we better understand things and answer the most important questions in existence. Philosophy, according to the famous Greek philosopher Aristotle, begins with wonder at the marvels and mysteries of the world. In other words, we started to question things around us because of our curiosity and our need to attain knowledge about things. Philosophy is the love of wisdom (etymologically from the Greek word philos, meaning “love”, and sophia, meaning “wisdom”). It means that we must have the initiative to pursue knowledge because we love to have it. Seeking the truth doesn’t always mean triumph, success or satisfaction. Sometimes, giving up our received tradition and disturbing our common sense requires our intellectual and emotional strength for us to be able to grasp new ideas that would later on benefit us and free us from wrong notions, beliefs and ideas. We must not give up in philosophical inquiry and reserve ourselves for the pursuit of truth because truth will set us free from the darkness of ignorance. Philosophy is not always constant. We must learn to develop the sense of perceiving others’ viewpoints. Philosophy points out our every false perception in terms of what we believed in. But people react to philosophical inquiry in different ways — positively or negatively. In this way, Philosophy teaches us to argue. One of Philosophy’s tasks is to clarify concepts. We should learn to dispute over the different concepts by looking at the frame of reference of the phrase, note its inherent ambiguity, and to unravel it making things clearer. In short, understanding is a major factor in order to clarify concepts.…

    • 774 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays