Preview

Examples Of Anti Natalism

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1023 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Anti Natalism
The person who crashed did not choose or even have any relation to the choice to draw at a total of 18, so the winnings as a result of that action are not their own. The chain of causality of the first person on the second ends before reaching the casino, so they could not cause the actions of the second person. Similarly, the parent allows the causality of the child to play out by bringing it into existence, but they have no relation to the creation of value..
Eternal and External Value In the base argument, the claims that existence is not eternal and value is not external are used. However, these claims are not fundamental to an argument for anti-natalism, but only work to create an imperative instead of a cautionary statement. Succinctly, if existence is eternal then value will eventually
…show more content…
However, it now becomes relevant to not simply distinguish, but refine our definitions. Originally, preference was only defined by whether something results in pleasure or pain and ability was the option to have preference. But, with this definition, the conclusions reached with our definition would be applicable to more than just humans. Furthermore, pleasure and pain are grounded in the advancement of the self and the species. For example, there is absolutely no living being who does desire to maintain itself in some fashion, excluding special cases. Although it is certainly a preference, by the original definition, it fails to illuminate anything meaningful and makes the definition of ability somewhat mute. When preference includes the foundations of living, preference disintegrates into the definition of life. To remove this equivocation, preference must be defined distinct from “impulse”: impulse, a desire devoid of value or meaning beyond that of animal relation; and preference, a desire grounded in value or meaning beyond those assigned at birth, a humanist end.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    “there is no such thing as a baby……if you set out to describe a baby, you will find you are describing a baby and someone. A baby cannot exist alone, but is essentially part of a relationship”.…

    • 1586 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    is not the production of pleasing objects; and above all, it is not pleasure; but it is a means…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use, but as she points out, isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling on the fact that the fetus is a person and hardly any time explaining how the fetus being a person has anything to with abortion being impermissible. In the same breath, she states that those who agree with abortion spend a lot of their time saying the fetus is in fact not a person. Either way, no argument is really formed. No reasons are given. For sake of challenging an actual argument, she is disregarding this issue. With this premise out of the way, she addresses the basic argument the pro-choice campaign believes. “Every person has a right to life. So the fetus has a right to life. No doubt the mother has a right to decide what shall happen in and to her body; everyone would grant that. But surely a person’s right to life is stronger and more stringent than the mother’s right to decide what happens in and to her body, and so outweighs it. So the fetus may not be killed; an abortion may not be performed.” The remainder of her paper is a series of analogies meant to challenge the basic argument mention above. When looking at the analogies separately, they are in no way related to the abortion topic, but the conclusions drawn from each can be applied. Because these examples aren’t directly related to the debate, our emotions won’t necessarily be involved and we can clearly think about what is the “right” thing to do for each specific scenario.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For J.S. Mill, decreasing pain and increasing pleasure is good. However, not all pleasure is the same. Mill argues that intellectual pleasures are superior to bodily pleasures (Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapter 2).…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miranda Right

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages

    - Rule - that determines the goodness of an action by measuring the utility of that action when it is made into a rule for behavior.…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Crabtree, Claire. "The Confluence of Folklore, Feminism and Black Self-Determination in Zora Neale Hurston's 'Their Eyes Were Watching God'." The Southern Literary Journal 17.2 (Spring 1985): 54-66. Rpt. in Contemporary Literary Criticism. Ed. Roger Matuz and Cathy Falk. Vol. 61.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    III. In regards to the substantive issue, Regan “equality of interests” principle entitles that animals, because they can experience pleasure and pain are more like humans than rocks, entitling them equal treatment—with respect to utilitarianism.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Marquis stated in his writing “Clearly, it is wrong to kill adult human beings. Clearly, it is not wrong to end the life of some arbitrarily chosen single human cell. Fetuses seem to be like arbitrarily chosen human cells in some respects and like adult humans in other respects.” (Wolff pg. 361). Marquis thus suggest that a proper contention for an anti-abortionist (Value of the future account) must be founded on the theory that if someone is not afforded the ‘opportunity’ to experience certain gains or projects due to the negligence/actions of others then whomever is responsible for the loss of that person’s life is in fact morally…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Don Marquis Theory

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Marquis argues that most abortions are immoral because they deprive the fetus of a future like ours. This future-like-ours is a future of value; hence, to deny such a future is wrong. Future of a fetus includes experiences, projects, activities, enjoyments which are identical with futures of adults and children.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    trolley problem

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I believe the theory which makes most sense is Jeremy Bentham’s theory of the hedonic calculus. However due to many decisions and actions having to be made in a matter of seconds, I can’t see it being practical in everyday life. The process of the hedonic calculus can take a matter of hours let alone minuets, and by following the process step-by step the decision that had to be made may have already passed. In relation to John mills theory of maximum pleasure and minimal pain, I strongly disagree that this is the correct answer for many ethical situations. Everyone’s pleasures are different and individual, for you to make a decision this can become a hindrance as it’s hard to define how to receive the maximum happiness from every individual. Using this theory in just a situation when it’s just your happiness involved however is a simple process, as you will know your preferences and what makes you happy. However when using this theory in a situation with more than one person it becomes a very complicated situation.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Marquis On Abortion

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For instance the difference between an unconscious patient and a comatose patient. It may be argued if fetuses have the ability to take an interest in their interests, but at best, they do have the future ability to take an interest in their interests. Marquis argues you cannot have a right to life unless it expressly desires its own continued existence; as fetuses do not value in such a way. He argues that just because a being does not currently value or desire something, it does not follow that that thing is not valuable to, or desirable for,…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abortion in the 1930s.

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The economic situation during the 1930s drove some potential mothers to undergo illegal abortions. Opinions on this issue differed, as illustrated by these three documents.…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The television industry is radically changing with the appearance of a new type of television service, the internet television.…

    • 2983 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suspense Short Story

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do you like suspense stories? If so, “Sorry Wrong Number” by Lucille Fletcher and “Sorry Right Number” by Stephen King are two very good suspense stories. The plot of both of the stories are centered around phone calls.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays