Preview

Examples Of Bias In American History

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
611 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Bias In American History
Throughout history there are many different perspectives, but what they all have in common is that the man narrating wishes to gain from his perspective and he will manipulate his words to form bias.

There are three forms of Bias in American History, first and most easily identifiable is propaganda. An occurrence of propaganda is the two tellings of the battle of sand creek. Chivington states that the casualties for women and children were very low. He went so far as to say that the greater number of children and wives escaped. In this account, all-in­-all a battle with few signs of a massacre, causing the reader to see general chivington as the leader of an honorable battle. Chief Black kettle’s account of the same battle was very contradictive. He mentions how a girl age of six was shot while she was carrying a white flag to signal surrender and peace. He also states that many children had died in their mothers arms. The difference is astounding, and the truth can not be something in the middle but rather one or the other. General Chivington used propaganda to make his massacre seem as honorable as possible, and to glorify
…show more content…

From what we know Jefferson was anti slavery, but he never really fought for it. However that is not all of it, Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner. He had a slave woman with whom he bore children with. He also was in-debt at one point of his life, and he used slaves to increase his income. Thomas Jefferson never openly admitted that he had slaves, but he openly stated that he was against slavery. This benefits him as the full personality of Thomas Jefferson can only be found by digging deeper, rather than him being the perfect founding forefather that we thought. Many people believe that Thomas Jefferson was a truly great man, and while he did do good, the people of today are not fully aware of the bad that Thomas Jefferson was part

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I John Adams is here today to address the jury of the innocence of the men that were involved in the killing of 5 civilians. On March 5, 1770 a riot broke out on the streets of Boston causing mayhem; British soldiers arrived on the scene to find the civilians out of control, and in order to gain order knowing the risk that was being taken they put their lives in danger to get a furious mob under control. No one man deserves to have his life taking and neither does he deserves to have it threatened and that is exactly what these men were experiecneing as they stood befor a raging crowd of civilians as they tore threw the streets of Boston. To have you're life threatened is just as bad as having it taken away from you ; Iam not saying that what they did was right but Iam saying that they were given no other choice considering the circumstances they were put under it was either kill or be killed and if they had not made the decision to take out the threat it would be civilians here today instead of these soldiers, If you were put in their shoes would you have not made the same choice? or is it just these soldiers who find that their life is valuable enought to protect? They were harassed, objects were thrown at them and they were threatened. Please allow these men to have a fair trial and please do not pass judgement upon them for they felt that they were doing something in defence of them selves as for every one of the world wants to be protected and when ever they feel threaten they will react the same way these men…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Aastha Bhandari Prof Galloway Hist 1301 19 Set 2017 1. You are a British Soldier that was assigned to protect the Customs House in Boston. An event the colonials call the “Boston Massacre” took place. You have been called back to London and must defend your innocence in the matter.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Howard’s book, In Passionate Declarations: essay on war and justice, the chapter “The Use and Abuse of History” Howard clarifies that history gravitates towards partial explanations of encounters. Howard explains that it is crucial to analyze both known and hidden facts about historical accounts because it only demonstrates a microscopic fragment of an event. Because of the bias of an author, details are often omitted. Howard recounts an experience during his college years; he heard a song called “The Ludlow Massacre”. Ludlow massacre reveals the massacre of woman and children who were burned to death for striking against a Rockefeller owned coal mines in Colorado, 1914. Howard never encountered the Ludlow Massacre in any of his American…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, the soldiers were told not to fire any weapons, yet they did. Since the citizens were not armed, the soldiers were clearly at a much greater advantage. If the soldiers had refrained from this action then the “massacre” would’ve been fairer. Although the shot was just a shot in the crowd, it still started a huge commotion killing 5 innocent citizens. If the soldiers saw the rioters coming to them, they should have immediately put away their fire arms and set a fair ground so that they could settle this practically.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson, the great president and the writer of the Declaration of Independence. Jefferson did not expect the Declaration of Independence to end slavery, his slavery clause indicates his distaste for the growth of the institution of slavery and yet his actions are inconsistent related to slavery. He tried to make the slave trade abolished, yet he owned slaves, it has been said he had a sexual relationship with one of his slaves, and he used them for his plantations. Why did he go through the trouble to even stop slaves when he owned so many?…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the story "John Adams and the Coming of the Revolution”, author David McCullough discusses how John Adams was asked to defend the British soldiers in court of the soldier’s accusation of man slaughter, following the Boston Massacre. Being such a problematic case that could ruin his reputation, John Adams accepted to defend the soldiers because of his experience in difficult cases, and his strong principles and beliefs. John Adam’s reputation did not even tarnish because of how skillfully he handled the case gaining the respect of the people of Boston.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    | Despite the fact that most eyewitnesses’ testimonies denounced Captain Thomas Pretson ordering his men to fire upon the citizens, he believed these people were biased and words aren’t 100% reliable.…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jefferson is one of the few historical Americans who need no introduction; it is true that without him the United States would…

    • 221 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 29th regiment was known for its inexperienced and volatile soldiers. Governor Hutchinson himself even deemed the soldiers of the 29th as "such bad fellows that it seems impossible to restrain them from firing upon an insult or provocation." With this in mind, it seems all too clear that the soldiers of the 29th regiment would commit such a treachery as firing upon innocent civilians; even though there may have been no or little provocation. Although the soldiers dealing with the crowd on King Street certainly had a right to fear their angry adversaries, they had no justifiable reason to fire into the crowd, since no soldier was hurt by the people in the crowd. Basically speaking, the soldiers should've been disciplined enough to "hold fast" until the mob calmed down.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The use of slavery to paradoxically define American freedom is first shown by the use of Jefferson, the “slaveholding spokesman of freedom”(Morgan). His attitude toward slavery can be shown in two ways. The first of which is debt. Debt is a force that can hold down any free man and this was why Jefferson hated debt so much. As a planter, he was basically forced into debt and resisted giving up his slaves until he found his freedom from that debt. He did not care about the freedom of his slavery as he did for his own. Jefferson also stated that a nation would be very fertile for tyranny if the men of a nation did not have enough land or money to support their families. This is paradoxical because the slaves live in a world of tyranny where the master is there monarch and the slave has no land or money to support their families. His second dislike was artisans. He stated that they lived dependent lives because they were dependent on the customer and had no other business or land to fall back on. Jefferson, on the other hand, liked farmers because they were very independent and always had a source of income. Jefferson states “the man who depended on another for his loving could never be truly free” (Morgan). This shows that Jefferson is willing to fight for the artisans who are dependent but does not want to forgo his slaves. Although freedom was rising for those who were dependent on others, the same dependent slaves had no improvements in liberty.…

    • 670 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a result, the Confederates who were struck by surprise from this raid, retreated to the nearby village of Green Pond. The Confederates were caught so off-guard because of endemic diseases spreading during the time. If the Confederate troops were not suffering from illness it’s questionable if the Union would have run into more detrimental obstacles. Once the Union troops were deployed, they laid waste to houses, plantations, and other Confederate accommodations. The fact that the Union was so relentless in burning peoples homes and livelihoods makes one question the sides of the Civil War. When learning about the Civil War in school, most kids are taught that the North was the good side and the South was the bad side. However, after reading this article, it is understood that both sides possessed both good and bad…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson had many accomplishments but he is a hypocrite. Thomas Jefferson disagreed with the whole slavery ordeal yet he owned slaves. He didn’t make an effort to change people’s views on owning slaves. Thomas Jefferson had children with a slave by the name Sally Hemmings. She was seven – eighths white and one – eighth black. She had 6 children with Thomas Jefferson. He kept his children and treated them as slaves. He owned around 300 slaves at one point. He set his children and skilled workers as runaways so they can be free in the north. Thomas Jefferson set rewards for the captures of the runaway slaves. This symbolizes that although he freed the slaves they still weren’t totally free. He is a hypocrite for not believing in the ownage of slavery yet he beared slave children.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson was a man who was against slavery and believed in freedom. His thoughts of slavery was it was a destruction to America . Jefferson also saw slavery as an abolishment of the right to personal liberty. During the time of the American Revolution, Thomas Jefferson was very involved in the legislation in hopes it would result in the abolition of slavery. As Jefferson began to abolition slavery, the population of slaves began to rise. Instead slavery became more widespread and profitable.…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770 shots fired out through the city, leaving five dead, more wounded, and soldiers that were charged of murder. This was called the Boston Massacre a huge turning point in the colonies. Although most people thought the soldiers were guilty I think they aren’t. I will prove from the testimony and eyewitness accounts that the soldiers should not be charged with murder and they acted only in self-defense.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boston Massacre

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I think that William Wyatt is a bloody liar. His story conflict with just about every other witness that was presented. I think he was brought forth by the prosecution to condemn Captain Preston. Theodore Bliss offered one of the most helpful testimonies in the whole case. He was a witness for the prosecution but he cooraborated Captain Preston's deposition. He testified to the rowdiness of the crowd and the fact that the guards were provoked and said he never heard an order to fire.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays