Preview

Guilty: The Boston Massacre

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
483 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Guilty: The Boston Massacre
On March 5, 1770 shots fired out through the city, leaving five dead, more wounded, and soldiers that were charged of murder. This was called the Boston Massacre a huge turning point in the colonies. Although most people thought the soldiers were guilty I think they aren’t. I will prove from the testimony and eyewitness accounts that the soldiers should not be charged with murder and they acted only in self-defense.
Although soldiers fired into the crowd I think they are still not guilty and acted in self- defense according to what Daniel Cornwall said, “I think I should of heard him. I directly heard a voice say “Damn you, why do you fire? Don’t fire.” I thought it was the Captain’s then. I now believe it.” Cornwall was standing about two yards away from Captain Preston when the guns went off. According to John Adams HBO Mini Series,Captain Preston, he said that he was standing in front of his soldiers, but when one soldier got hit in the head with a club that was made for beating rope, now the weapon. Getting hit by the club made the soldiers gun discharge leading more to fire. Soldiers thought they heard “Fire.” coming from Preston. Preston knew he didn’t say the words and immediately said, “Don’t fire!” Five people died and more were wounded. Richard Palmes was also near Preston when the guns fired, so close that his
…show more content…
People had been throwing snowballs and clubs that soon turned the crowd into a mob. After one club hit a soldier on the head, causing him to fall down his gun discharged. The other soldiers fired after him and leaving five dead and more wound. Preston told them specifically not to fire, but the soldiers had to act in self-defense. People think that all of the accounts stating that Preston told them not to fire are a lie but I believe not. The soldiers and Captain that fired on March 5th, 1770 are in fact not guilty for committing five

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Also, another reason is that John parker from another excerpt said they had eight men killed by the regular troops. If the Militia soldiers had fired wouldn't you think they would have killed a few british men if the militiamen fired first? John Parker said to his men,”concluded not to be discovered, nor meddle or make with said Regular Troops (if they should approach) unless they should insult or molest us; and, upon their sudden Approach, I immediately ordered our Militia to disperse, and not to fire.”…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Colonel Campbell’s men were the first to charge up the hill and engage the Rangers (Alderman 36). The mountain was rough, but still they took charge. Campbell’s shouted appeal was, “Boys remember your liberty, come on, do it my brave fellows, another gun, another gun will do it.” When Shelby’s men approached the bottom of the hill, he yelled, “Now boys, quickly reload your rifles and let’s advance upon them and give them another hell of a fire.” More and more troops continued to take down the British. “The human slaughter was tremendous. The dead and wounded covered the mountain on the slopes and on the flat” (Alderman 38). Ferguson soon realized that he had pretty much lost, but he did not surrender yet. He broke his way through enemy lines; slashing his sword at whoever was in his way. Ferguson and two fellow officers were shot down by the creek. “Most historians have credited Robert Young with the deed. Regardless, the bullet that felled Ferguson soon brought the battle to an end” (Alderman 38). Captain Abraham De Peyster took charge of the British force after Ferguson died. Captain De Peyster continued to fight on, but he hopelessly realized there was not much more he and his troops could do, so he surrendered. A near tragedy occurred soon after the British surrendered. Tories, followers of King George III, grabbed their guns and fired at the patriots. The aftermath was very confusing…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To begin with, there are two witnesses to the Battle at Lexington and Concord that openly admit to the British being the ones to first open fire. John Parker, the commander of the militia in Lexington, accounts that upon hearing that the British troops were approaching he gave orders to his men to “disperse and not to fire”. He then also recalls that his men were rushed by the British troops who opened fire and killed eight of their party without receiving any provoking from the militia in Lexington.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was a mob of about a hundred people outside of the Custom House, where the king’s money is stored. Preston took all measures to make sure that the riot was cleared up as quickly and peacefully as possible. “So far was I from intending the death of any person that I suffered the troops to go to the spot where the unhappy affair took place without any loading in their pieces; not did I ever give orders for loading them.” In this statement Preston’s intentions are not to harm anyone, but rather to take the high road. The mod kept on increasing in numbers and calling out, “Come on you rascals, you bloody backs, you lobster scoundrels, fire if you dare, G-d damn you, fire and be damned, we know you dare not.” This goes to show that the colonist are very angry and are looking to start a fight…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, British soldiers were badgered to the point of outrage by a small group of boys (Wheeler and Becker, 75). The soldiers eventually retaliated at the group and the church bells started ringing alarming the town that a fire had broken out only leading the numbers in the crowd to increase (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Captain Thomas Preston and his sentry were called to the scene to assist. However, their attempts to redirect the crowd were unsuccessful. It is at this point that a musket was fired and the situation continued to escalate leaving some dead and others wounded (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Was Captain Thomas Preston guilty of murder by ordering his soldiers to fire? Or was he innocent and the soldiers fired out of provocation and their own volition?…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Specific Support : John Parker, the chief of the militia in Lexington, states that he oredered, once he heard the British troops were approaching, “our Militia to disperse, and not to fire”…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Carr Influence

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows. With Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie(Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony abiut the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    By studying both the Boston Massacre and the Kent State Massacre, I have decided that through my research that the Kent State Massacre was the only real massacre between these two events. The citizens in both the Boston Massacre and the Kent State Massacre were not armed. The soldiers in both, the Boston Massacre and The Kent State Massacre were not acting in self defense. Both of these incidents could have been avoided.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, a group of brave colonists gathered around a British Soldier at a local tax office. They hurled insults at the soldier, and with the confusion that ranged gunshots were heard; Five men were found wounded on the ground. Although the Boston Massacre seemed to be the colonists' fault since they started off by hurling insults, we must remember how the British Soldiers treated the colonists before. For example, the Quartering Act forced families to have open their homes to British Soldiers in order to shelter and feed them. Nevertheless, the news about the Boston Massacre spread quickly throughout the colonies.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists were throwing snowballs, sticks, and even stones at the soldiers. Furious the soldiers fired into the group of people, at that piont 3 people were killed and 8 people were badly injured. So, Captain Thomas Preston was taken on a trail there, John Adams and Josiah Quincey defend Captain Preston…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre was a crucial event that occurred on March 5th, 1770. At this point in history, tension was high between the British forces and angry colonists. People of the 13 colonies began to become outraged at Britain for passing unfair laws, such as taxes on goods like tea and paper. A group of men whom had lost their jobs and blamed the British gathered around the Customs House in a riot. Eight British soldiers stood their ground in front of the protesters, both sides becoming more and more outraged at each other. The event quickly escalated after young Edward Garrick is hit with the back of a soldier’s firearm. Private Hugh Montgomery is hit with a club and is the first to fire at the colonists, despite Captain Thomas Preston’s command not to shoot. More men are killed as people began to back away from the scene. The Boston Massacre ends with 5 patriots dead and 6 wounded. As the Independence Hall Association says, “The Boston Massacre was a signal event leading to the Revolutionary War.” The colonists were fed up with Britain and acted on their anger without thinking about what could’ve and did happen. The soldiers ignored their orders not to shoot and turned a riot into a massacre that led to the Revolutionary War. Had both sides controlled their rage and not acted without considering the consequences, the death of 5 people would have been…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lexington Concord

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What does Parker say the British troops did when they approached his militia?Troops made their appearance and rushed furiously, fired upon, and killed eight of our Party without receiving any Provocation therefor from us.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although John Adams defended the British redcoats at the end of 1770, the Boston Massacre actually happened March 5, 1770. Furthermore, events that led to the culmination of that night dated back to 1767 (Timeline). Many factors went into the decision, by John Adams, to defend the British soldiers. The atmosphere of the times dictated much of that evening and of that trial. For the time it was a radical thing for a man such as John Adams to defend the British troops, however his respect of the law led to his defense of the British troops. John Adams was right in defending the redcoat in the Boston Massacre trial because he saw the actions of the redcoats as nothing more than men defending their lives.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ap Boston Massacre Trials

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages

    After this whole case, and a lot of thought, I find each of the eight British soldiers guilty of voluntary manslaughter. They were not found guilty of murder because they were provoked, but not to the point where they killed anybody under self-defense, which would deem them as not guilty. They are found guilty for manslaughter because they were being threatened, but not to the point where their lives were in any danger. In the trial, John Adams specifically stated " Adams conceded, however, that if the assault "was not so severe as to endanger their lives ,this was a provocation, for which the law reduces the offense of killing down to manslaughter." This supports my verdict as voluntary manslaughter, they should be punished according to the punishment.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American Revolutionary War officially started in 1775 however the most important parts of the revolution started before 1775. The sugar act of 1764 was issued by the English parliament and the act taxed goods such as sugar and molasses. There were many protests over the sugar act because the act only taxed the colonies; this tax did not apply for Europeans. The sugar act was the birth of revolutionary thoughts among the thirteen colonies. After the first act came many more acts.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays