Preview

Ap Boston Massacre Trials

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
251 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap Boston Massacre Trials
NO NAME
APUSH, Hyland, 6th Period
9-26-2012
Trial Verdicts After quite some time of thought, I find the first man, Capt. Preston, to be not guilty of murder at any degree. He did not actually murder anyone because he did not have a gun during the Boston massacre, making it impossible for Preston to actually kill another man. There was also no disputable evidence that Capt. Preston ordered his men to shoot. After all, the eight men were provoked to shoot without command to do so. After this whole case, and a lot of thought, I find each of the eight British soldiers guilty of voluntary manslaughter. They were not found guilty of murder because they were provoked, but not to the point where they killed anybody under self-defense, which would deem them as not guilty. They are found guilty for manslaughter because they were being threatened, but not to the point where their lives were in any danger. In the trial, John Adams specifically stated " Adams conceded, however, that if the assault "was not so severe as to endanger their lives ,this was a provocation, for which the law reduces the offense of killing down to manslaughter." This supports my verdict as voluntary manslaughter, they should be punished according to the punishment. In closing I will restate my verdict in a more summarized fashion. I find Capt. Preston not guilty of murder under any degree. I find the eight red coat soldiers guilty of voluntary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The same date of the Boston Massacre the officials living with the colonists. Most of the tax was opted out which was on the Tea. Tea was very important drink in the colonists (aside rum and beer which was safe to drink ). The tax on tea was not that high, the new Tea Act of 1773 but it actually lowered…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Crispus Attucks was an African-American man killed during the Boston Massacre and thus believed to be the first casualty of the American Revolution.…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the American Revolution Soldiers weren’t the only ones who were at high risk of death. For example in the small town of Redding, Connecticut there was a variety of different opinions on war. Unlike like most happy stories and fairytales there was no good side, there might have been a good cause but no side was considered innocent. The Patriots were killing someone for a crime they did or looked like they were committing even if they were fighting for their side. The British were exaggerating situations to get a chance to execute a fellow loyalist or Patriot. In the book My Brother Sam is Dead by, James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier,…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams was the only lawyer in Boston to take on the defense case of the British troops for the Boston Massacre. Adams agrees to take on the case, despite its unpopularity, because he believes that all men were entitled to a fair trial and deserved equal justice. He also has a position in Boston’s legislature as motivation, which is not shown in the film. We don’t get to see the rest of the defense team in the docudrama either; Josiah Quincy is left out. All accused men receive their own individual trial. All but two soldiers are acquitted; Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy are charged with manslaughter. Adams wins the case for his client and is elected to a higher position in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    As for every story, there are two sides to this important timepiece. There are many sources of information for this subject. Many provided for me were affidavits, or accounts, of key people in the conflict. Some are more credible than others. As for the affidavit of John Parker, it seems believable. On the other hand, it lacks detail. His account is very short and simple. Not many details are present compared to others. In this legal document, he states he ordered them to disperse and to not fire upon the enemy (British Troops). According to him, the British troops approached and rushed with fury and fired without any previous provocations. In my opinion, this may seem like a good source, but when compared to others it is not the greatest.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It is often said to remember important mistakes, crimes, declines, anything negative so that, "History does not repeat itself." Some of the notable mistakes include strategic errors in wars; such as the French, in World War I, stacking the Maginot Line while the Germans marched around it, and in World War II doing the exact same thing. Other mistakes include incidents on domestic soil in which protests turn violent such as the Boston Massacre in 1770 and the Kent State Shootings in 1970. Other than each happening on Mondays and occurring almost two hundred years apart, the two draw deeper comparisons to one another which caused widespread protest leaving marks in American history. Upon reviewing these two cases it triggers the question, did history repeat itself?…

    • 3432 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq Boston Massacre

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page

    On March 5, 1770 an angry mob started hurling rocks, ice, and insults at Redcoats. The British were ordered not to fire by Captain Thomas Preston, but as the Patriots pressed forward, a redcoat was knocked down to the ground. They panicked, and opened fire on the crowd. Crispus Attucks was a black man standing at the front, and he died immediately after being shot. In the end, 5 bostonians were dead and 10 were injured.…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, British soldiers were badgered to the point of outrage by a small group of boys (Wheeler and Becker, 75). The soldiers eventually retaliated at the group and the church bells started ringing alarming the town that a fire had broken out only leading the numbers in the crowd to increase (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Captain Thomas Preston and his sentry were called to the scene to assist. However, their attempts to redirect the crowd were unsuccessful. It is at this point that a musket was fired and the situation continued to escalate leaving some dead and others wounded (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Was Captain Thomas Preston guilty of murder by ordering his soldiers to fire? Or was he innocent and the soldiers fired out of provocation and their own volition?…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The documents supporting that the British had taken the first shot had lacked in validity compared to the articles that stated the Colonists took the first shot. Both document C and document G are secondary sources, so they are biased by people that were not at the battle. In document C, he was writing a novel from a child’s point of view where the child’s father died; this means that the child in the novel most likely just wanted to blame it on the person who killed his father rather than say who actually took the first shot; most likely he was more focused on his dad rather than his surroundings and was naïve to the fact that the Colonists took the first shot. In document G, the textbook does not state where the information was pulled out that told them that the British fired first, so there is no solid evidence. In document B, 34 minutemen did say that the British took the first shot, but that is not because they think or know that for sure, but because going against themselves was betrayal to them, so they did not want to betray their own people; betrayal is wrong to everyone. In document D, supporting that the Colonists took the first, was much more valid because he was on the front line and had less bias. He was also much more specific then the other articles, showing how much he really knew what was going on.…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The very next day we were told to leave the Boston by the Gov.Hutchinson .All the people of the Boston came on the street to insult and curse us .On march 13, the colony attorney general issued 13 indictments for murder. We were accused that the murder was all planned and all of us had revenge in hearts. In March 6 a warrant was issued for the arrest of Captain Thomas Preston and the officer in charge of the troops who did the shooting .Me and other seven soldiers under Preston’s command were clapped into prison later the same day. In a particular witness testified that one or two weeks before shooting , Pvt Killroy had said that “ he would never miss an opportunity ,if he had one to fire on the Boston people .…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, later said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows, with Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie (Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony about the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Carr Influence

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows. With Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie(Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony abiut the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The event became known as the Boston Massacre. After this event, the soldiers involved were put on trial, resulting in the mild punishment of only one of…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Adams backed and protected the soldiers who were involved in the 1770 Boston Massacre. This act of justice reflected Adams’ fierce integrity. His part in this political drama only increased his public standing and in the long run made him more respected than ever. This act of firm belief established the fairness and principle in Adams’ mind that “no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial...” (66). This mindset from the beginning had transfered and this basis later became the roots for American independence. Adams had taken on many trials, often taking the risky side, but had always stood behind his firm beliefs. Adams always wanted to ensure that the innocent were protected and even though he disagreed with British policies, he wanted to ensure the British soldiers got a fair trial. Moreover, this act of courage only solidified his honesty and loyalty. It proved to the public that he would stand up for what he believed in. That message would later become confirmed and the outlook of these cases created what would be the flashpoint in Adams’…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The soldiers fired at the the crowd. Then the colonists were up and arms about the Boston Massacre so the King and Parliament were forced to have the soldiers tried in court at the colonies and The King had John Adams be the lawyer for the soldiers and John Adams accepted because he thought everyone deserves the right to a lawyer. “Quickly becoming known as the Boston Massacre, the episode further propelled the colonies toward war with the British. Flames were fanned even more when the eight soldiers involved in the incident and their captain Thomas Preston were acquitted on the grounds of…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays