Preview

Patrick Carr Influence

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
615 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patrick Carr Influence
Patrick Carr was not a politician, or a general, or anything of much influence. He was a common working man. Although he became important to the American Revolution post-death. More importantly, where, when, and by whom he was killed. Also what he said in the few days before he passed on.
Patrick Carr was born between 1739 and 1740. He was an Irish journeyman and apprentice to “Mr. Field, a ‘leather-breeches-maker’” ‘material made by tanning animal skin - short pants that end at the knee - maker’ (Boston 1775). Carr grew up in Ireland and was familiar with soldiers and street mobs. So on March 5th, 1770, (date of the Boston Massacre) Carr probably knew that the British were the insinuators of the disturbance. While traversing the street, the soldiers fired and
…show more content…
His doctor, Doctor Jefferies, said that Carr did not blame the soldier who shot him. Carr was surprised that they did not shoot sooner. His ‘deathbed testimony’ was presented to court by Dr. Jefferies as follows. With Jeffries repeating what Carr said to him. “Prosecutor- Were the soldiers greatly abused? Jefferies- Yes, they were. Prosecutor- Would they have been hurt if they had not fired? Jefferies- Yes. Prosecutor- So they fired in self-defense? Jefferies- Yes, and he did not blame whoever it was that hit him.” This testimony was believed due to the fact that the jury did not think a dying man or his doctor would lie(Boston). This short excerpt from a newspaper article about the Boston massacre supports Carr’s testimony abiut the soldiers being harassed, “The noise brought people together; and John Hicks, a young lad, coming up, knocked the soldier down but let him get up again; and more lads gathering, drove them back to the barrack where the boys stood some time as it were to keep them in (Boston Massacre Historical).” Carr’s words let the soldier that shot him go free and spread unrest among the colonists. Samuel Adams took

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrick Henry was a lawyer and politician between (1736-1799). Patrick Henry was a leading figure of the american revolutionary period. Patrick was a opponent of the stamp and townshend acts levied by England. Patrick was best know for the saying Give me liberty or give me death speech to the Virginia assembly in 1775. Patrick had a role in the overthrow of the royally appointed Virginia and was elected governor. Patrick criticisms helped bring about the amendments that became the bill of rights. Patrick was a failure as a p;anter and storekeeper but then had a success as a lawyer and politician. Patrick opposed the tariffs imposed by the townshend acts and the british attempt to collect them by using the Royal Navy and naval courts martial.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    McCullough strategically and chronologically delineates each battle of the Revolution beginning with the Battle of Bunker Hill. Throughout each of the battles, McCullough thoroughly explains the colonial struggles and accomplishments as he also displays the British as a nasty group of individuals who were hard-hearted with loyalty to the Crown. However, most of the Loyalists simply feared the British royalty as punishment for treason was overbearingly harsh. Although biased, McCullough carefully displays the American Revolution as brutal for both the British and the colonists. He writes of “the most crucial year” from a cardinal view, concentrating emphasis on American strategy rather than British strategy. He acknowledges the British’s major distress, yet he undermines the importance of the drudgery of the Loyalists, disregarding the punishments that they were forced to endure by the colonists. Some of these castigations include the practice of tarring and feathering and merciless murder.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    John Adams was the only lawyer in Boston to take on the defense case of the British troops for the Boston Massacre. Adams agrees to take on the case, despite its unpopularity, because he believes that all men were entitled to a fair trial and deserved equal justice. He also has a position in Boston’s legislature as motivation, which is not shown in the film. We don’t get to see the rest of the defense team in the docudrama either; Josiah Quincy is left out. All accused men receive their own individual trial. All but two soldiers are acquitted; Hugh Montgomery and Matthew Kilroy are charged with manslaughter. Adams wins the case for his client and is elected to a higher position in the Massachusetts House of Representatives.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, British soldiers were badgered to the point of outrage by a small group of boys (Wheeler and Becker, 75). The soldiers eventually retaliated at the group and the church bells started ringing alarming the town that a fire had broken out only leading the numbers in the crowd to increase (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Captain Thomas Preston and his sentry were called to the scene to assist. However, their attempts to redirect the crowd were unsuccessful. It is at this point that a musket was fired and the situation continued to escalate leaving some dead and others wounded (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Was Captain Thomas Preston guilty of murder by ordering his soldiers to fire? Or was he innocent and the soldiers fired out of provocation and their own volition?…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Defend your actions. Critical thinking 2 In the years leading up to the American Revolution, the British sought to establish firm control over their American Colonies. The Boston Massacre also known as “Incident on king street “occurred on march 5, 1770.On evening of the march 5, a lone British sentry guarded the entrance to the Boston Customs house where officials collected import duties for the king .The sentry got into an argument with a barber’s apprentice and swung his musket at him , hitting the boy on the head .Other…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Carr was born between 1739 and 1740. He was an Irish journeyman and apprentice to “Mr. Field, a leather-breeches-maker” (Boston 1775). He grew up in Ireland and was familiar with soldiers and street mobs. So on March 5th, 1770, (date of the Boston Massacre) Carr probably knew that the British were the insinuators of the disturbance. While traversing the street, the soldiers fired and Carr was shot. The bullet went through his abdomen, or stomach. Death was…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, Adams backed and protected the soldiers who were involved in the 1770 Boston Massacre. This act of justice reflected Adams’ fierce integrity. His part in this political drama only increased his public standing and in the long run made him more respected than ever. This act of firm belief established the fairness and principle in Adams’ mind that “no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial...” (66). This mindset from the beginning had transfered and this basis later became the roots for American independence. Adams had taken on many trials, often taking the risky side, but had always stood behind his firm beliefs. Adams always wanted to ensure that the innocent were protected and even though he disagreed with British policies, he wanted to ensure the British soldiers got a fair trial. Moreover, this act of courage only solidified his honesty and loyalty. It proved to the public that he would stand up for what he believed in. That message would later become confirmed and the outlook of these cases created what would be the flashpoint in Adams’…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One chilly night on March 5th, 1770 war broke out between the Patriots and the Loyalists. It occurred on King Street in Boston, Massachusetts. Before this event took place, the British had decided to tax the colonists for many manufactured items acquired through trade. This caused an outrage in the populace of Boston, mostly for the impoverished people. Ever since then, the colonists have been boycotting and protesting against these inequitable laws. Then on this day the Patriots and Loyalists were bickering when a shot was fired into the crowd of the Loyalists and then someone had yelled “Fire!” and in the end, few Patriots were killed and some injured. This anger the Colonists greatly and they deserved justice, this night will always be remembered…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the episode Join or Die, everything starts at the point of the Boston Massacre, due to the Coercive Acts, and most of the hour is spent on debating and choosing sides in court. After the event occurs, John Adams is asked to represent the English guards in the Massachusetts court of law. After hearing their story, he decided that representing them would only be right and just to the law. The viewers do not get to see John Adams’ planning process in the case, other than accepting it, since it jumps directly to the court scene. Here, the people of Massachusetts proceed in saying that the commander of the English guards, Captain Preston, told his men to fire upon the crowd of civilians. Adams opposes this and provides facts and evidence that contradict every part of the civilian argument, which is how he earns acquittal for the case against the guards. Later, Adams is offered a prominent position in the name of the King, but turns it down, which results in his appointment to the Continental Congress. This is where the episode ends, with Adams leaving his family and riding off to join the Congress.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was asked to defend the soldiers and their captain in court the day after the shootings. The soldiers had the odds against them. They were in an American court, with an American judge, and an American jury. No one else was bold enough to take on case as precarious as this case was. McCullough went on to state that John accepted this case because he strongly believed that no man in a free country should be denied the right to counsel and a fair trial (92). Adams knew what troubles he was getting himself into taking on a case like this and the repercussions it had. It would not have been his first difficult case, as he took on a similar case that involved four American sailors killing a British naval officer in self-defense that boarded the American ship. The captain was given a separate trial from the soldiers. Adam’s argued that it couldn’t be proven whether or not the captain gave orders to fire, and with a virtuoso performance given by Adams, the captain was found not guilty.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams was a man who believed in the law, and in fair play. If the soldiers could not get a fair trial, were we any better than the British and their high handed ways.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    His doctor, John Jeffries, presented his statements (in court) in court. According to the doctor, Carr admitted that the soldiers were caused/started and fired in self defense and that he did not blame the soldier who shot him. The prosecution (focused mental and physical effort) on showing that soldiers wanted revenge after many months of being (treated or used in a very mean, unfair way) and (teased and threatened over and over again in a mean way) by townspeople. A witness said in court/gave proof that Private Kilroy had admitted to him that "he would not miss an opportunity to fire on residents". However, the prosecution's case was weak, on cross examination witnesses admitted that the crowd was throwing objects and causing/starting (anger) the soldiers to…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles Lee

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Charles Lee, a general in the American Revolutionary war, is a historic figure in American history. Serving under George Washington, Charles Lee participated in a number of battles. However, history says Charles Lee was treacherous to the cause, all the while that he was in command during that time; he was acting in bad faith toward the Americans. His influence in the army was, at all times, mischievous (General Charles Lee: Traitor of the American Revolution). To the British, Charles Lee was a traitor who turned on England to fight under George Washington. Due to Charles Lee’s treacherous actions against America, it would lead to his downfall in the following years.…

    • 1554 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrick Henry was born in May of 1736 in Hanover County, Virginia. He served in the Virginia House of Burguesses and wrote persuasive speeches that opened the eyes of the colonists and make them see that they were being enslaved. Patrick Henry was the seed of motivation, and the driving force that the colonist needed in order to be free and stand up for what they think its fair. He was important to the revolutionary war efforts because, he encourage people to fight for their rights and not give up.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later after the Massacre still on March 5, 1770 a mob of American colonists gathers at the Customs House in Boston and begins taunting the British soldiers guarding the building. Well I know that the colonist probably shouldn’t have rebelled like that afterwards, but you would have to think if someone you knew and loved got killed you would be pretty mad and would probably do something like that in that time. It would not help if you did not…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays