Preview

Examples Of Enlightened Despotism

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
214 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Examples Of Enlightened Despotism
Enlightened Despotism was a liberal group of Absolutist Monarchs who embraced Enlightenment ideas and implemented reforms. "The chief instrumentality for the improvement of society was not private philanthropy but government action" (Britanica). This means that Despotism was meant to improve the government and not the goodness of others. Some famous Despots were Fredrick the Great, Joesph II, and Catherine the Great.
Fredrick the Great of Prussia embarked on expansion in Silesia, and made the Prussian army dominant on the continent. He modernized bureaucracy, unified the law code, reduced censorship, and improved education. Joseph II is said to be the most radically enlightened He had compulsory education for girls and boys and gave scholarships
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Napoleon and the French Revolution; Explain in what ways Napoleon has come to be considered the greatest enlightened despot. Make sure to include a definition of an enlightened despot.
    • 631 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Napoleon and the French Revolution; Explain in what ways Napoleon has come to be considered the greatest enlightened despot. Make sure to include a definition of an enlightened despot.

    The term "enlightened despot" has been used to describe many great rulers, but it might be misinterpreted. The word "enlightened" means to be influenced by the values and ideas of the Enlightenment. Also, the word "despot" is defined as to exercise dictatorial authority. Considering the definitions of these two words, the term "enlightened despot" would be defined as a person who believes to be influenced by the ideas of Enlightenment and exercises authority similar to that of a dictator.…

    • 631 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    History 111 Study Guide
    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages

    History 111 Study Guide

    Tyrant – Tyrants were members of the aristocracy who gained power in an unorthodox or unconstitutional way.…

    • 2504 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The Soviet Union Influence Louis Xiv Dbq
    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The Soviet Union Influence Louis Xiv Dbq

    Over the course of time, many leaders attempted to control their nation and increase their own power in order to dictate their citizens. Some examples of such leaders are, Louis XIV of France and Joseph Stalin of the Soviet Union. During the age of absolutism, Louis XIV also known as, the “Sun King” became the ruler of France through the theory of divine right, which allowed him to rule his people as an absolute ruler. He controlled his people by implementing a centralized government and forcing the 3rd estate to pay unfair taxes. Joseph Stalin who was another ruler, who went down in history as one of the most ruthless dictators the world has ever known. He used the political system of totalitarianism in order to remain an authority figure…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between Luther And Henry Viii
    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences Between Luther And Henry Viii

    Martin Luther changed germany and christianity in a very great way. Leader of the Protestant Reformation, Luther went against some of the false teachings being spread by the Catholic church. Luther posted the 95 Theses which attacked people who sold indulgences, or fake passes out of purgatory sold for a price. You can tell Luther made a big difference in his area because he…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did Peter The Great Modernize Russia
    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did Peter The Great Modernize Russia

    During the seventeenth and eighteenth century, Europe was changing in a different way. This was due to Peter the great of Russia and Frederick the great of Prussia. They both wanted similar things yet they were both different. Both of them wanted the best for their kingdoms, they wanted change, and that’s exactly what they got. Peter the great of Russia and Frederick the great of Prussia made a big impact in Europe Through their goals, their policies, and legacy.…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Alexander I Dbq
    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Alexander I Dbq

    Emperor Fredrick Wilhelm had to give up portions of Prussia’a territory, yet, due to the pressure by the other great powers. Still it had the chance of rebuilding and unifying much quicker than with a large and divided…

    • 2341 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Differences Between The Enlightenment And Colonial Protest
    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Differences Between The Enlightenment And Colonial Protest

    The Enlightenment refers to the seventeenth and eighteenth century in which a historical intellectual movement advocating reason as a means to establishing an authoritative system of ethics, government, and logic swept through Europe and the Americas. The intellectual leaders regarded themselves as a courageous elite who would lead the world into progress from a long period of doubtful tradition, irrationality, superstition, and tyranny. The movement helped create the intellectual framework for the American and French Revolutions and led to the rise of classical liberalism and modern capitalism.…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis
    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Absolutism Dbq Analysis

    One of the more common forms of government was absolutism. Rulers believed they should have complete control over the country. An excerpt in document 1 states that Prince Machiavelli believed the best way to rule was to be aggressive and feared and thought that the only way the citizen would follow his rule was if he emulated his power and social status. He thought that if he showed kindness and generosity that he would be overthrown. Most of the monarchs believed in divine right, this meant that they thought that they were chosen by God to rule. One of rulers that believed in divine right was King James 1st, his ideas were expressed in document 2 one of his quotes: “….God has the power…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rousseau
    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast John Locke And Rousseau

    After many years of absolute monarchy different philosophers, leaders, and writers idealized new forms of government to create the age of Enlightenment. Important Pre-Enlightenment people such as Queen Elizabeth,Thomas Hobbes, King Louis XIV, and Plato believed that the most successful way to run a country was with a single ruler. The philosophers and the leaders of the Enlightenment era believed that providing citizens with independence and freedom was the best way for a country to thrive and succeed.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Locke And Alexis De Tocqueville
    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Similarities Between Locke And Alexis De Tocqueville

    With the exception of Athenian democracy and Rome during its republican era, mankind, insofar as them being subject to government control, for most of its history has been constrained and dominated by monarchical rule. This classical form of antagonistic dominion has consisted of the tyranny of self-proclaimed (and therefore illegitimate) sovereigns over a class of subjects. However, this system of power has undergone a fundamental transformation as representative democracies have superseded over monocratic bodies. The magnitude and import of this shift can be regarded as progressive, because it is grounded on the belief that a political institution can sustain an orderly society, while simultaneously preserving the liberties and equalities of individuals. John Locke and Alexis de…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    dbq thesis
    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages

    dbq thesis

    The enlightened despots indicated a belief in the equality of men and natural rights. They thought the people should be able to prosper, yet these “enlightened rulers” ruled in a despotic fashion. They believed that they had absolute power and that they were the state. Their words went above everybody's no matter what. In some kind of sense it was kind of like a parent to child relationship. The parent has the right to rule over the child to keep them in line. In the social order group, documents 1 and 6 prove this valid. For example, document 1 states, “ Argue as much as you will, only obey!” This is a contradiction that shows the demanding qualities of an enlightened despot. No one knows better then them. Also, document 6 states,”What is the true End on Monarchy? Not to deprive people of their natural liberty; but to correct their actions, in order to attain the supreme good...” This also shows that the leaders thought that they had the divine right to rule over the people like this. Both documents use social order to prove that the despots really just think that they are the ultimate ruler. In the political group, documents 4 and 8 also prove this valid. For example, document 4 states,” a ruler must be ready to sacrifice his life for the welfare of his subjects.” This shows that the despots were also enlightened. They did think that they were absolute rulers but they also took into account the welfare of their people. The despots wanted to make sure that their people were prospering and improving their quality of life. Also, document 8 states,”her policies will be based on Machiavellianism.” Again, this shows that the despots had the power to act like the state- absolutely and, if necessary, ruthlessly. They had no one standing in their way. It can be thought that these despots were just trying to win the crowd over by pleasing the people. They could achieve popular support this way. They were just really using the thought that they cared about the…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    napoleon despot
    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages

    napoleon despot

    becoming the first, and greatest in history. Coming into power on the wings of the…

    • 1499 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Enlightened Absolutism
    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Enlightened Absolutism

    Enlightenment was the prevailing thought of this era which called for reform, but most believed that the best way to affect change would be through the ruler. Government officials who had the ear of the ruler would instruct them to reform their Government to improve human society. Which resulted in what historians called enlightened absolutism. The new ways of thinking had several effects on both the Monarchical Absolutism and those under its rule. For example, sweeping reforms happened in Prussia, Russia and Austria changing the quality of life for the people for the better. However, even Enlighted Absolutism has its limits as we with the persecution of the Jewish people.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    United States Declaration of Independence and Unalienable Rights
    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    United States Declaration of Independence and Unalienable Rights

    Absolute despotism means entirely led by a government without any people being able to to anything other than what they are told.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Spiritual And Economic Causes Of The American Revolution
    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Spiritual And Economic Causes Of The American Revolution

    As for the upper-classes, who were also the highly-educated people, had already been edified during Deism and the Enlightenment period. Deism and the Enlightenment period, against the rigid doctrines of Puritanism, awakened those high-level people to become open-minded. They tended to trust nature and their own power instead of religious faiths. Thus, it was British governors’ endless obstruction that stimulated their ambition to own complete freedom. As for the lower-classes, it was quite difficult for them to awaken by themselves because what they did days and nights was only to make a living.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics