By this definition, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein both Victor and his creation can be perceived as monsters. Both characters breach socially established boundaries with the creature blurring the lines between life and death as well as humanity and bestiality through his combined circumstances of birth and outward appearance. Frankenstein’s creation is not of human origin, but rather exists as an amalgamation of corpses created through scientific experimentation, “a product of nature – his ingredients are 100 per cent natural – and yet by the process and the very fact of his creation, he is unnatural”. Admittedly, Frankenstein’s creation fits the definition of the archetypal monster as “a large, ugly, and frightening imaginary creature” however, this is only true in regards to his aesthetical appearance for he is shown throughout the novel to exhibit the essence of humanity through his morality, intelligence and emotional capacity. In fact
By this definition, in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein both Victor and his creation can be perceived as monsters. Both characters breach socially established boundaries with the creature blurring the lines between life and death as well as humanity and bestiality through his combined circumstances of birth and outward appearance. Frankenstein’s creation is not of human origin, but rather exists as an amalgamation of corpses created through scientific experimentation, “a product of nature – his ingredients are 100 per cent natural – and yet by the process and the very fact of his creation, he is unnatural”. Admittedly, Frankenstein’s creation fits the definition of the archetypal monster as “a large, ugly, and frightening imaginary creature” however, this is only true in regards to his aesthetical appearance for he is shown throughout the novel to exhibit the essence of humanity through his morality, intelligence and emotional capacity. In fact