Existentialism In Good Will Hunting

The movie I chose to explore the concepts of existentialism was Good Will Hunting. I want to preface this by stating that I noticed not only a lot of existentialist ideas being applied in the movie, but much of the traits of good counseling (caveat: there were also a lot of ethical breaches, such as placing hands on a client’s neck, potentially excessive self-disclosure, broken confidentiality). This included building a rapport, building a relationship based on trust, and even a case of paradoxical intention.

Two proponents of existentialism evident in the movie are “freedom and responsibility” and “striving for identity and relationship to others”. In addition, the story is essentially a progression of Martin Buber’s theory of I/it to I/thou;
His relationships are made of its. However, through his sessions with Sean he slowly begins to open up and form actual relationships with both Sean and, in the end, the girl. He gradually moved toward thou relationships where he allowed himself to be more present with others.

I find it interesting that it could be argued the same transformation occurred with Sean. Even more striking, Buber stated that no relationship is fully mutual if it is based off one person helping the other; to reach a dialogic relationship it must be mutual, and it is that relationship which is a “full human condition.” This dialogic relationship is evident, as both Will and Sean end up helping each other and the result is based of mutual trust and respect.

The other proponent based on freedom and responsibility is also seen. In fact, it is inextricably linked with Will finding his identity. Throughout the whole movie it is apparent that Will is rebelling against the idea of becoming famous off his intelligence. The professor who “mentors” him continually pushes him toward prestigious jobs; Will often sends his friend for interviews instead of going himself despite being provided offers for the jobs