Preview

Explain Aristotle's understanding of the Prime Mover

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1238 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Aristotle's understanding of the Prime Mover
Explain Aristotle's understanding of the Prime Mover (25 marks)
In Aristotle's book the Metaphysics, he calls the cause of all movement the Prime Mover (P.M). The Prime Mover to Aristotle is the first of all substances, the necessary first sources of movement which itself is unmoved. It is a being which is eternal, and in Metaphysics Aristotle also calls this being ‘God’. However, before he came to know the existence of the P.M he first started noticing the constant changes around him, which led him to question the existence and the purpose of the world, universe and the things around us.
He examined that everything that exists was in a permanent state of 'movement' or 'motion'. By 'motion' Aristotle was linking it to the Greek word 'motus' which refers to change. He noticed that everything in the universe is in a state of change, for example, the weather and seasons are always changing. Even the human body is going through the process of change every single day. Everyday the body changes, we grow old and age, we lose hair and skin cells.
This led Aristotle to observe four things:
1) The physical world was constantly in a state of motion and change.
2) The planets seemed to be moving eternally.
3) Change or motion is always caused by something.
4) Objects in the physical world were in a state of actuality and potentiality.
Summing up from these four points Aristotle came to a conclusion that something must exist which causes the motion and change to occur without being moved itself and the 'uncaused change' must be eternal. Aristotle reached this conclusion by observing that if something can change, it exists in one 'actual' state and has the 'potential' to become another state, for example, an actual child is potentially an adult and a cow in a field is potentially a piece of roast beef. He realised that if things come to existence they must be caused to exist by something else and if something is capable of change that means it is potentially

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    He was an empiricist. This means that he believed knowledge comes to us through the senses. So knowledge for Aristotle is a posteriori (post experience) not a priori (prior to experience).…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Matrix 2

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the next column, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Please respond to the questions in bold. All your responses to this assignment should be based on the information given on “Was Aristotle Right or Wrong?”…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Title

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In 250 to 500 words, based on Aristotle’s science of the first philosophy, analyze how Aristotle’s metaphysics may guide contemporary people to knowledge about the world.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Metaphysics is defined as “The study or theory of reality; sometimes used more narrowly to refer to transcendent reality, that is, reality which lies beyond the physical world and cannot therefore be grasped by means of the senses.” It simply asks what is the nature of being? Metaphysics helps us to reach beyond nature as we see it, and to discover the `true nature' of things, their ultimate reason for existing.…

    • 962 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This principle of causality is an essential part of Aristotelian thought. In his mind, Aristotle argued that events happen for a cause which will explain its origin, end and the way it came to be. For him, “everything that comes to be is due to causes.” He criticized his predecessors for their not having clearly explained the why of this, that, and so on. Chance, mythology or fortuitous events are not sufficient enough to solve the problem of cosmology. These causes are divided into four distinct types. He developed this principle from the standpoint of being. For this reason, the basic Aristotelian division is between actual and potential causes, contrary to the traditional division made by the scholastics between intrinsic and extrinsic. As for the actual cause, there is the formal, efficient and final causes and for the potency only the material cause; in the traditional scholastic division, material and formal causes made up the intrinsic cause while the remaining two makes the extrinsic cause.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Examples that Aristotle offered dealt with the five ultimate material elements of reality that he established. These elements of reality are earth, water, air, fire, and either. Each of these elements were moving to get to their telos, or final goal in life. He clearly defined the movement of each of these elements. Earth, such as rocks, fall to the ground to get to the center of the earth. Water also falls to the center of the earth and also lies on top of earth. Air is trying to rise above water. Finally…

    • 1755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle published Metaphysics and Alexander the Great was not content with him doing so. Alexander believed that by publishing the book, Aristotle believed that he was uncovering all the secrets to the masses. Alexander thought that knowing the secrets of metaphysical knowledge was what made him unique, and is should not have made its way to the light and everyone’s acknowledgement.…

    • 398 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle simply explains that causality in basic terms is cause and effect. Every living being and object is the effect from a cause. For example I am the effect from my parent’s conception, they are the cause for my existence. You must have a cause for your…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    9 of Aristotle's Physics: A Guided Study can be understood in such a way that it…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle’s interest in explaining why things exist as they do led to his theory of Four Causes. He rejected Plato’s theory of Forms and was more intrigued by the particular form in which an object took, as opposed to the ‘ideal, perfect’ form. The four causes are: the material cause, the formal cause, the efficient cause and the final cause.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Elements of Argument

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    For hundreds of years there had been only one excepted way of written argument, which was Aristotle’s model. Now there are several more, including Rogers and the Toumlin Rhetoric’s. Every day we face different situations, some good some bad. When the one situation comes up where you are left in disagreement with another person, have you ever thought of how you can argue over the matter? Clearly most do not, and will argue their point until they win or the other person finally understands. I can honestly say I have never thought of how I will argue any matter, until I read about three different forms of written arguments in our text book in English class. In this paper we will go over the three different forms by Aristotle, Carl Rogers, and Stephen Toulmin. Each has their own effective way to get to the point of the argument. The Aristotelian and Toulmin Models are good forms of argument. Though with the Rogerian method the way he uses his empathetic ways is the one for me.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle`S Casualty

    • 4676 Words
    • 19 Pages

    Aristotle was not the first person to engage in a causal investigation of the world around us. From the very beginning, and independently of Aristotle, the investigation of the natural world consisted in the search for the relevant causes of a variety of natural phenomena. From the Phaedo, for example, we learn that the so-called “inquiry into nature” consisted in a search for “the causes of each thing; why each thing comes into existence, why it goes out of existence, why it exists” (96 a 6–10). In this tradition of investigation, the search for causes was a search for answers to the question “why?”. Both in the Physics and in the Metaphysics Aristotle places himself in direct continuity with this tradition. At the beginning of the Metaphysics Aristotle offers a concise review of the results reached by his predecessors (Metaph. I 3–7). From this review we learn that all his predecessors were engaged in an investigation that eventuated in knowledge of one or more of the following causes: material, formal, efficient and final cause. However, Aristotle makes it very clear that all his predecessors merely touched upon these causes (Metaph. 988 a 22–23; but see also 985 a 10–14 and 993 a 13–15). That is to say, they did not engage in their causal investigation with a firm grasp of these four causes. They lacked a complete understanding of the range of possible causes and their systematic interrelations. Put differently, and more boldly, their use of causality was not supported by an adequate theory of causality. According to Aristotle, this explains why their investigation, even when it resulted in important insights, was not entirely successful.…

    • 4676 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle's Argument

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page

    What is a good argument? Aristotle’s was the first person to have a formal theory for argument. He states that an argument is “When, certain things being so, something else results from these by their being so (either generally or for the most part) – there (in the Topics) this is called deduction, here it is called enthymeme” (Rhetoric I.2, 1356b16–18). It’s very interesting how Aristotle’s saw an argument from very different ways. In my opinion an argument is just the view of things from different perspective. I can’t understand how he can relate many words and concepts to this simple word. As Dr. King ask in lecture, what is a good argument? Is the big question. He combined fallacies, validity and induction to create a good…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Time

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages

    that motion could be slower or faster but not time. Aristotle did not have the privilege of knowing about…

    • 2172 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays