Preview

Explain Cricks view of politics using contemporary examples

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
571 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Cricks view of politics using contemporary examples
Explain Cricks view of politics using contemporary examples
This essay will explain Cricks views on politics, as outlined in his book ‘In defence of Politics’ (1962). That politics is a way to bring together differing opinions to resolves problems and disputes in a peaceful manner for the benefit of the majority and for the good of the populace. Cricks belief of what politics entails involves a democratic ideology and as we are considered to have a democratic society in which we live validating with quotes from cricks book. Also Crick highlights the importance of the difference of opinion people have, and such opinions being recognised, and being able to have freedom of speech, being unrestricted in the way that other countries are bound by dictatorship. Crick acknowledges that politics is never a straightforward business, in Cricks words, he describes politics as a “messy business”, being unpredictable, for example international and domestic events. This essay will use contemporary examples to show how this so.
In the 2010 election, there wasn’t any party that had an overall majority (no party had more than half of members of parliament in the House of Commons), which meant that the Conservatives would be unable to have the majority of votes, to pass laws etc, without the support of other parties. In this case, the support came in the form of a formal coalition, with the Liberal Democrats. This being the first time Britain has had a coalition government in seventy years. This situation could said to be in accordance with what Crick asserted, that politics, ‘ideally draws all these groups into each other, so that each individually, and together, can make a positive contribution towards the business of government, the maintaining of order’ (Crick 1962: 18).
Crick (1962: 16) stated that for some 'politics is muddled, contradictory, self-defeatingly recurant, unprogressive, unpatriotic, inneficiant mere compromise, or even a sham or conspiracy' . In contemporary

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Another argument for is that because there is a coalition government, this leads to parliament being split, leading to no overall majority. This then means that disagreement could occur, which could have been avoided in the first place if only one party was involved. If the Prime Minister had complete power, then the decision would have been easier and they could have decided the outcome with their party. However the Prime Minister now has to consider the other parties views, and has to share his/ her powers with other…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    GOV 312L Exam 2 Review

    • 12341 Words
    • 40 Pages

    1. What is politics (as defined in lecture)? What are the two central components of this definition?…

    • 12341 Words
    • 40 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Two broad coalitions with more ideogical differences within them than between them’ relates on how there are different kinds of people within each party so in the Republican party there is liberal and moderate republicans like the governor of New Jersey Chris Christie to the far right hard liners which procide within in the tea party which isn’t an organisation, but is just a group of hard lining conservatives such as Sarah Palin. This is the same within the Democrats there are some quite liberal moderate democrats in which Obama is described as and the Nacy Pelosi the last speaker in the house of representatives and the first women speaker, and then there are some hard lining democrats which are known as the blue dog democrats and are from the southern states. The same can be seen in the UK within the Conservative party which has a group of backbenchers which go by the 1922 committee which are far right conservatives, with a lot of power and money which are very influential and can cause revolt on the Torry backbenches the same is with the tea party they were partly responsible for the shutdown of the US government due to the new health care being trying to be pushed through and the new budgeting bill.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dr. Leskes shares her view point on democracy and the controversy that often accompanies it, “Democracy is messy, and controversial issues have always generated strong feelings” (46). Since democracy is such…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the split of the coalition led to the unpopularity of other parties because the British public felt that the Liberals and Conservatives were unreliable and not strong enough to run the country. The split of this coalition resulted mainly because of U-turns, failures and tension between both the parties. One of the examples of a U-turn was the breaking of pledges that the powers of the House of Lords would be strengthened. The last straw for the coalition was the 'Chanak Crisis' which seemed likely to end up in a war with Turkey, and by this time many stable conservatives including backbench MP's say Lloyd George as a liability and the coalition was failing in its basic purpose; preventing the rise of the Labour party. As a result of their unpopularity, they were actually helping the Labour Party because the electorate was looking for a stable government that wouldn’t go back on their policies and almost cause another war because they didn’t want that.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whilst many within the Conservative Party still believe themselves to be on the Right of the Political Spectrum it has become clear that under Cameron’s leadership the Party has slowly but surely edged its way toward the centre of British Politics. We can see that apart from retaining a few of the traditional Conservative principles the Party has become more liberal in its stance, this could be attributed in part to the Coalition Government but more, in my opinion, to David Cameron’s personal opinions.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Uk Coalition Gov

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    e LHow far has the coalition government forced the Conversatives and the Liberal Democrats to revise their traditional ideological stances?…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics has certainly changed over the last few decades. The idea of British politics become Americanised is one factor in this change. In modern day politics it is obvious that the electorate have different things to take into consideration when they approach the ballot box. In this essay I will debate whether short term factors have more of an effect in voters’ minds than long term factors.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine a noose tightening around your neck. You can hear voices calling you a witch and a traitor. This is what it must have been like to live in seventeenth century Massachusetts. In 1692, mass hysteria swept over Salem village. Hundreds of people were accused of being witches. Many innocent people were killed because of the accusations pinned against them. Many historians researched the Salem witch trials and The Crucible and found that politics played a big role in the trials. The politics of Salem village were a major cause of the Salem witch trials.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Supporting Learners

    • 3099 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Bibliography: 2. Cameron, D. and Clegg, N. (2010) The Coalition: Our Programme f0r Government. London: Cabinet Office.…

    • 3099 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the first things we have learned about politics this semester is that there is a constant struggle over the true definition, especially in how broad or narrow the definition is. When Thomas Jefferson wrote that "Politics are such torment that I would advise everyone I love not to mix with them." it is understood that he is referring to the electoral and governmental aspects of politics. If Dr. Michael Rivage-Seul and Leslie Cagan were to read this quote, they would argue that Jefferson has an extremely narrow view of politics and that if one were to desire a more accurate definition, they would have to look further than the restrictive culturally accepted definition. Martin Luther King, Jr. would also disagree with this definition but he I think he would have a bigger problem with the advice that Jefferson is giving. All three of the authors that we have looked at would, in one way or another, be forced to disagree with Jefferson based on the principles that they try to uphold and emphasize in their writings and speeches.…

    • 930 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Goodin, R., Pettit, P. and Pogge, T. (eds) (2008) A companion to contemporary political philosophy. United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell (an imprint of John Wiley & Sons Ltd).…

    • 3361 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics plays a huge role in everyone’s lives and is always a topic of discussion in today’s society. Peoples political views differ from one side of the spectrum to the other and there is really no right or wrong view, it is all personal opinion. Even the term politics has multiple definitions out there that are accepted by some and rejected by others. Dyck defines politics as “The activity in which conflicting interests struggle for advantage or dominance in the making and execution of public policies.” (Dyck, Rand, 2012). Some people believe this is a proper definition of politics while others disagree and believe other definitions are more appropriate. This paper will illustrate examples that support Dyck’s definition and how it can be…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Criminal Justice Policy

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Liberal Democrats stated that they wanted more community sentences and a bigger focus on anti-terrorist control orders, whereas the Conservatives mainly looked at the problems in society and how fixing those would reduce crime. They called this Britain’s “broken society” and explain how in strengthening families and encouraging more of the same shared norms and values we can then prevent crime. After the general election the parties came to an agreement to form a coalition. This meant that the norms and values of each party would be mixed. On May 12th 2010, the coalition formed and David Cameron was the new Priminister with Nick Clegg as his Deputy leader (Davies 2015).…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The purpose of this paper is intended to summarize my views on what has influenced my understanding of politics and government prior to taking this class, and how my understanding is now since completing this course.…

    • 1136 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays