Explain How Effective Was The National Congress Under The Articles Of Confederation

U.S History Essay
Ann
2. How effective was the national Congress under the Articles of Confederation? Why were the Articles replaced by the Constitution? How was the federal government different under the Constitution?

After the Revolutionary War, originators of the Articles of Confederation had checked that the federal government could never do rob power from the each individual state. The outcome was that the national Congress was very weak and even politically weak which make them not to keep national unity and went almost bankrupt. The specter of rebellion and collapse forced American elites to make a stronger and more centralized government under the Constitution.
During 1777, America’s politicians were well informed that powerful governments could become harsh and cruel. As most people know, in the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson had highlighted King George III’s “long train of abuses” against
the colonies such as unfair and unpopular taxes, quartering acts, and other punishments. With these abuses fresh in mind, the framers of the Articles made decisions that the United States should be only a loose confederation of thirteen nearly independent members. They thought that this structure would bind the states for common defense but would accept republicanism to foster in smaller communities. Therefore, the Articles made a national Congress with the power to keep armies, declare war and peace, govern western lands, and prevent interstate disputes, however lacking the power to extra charge direct taxes. Each state had opportunity of one vote, and most decisions were made by majority rule. Even though the confederation showed good on paper, it proved to be totally non-effective.
First at all, Congress had almost no power to control the states. Trade and domain argument exploded. Throughout the decade during the Articles were in had effect. Secondary, Congress, incapable to taxes of its own, could only ask for money from the each individual state. However, many and variety states rejected to pay. Finally, growing domestic discontent during the working classes, which reached a peak in Shays’ Rebellion, can sure rich Americans that the Articles had to be modify, if not replaced.
Under the new Constitution, the United States was a more fully bound federation than the loose confederation that had occurred under the Articles.
The new federal government was divided into three individual but the same branches, each with obvious powers and authority. The new bicameral Congress was given the power to tariff taxes, during the president was given the authority to put to death and impose congressional laws. The Supreme Court estimated the task of judicial review to discover whether Congress’s laws were constitutional. Therefore, though the Constitution gave the new government greater power and authority, it also instituted protection to keep federal power in check, as the framers of the Articles of Confederation had initially target.
There were changes in the American for example, the articles of confederation replaced by the constitution. It could help to develop the Unite States. Also through this essay, I can know many effective and difference between federal government and constitution. These are very helpful to grow the Unite
States.