Preview

Explain how there can be criminal liability for an omission

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
343 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain how there can be criminal liability for an omission
1) Explain how there can be criminal liability for an omission.
In UK law, there is generally no criminal liability for a failure to act. The exception to this principle is in situations where the defendant had a legal duty to take positive action, but failed in this duty. There are five situation where a person is duty bound to act otherwise he may be criminally liable. Like where a defendant was duty bound by a specific statue or law to act but willingly does not do so, is liable of an offence as in the case of Dytham. Another is if a person is bound to act according to law where he/she has gone under a contract, often relating to their employment. It is their obligatory and statutory duty to act according to law which happened in the case of Pittwood. Another situation is where a duty arises from a relation, there are two types of relation among the people on is by blood and the other is by subsequent relations. Usually parents are duty bound to take care of their children as seen in Gibbons and Proctor. Reliance or voluntary responsibility is if a couple takes a duty of care for a child to look after him and they are being paid for it that is called contractual duty on the other hand where a couple assume a duty of care towards there vulnerable relative they assume a duty of voluntary responsibility to look after him and take care of him, failing to do so they may be charged for criminal offence. This happened in the case of Stone and Dobinson when they took the responsibility for caring for a sick relative. Finally there is a duty arising from commission of a fault. For example if D is has created an unlawful situation without any mens rea but is still responsibility for such act and, they deliberately refuses to deal with the situation and make it safe, then they are surely liable for that negligence as was the case with Miller.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    As a result of Lydia’s actions, Danielle and Gemma have died. Therefore, the extent of Lydia’s criminal liability for their deaths must be explored. Lydia’s culpability for their Murders must be explored before lesser offences of manslaughter can be considered. The majority of law pertaining to Murder is found in the Common Law, rather than being defined in statutes like a great deal of criminal offences. Murder, as defined by Lord Coke, is when a man of “sound memory” at the age of “discretion”, “unlawfully” kills any “reasonable creature” in any “county of the realm”. Prerequisites for murder include that the act take place “under the queen’s peace” with “malice aforethought”.1 This means that the Defendant must not be legally insane, should…

    • 1906 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Introduction to duty of care in health, social care or children’s and young people’s settings…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the Wrong Act 1958 (Vic) s48, an individual has acted negligently when its conduct has caused harm and the person has not had precaution against any risk.…

    • 243 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An omission can amount to the Actus Reus of a crime, however, the general rule regarding omissions is that there is no liability for a failure to act. For example if you see a person drowning you have no obligation to help them. This could be seen as a gap in the law therefore it could said that this is a reason that English Criminal law should impose a duty on general citizens to assist a person in peril. Although this is the general rule there are exceptions. The first exception is when there is a statutory duty to act for example stopping at a red light under the Road Traffic Act 1988. Another example is where there is a contractual duty to act. This where it states in a defendants employment contract that they must act. A case example would be in R v Pitwood where the defendant failed to lower the level crossing barrier which resulted in the victim dying. The defendant was found guilty of manslaughter as he had breached his contractual duty. Finally the third exception is when the duty is imposed by law. There are three situations in which this may happen; failing to rectify a dangerous situation as in R v Miller, when there has been a voluntary acceptance of a duty as in Dobinson v Stone and finally misconduct in a public office as in R v…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Remember The Alamo Essay

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages

    You will often hear phrases such as “Remember the Alamo”or “Remember Goliad,” but do you know what they really mean? During the fight for Texas Independence there were many battles. Although some of these battles may not seem to of made an impact on the war, the places their impact landed may of made the most radiant impact of them all. This impact dwells heavily in the heart of all Texan soldiers. These phrases aspired soldiers to fight for their brethren who have been maliciously slaughtered by the hand of the enemy.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Baby P

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There was lack of communication between the social workers,doctors, police and everyone else involved in the case, they were clearly not working together which eventually lead to the death of Baby P.Everyone involved in baby p's case could of done something to prevent this from happening. Peters GP was critisised for not raising concerns when he found bruising on the childs head and chest. The police were also criticised for not investigation suspicious injuries and the school peters siblings attended hadnt mentioned the difficulties they had with the mother. The social workers and managers didnt think peter was being harmed. All these agencies failed to realise the risk peter connely was at, along with the fact that the mothers violent boyfriend was living at home and could of been abusing the little boy.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether an act is negligent can only be considered in context. In a social care context a duty of care will usually exist where the social care worker has some professional or work responsibility for delivering a service to an individual.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case (R v Pittwood) the court took a different approach to omission and said it was a crime to leave the gate open rather than to shut it as he which would have had to advocate that it was his opening of the gate which was criminalized, rather than his failure to shut it. , this is once again seen as gross negligence like betty has done by not calling the police even though she had the choice to. Dr j’s liability for death Dr James is blatantly liable as through his negligence of not checking the type of blood he has given to the child and then resulting in the child later dying. If he had done the right thing in the first place the child would not have died and then he would not be liable.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction to duty of care in health, social care or children’s and young people’s settings…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Learning and Work Place

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Introduction to duty of care in health, social care or children’s and young people’s settings…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    criminal justice

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An individual may be guilty of a crime by failing to act only if that individual has a legal duty to act.…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Robin J.A. in Malette v Shulman[1], “the right of self-determination which underlies the doctrine of informed consent also obviously encompasses the right to refuse medical treatment. A competent adult is generally entitled to reject a specific treatment or all treatment, or to select an alternate form of treatment, even if the decision may entail risks as serious as death…The doctrine of informed consent is plainly intended to ensure the freedom of individuals to make choices concerning their medical care. For this freedom to be meaningful, people must have the right to make choices that accord with their own values regardless of how unwise or foolish those choices may appear to others.”[2] R v Blaue[3], a famous causation case in criminal law, brings to foreground a thought-provoking debate about whether an individual’s religious beliefs and other psychological values could be included in the ‘thin skull’ rule and whether the refusal to take lifesaving medical treatment breaks the chain of causation that exists between the defendant’s wrongdoing and the purported outcome of that wrongdoing. The facts of the case are as follows -…

    • 1956 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Liability for Omissions

    • 7240 Words
    • 29 Pages

    The law has historically been reluctant to impose a general liability for omissions as opposed to positive acts. This means that there is no general duty of care in tort to act in order to prevent harm occurring to another. In Smith v Littlewoods Organisation, Lord Goff stated clearly that “the common law does not impose liability for what are called pure omissions”. Similarly, in Yuen Kun Yeu v A-G of Hong Kong, Lord Keith stated that people can ignore their moral responsibilities to prevent harm occurring to another, even when it is easily within their power to do so. He added that it would be unthinkable for there to be “liability in negligence on the part of one who sees another about to walk over a cliff with his head in the air and forbears to shout a warning”. Again in Home office v Dorset Yacht Co, Lord Diplock stated that such omissions might attract moral censure, but they attract no liability in English law.…

    • 7240 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    tort notes

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Potential Defence: Contributory negligence - Eckert v. Long Island R. R. Co, Baker v TE Hopkins & Son Ltd - am did not do unreasonably endanger himself because the suddenness of William being thrown off the bus had created a situation in which Sam had instinctively done what every reasonable rescuer would have done…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    hospital and placed on a life-support machine. One night, an intensivecare nurse, Norah, who hated money being wasted on expensive lifesupport machinery and without being authorised to do so, switched off…

    • 1438 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics