John Stuart Mill, (20 May 1806 – 8 May 1873) was a British philosopher who was principally famous for revising and expanding on Jeremy Bentham’s theory of Utilitarianism. Jeremy Bentham said that it is the greatest happiness of the greatest number that is the measure of right and wrong. He then devised the hedonic calculus or the principle of utility as a measure of working out the usefulness of an action according to how much pleasure it creates for how many people. But Mill stated that it is the quality of this pleasure that matters not how much of this pleasure we have. Mill distinguished between higher and lower pleasures and the higher pleasures were qualitatively better and more important than lower pleasures. He argued that, ‘human beings have faculties more elevated than the animal appetites and, once made conscious of them, do not regard anything as happiness which does not include their gratification’ (Mill, 1979, chapter 1). This is basically saying that human beings appreciate higher pleasures more and gain greater pleasure from these rather than having an abundance of lower pleasures. He argues that some kinds of pleasures are more desirable than other kinds. It is not just that we should prefer the higher pleasures to the lower ones, but that a happiness which did not include a higher pleasure was not considered a happiness by human beings. He believes that a higher, qualitatively better, pleasure should be preferred over a lower, more quantitative pleasure. He said that, ‘it is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied’ (Mill 1979). This is him saying that as humans we need to have to reach these higher pleasures in life to really get the most out of it and fully appreciate it. Mill suggested that these higher pleasures were mental pleasures and that the lower pleasures were bodily physical pleasures. There is a link between the two, as to be able to enjoy poetry we have to eat or drink in order to survive. Nevertheless, Mill believed that to pursue purely bodily pleasures – food, drink, drugs and sex, was not as high an objective as those that are intellectually more demanding. When confronted with a choice between a pleasure of the body and the mind, Mill said that of the mind should be preferred. This is because he believes that we gain greater gratification out of these pleasures and therefore they are the right thing to do. So overall Mill maintained that the well-being of the individual was of greatest importance and that happiness is the most effectively gained when individuals are free to pursue their own ends, subject to sticking to rules that protect the common good for all. But this doesn’t mean that he doesn’t agree with the principle of utility and that it does gain the greatest good for the greatest number. He just believed that there were ways of gaining even greater pleasures and this would be by aiming for these higher mental pleasures.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Mill views pleasure and happiness as being the same. “…that pleasure, and freedom from pain, are the only things desirable as ends; and that all desirable things are desirable either for the pleasure inherent in themselves, or as means to the promotion of pleasure and the prevention of pain.” ( Mill. Utilitarianism. 10). He does not acknowledge that pain and misery may actually bring about happiness, this is one of the major flaws in his principle. “… the enjoyment here consisted precisely in the hyperconsciousness…
- 1061 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
To summarize this Mill’s chapter two about what utilitarianism is, basically meaning that individuals would find some kind of pleasure that are more desirable and more valuable to themselves are inherently good. Utilitarianism is pleasurable when the actions are good; when the actions are bad the pleasure decreases. To Mill he compares human pleasures are as equal as animalistic pleasures. It depends on what kind of pleasure people are seeking. For this purpose, Mill mentioned that people would have to look within quality of the pleasure people are seeking as well as quantity.…
- 387 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“The creed which accepts as the foundation of morals, Utility, or the Greatest Happiness Principle, holds that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness” (11). That quote is from “Utilitarianism” written by John Stuart Mill. Mill is noted in history as a man who pushed for radical change of social and legal principles using Utilitarianism as his guide. That quote sums up his belief in that theory. In this essay I will be discussing Mill, the theory of Utilitarianism and how that theory relates to contemporary ethical issues.…
- 430 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
For J.S. Mill, decreasing pain and increasing pleasure is good. However, not all pleasure is the same. Mill argues that intellectual pleasures are superior to bodily pleasures (Mill, Utilitarianism, Chapter 2).…
- 1095 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Mill’s perspective on the human condition is one that I favor immensely opposed to Schopenhauer, because it displays an appreciation for what it means to be a human in its truest form. The fact that we are able to innately enjoy pleasures and reflect on the experience is unique and should be valued. Furthermore, we also are capable of enduring mental suffering and advancing through the struggle as a better being on the other side. Both of these situations effectively demonstrate the privilege we are granted by being human. In this paper I will present why Mill makes a strong argument for this case, and also contribute some of my own ideas to towards the concept.…
- 937 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Pleasures and pain contribute in determining the classification of one’s actions. In Mill’s Utilitarianism, he examines what determines an action to be considered right or wrong, his own version of the hedonistic utilitarianism argument. He claims that these qualities, including the quantity, are an important factor in determining, when included in the consequences, the criteria of an action. The consequences are significant in determining the results of one’s actions.…
- 932 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism, the theory that actions are right if they useful for the majority, the greatest happiness and pleasure for the greatest and majority of people. Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) was an English moral philosopher concerned with social reform, Bentham wanted people to seek pleasure and avoid pain. On the other hand John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) who was a great admirer of Bentham; however, he believed in the principle of utility and the idea that please should be ranked according to quality not quantity. For example: eating a mars bar is a poorer pleasure compared to listening to poetry. Mill believing in pleasures of the mind is greater than pleasures of the body (eating). Within this essay I shall be discussing the different views of Bentham and Mill and how their theories are strengths for the utilitarian system.…
- 824 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Mill’s theory of higher pleasures states that when it comes down to pleasures and satisfaction, people tend to set these empirical grounds for these…
- 1410 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
John Stuart Mill was considered a Utilitarian. The philosophy of Utilitarianism is that an action should be decided by what is best for society. Mill’s philosophy was in part developed by his upbringing as a child. His childhood was restricted and he was raised in an enviroment where is emotionally needs were not met. Also his father was a friend of Jeremy Bentham. Bentham was a philosopher credited with starting the beginings of the Utiltarianism philosophy. He focused on the relationships between the social classes and working towards social reform. His philosophy focused more on social conditions and human behavior than previous philosophies had. He looked at practical solutions for societies problems and less on the metaphysical aspects…
- 1258 Words
- 6 Pages
Powerful Essays -
An excerpt from Exploring Ethics, best exemplifies the comparison from Mill and Kant. Kant's ethical system concentrates exclusively on the reason for an action and does not take into account its results, Mill's system focuses only on consequences. Mill's explained "that this is the singularity is the basis in which you use to judge morality, with those being morally right being those that will manufacture the most happiness because in the end all humans seek happiness above everything else." He also argued that fame, money, and virtue could not replace happiness but could be used to obtain it. Mill’s believed that happiness is the guiding arch that drives…
- 848 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Mill’s Utilitarianism states that in order to be moral, one must make decisions based upon the greatest happiness. In…
- 918 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
John Stuart Mill suggests that a person's ethical decision-making process should be based solely upon the amount of happiness that the person can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks certain criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, not only by pleasure, but by pain as well. This paper will examine Mill's position on happiness, and the reasoning behind it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements will critique the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will reveal what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the guidelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that one should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill believes that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism also states that the actions of a person should be based upon the "greatest happiness principle". This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noting "a being of higher faculties requires more to make him happy." . He acknowledges that some pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing value in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mill's criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly related to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someone's goal in life was to be poor and…
- 1200 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
One of the easiest times of the year to see his idea in action is around the holidays. For instance, around Christmas time, there are Salvation Army buckets placed outside of stores. Meanwhile, somewhere in the parking lot, there is a young child and their mother walking toward the store. As soon as the child sees the bucket they start begging their mother for something to put in the bucket; the mother hands the child some money. As a result, both the child and the person who receives the money from the child inhale some essence of happiness. Along with this, another example of Mill’s ideas is in regards to family. To explain, when a child is young one of the many things that a parent teaches them is that they need to use the bathroom in a real toilet. In other words, a parent and child will face off with one another until the goal is achieved. Mill’s idea is shown when the child and their parent finally reach their goal. To clarify, a when the child finally reaches their goal, there is a sudden outburst of happiness by the parent and the child. In contrast, the parent and child did not begin this journey in order to achieve happiness; they were focused on something other than happiness which allowed them the chance to be happy. However, in both of these examples, an outsider could say that they do not have children; therefore, they are not able to reach their desired level of…
- 1079 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
This view forms the basis of the contrasting argument between him and Kant .Mill principle of `utility also known as the greatest happiness is that, when people act out of duty it justifies the utilitarian principle as a foundation of morals.It explains that actions are right in proportions and promote overall human happiness of everything or anything that can ;possibly tolerate pain.it focus on the consequence of actions.Not on rights or ethical sentiments.it is best to be cultivated and noble…
- 1231 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism derives itself from a combination of hedonism and consequentialism. Hedonism suggests that consequences are good as long as they lead to pleasure, which is the ultimate good in the case of utilitarianism. On the other hand, consequentialism argues that the right action is the one that produces the best consequences, and maximizes utility. Mill argues that the only factor relevant to actions is the amount of pleasure or pain produced, not the motives that propel action. Utilitarianism seems to be based off of a calculation aiming to minimize pain and maximize pleasure. While justice can initially be seen as an objection to this school of ethics, it can be argued that justice complements, and does not challenge the principles…
- 1250 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays