Preview

Explain 'Natural Moral Law'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
664 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain 'Natural Moral Law'
Natural Law can be traced back into the Ancient Greek and Roman worlds. In Sophocles' play 'Antigone', Natural Law is very apparent throughout and the writings of the Greek Philosopher; Aristotle. In his works - 'Nicomachean Ethics' - he wrote;

"The natural is that which is everywhere, is equally valid, and depends not upon being or not being received...that which is natural is unchangeable, and has the same power everywhere.'

The Ancient Stoics emphasised the importance of Logos, or rationality, that governs the world and sees human nature as one natural order. They considered natural law as a law of 'right reason'. In his letter to the Romans, St Paul wrote about a law that is 'written in the hearts' of Gentiles. It is therefore clear that throughout the ancient world, although there is differing terminology, there seems to have been a consensus over the existence of a natural moral law, which dictated the rightness or wrongness of an action that was not dependent upon the laws created by society.

St. Thomas Aquinas developed a fuller account of this 'natural law' in the thirteenth century. This theory is both deontological and absolutist and so his resulting work is focused upon the ethicacy of actions. In his work 'Summa Theologica', Aquinas described natural law as a moral code, which exists within the purpose of nature and was created by God. He says that it is present in every human being. Natural Law exists to aid humans, directing their actions in such away that they might meet their eternal destiny. He argued that there was a basic law, from which all the other natural laws derived. This was to pursue good and avoid evil. For Aquinas, both the intention and the act are important, this is because his theory is based on a mainly deontological view. The only end that he values is God as He is intrinsically good. He believed that acts are intrinsically good or bad because when human beings act in accordance with their ultimate purpose, God is glorified.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Natural Law has roots that stem back to Ancient Greece, and it was Aristotle who really created the approach. It was also depicted in Sophocles’ play Antigone, where the protagonist claims her right to bury her brother despite the King (Creon) ordering that he be fed to dogs. Antigone, (the protagonist) proclaimed this because she believed that there was a higher law than the King’s, particularly, Natural Law. However, it was not until the 13th Century until Thomas Aquinas developed its key features, that it was actually more widely recognised as a moral theory. When we focus on the recipient of the natural law, that is, us human beings, the proposition of Aquinas's natural law theory that comes to the forefront is that the Natural law establishes the basic principles of practical rationality for human beings, and has this status by Nature. These are to be followed universally, as Cicero puts it; it is ‘one eternal and unchangeable law will be valid for all nations and all times’.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The fundamental principles of Natural Law are the primary precepts. The 5 primary precepts are: The preservation of life, Reproduction, The nurture and education of the young, living peacefully in society, To worship God. These primary precepts are always true in that they point people in the right direction and are necessary for human flourishing. The precepts according to Aquinas were seen to be a ‘reflection’ of Gods Eternal Law. The secondary precepts, which are worked out from the primary precepts are dependent on our own judgement. this makes the secondary precepts more theological than deontological. The secondary precepts cannot be read like the primary. For example, the primary precept of reproduction may need secondary precepts that explain what is acceptable sex and what is an acceptable way to have children e.g. IVF. The primary precepts allows for humans to have a clear-cut approach to morality and it also establishes common rules, making it easier for people to make the right decision. Also as the basic principles of preserving human life, reproduction, learning and living in society peacefully are common to most culture’s it make the Natural Law theory more reasonable.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psc 110 Final Exam

    • 3368 Words
    • 14 Pages

    h. Natural law – the idea that ethical principles are apparent in nature to all well-educated, reasonable men and so form the basis of human rights and good government.…

    • 3368 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the textbook, the definition of natural law is the expression of what a person knows in his or her own soul to be right or wrong. The Ten Commandments are a perfect way to apply natural law. A great Commandment to focus on when speaking of natural law is the 7th Commandment, “Thou shall not steal.” In the world that we live in today, I believe that this Commandment is often broken the most. About 75% of the people that rob or steal something feel an immediate guilt, whether they are stealing something very small or very large. The guilt that people feel in their conscience is not taught and is naturally inbred into your soul; This guilt is also called natural law. A good example of how natural law affects a person is the…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Due to the fact natural law is an absolute theory; it provides Christians with the knowledge and certainty of rules which can never be broken. In times of uncertainty in Christian’s lives, especially when there is no biblical scripture to help, natural law can provide clear guidelines or a solid set of rules which must always be followed For example in the case of abortion, natural law states that it is wrong unless an indirect therapeutic abortion. This ensures people are on the right path when making moral decisions and stops anyone taking any immoral actions.…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original concept of Natural law was thought of by Aristotle and was then adapted by Thomas Aquinas to fit the teachings and views of the Roman Catholic Church. Who was concerned with moral law of how human beings should behave .It is understood by reflecting on human nature and by rationally working what will lead to fulfilling your purpose. According to natural law “good” can only be achieved when the subject has fulfilled its end purpose, the end purpose of human beings is to be rational and achieve Eudemonia. Eudemonia is human flourishing, when they achieve happiness. Aquinas also believed natural law was in everyone, so everyone is good. Human’s unconsciously aim for perfection, to avoid evil and aim for god. Because we are made in god’s image, we are unable to knowingly go for evil. As Animals and humans share desires and wishes it’s only the ability to be rational that separates the human beings from the beasts. Aquinas also believed that the only way to discover divine design in nature, would be through human reason. The divine design was created to the essence/the idea before its actual existence. So the only way reason discovers what is right, is by interpreting nature.…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss Sarah Nadwick

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, a strong concern of natural law is the definition of good as it is subjective and personal. Therefore any decision could be seen as morally justified in natural law as long as it can be argued to be good. For example, if a man cheated on his wife and the wife killed him she may have seen that as a good decision as it really…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Moral Law Vs. Natural Law "At the dramatic center of The Scarlet Letter is the idea of the awesomeness and inescapability of the Moral Law, to which all else is finally submitted,"� (Levy 384).…

    • 1849 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural Law: the God-given need for creation, including human beings, to follow what God intended it to be.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Natural Law- a system of law that is determined by nature, and thus universal. Used to analyze human nature both social and personal- and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it.…

    • 2624 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first chapter; ‘The Law of Human Nature’ the author tells his reader how the law of nature is seen by today’s thinkers, and of older thinkers. That the law is not merely another natural law as to gravity is, but how it is more of a way of thinking. Showing how all people of a way of knowing how to act, for example when he had said “.. The human idea of decent behavior was obvious to everyone”. In this chapter he also talks about, how the natural law has much criticism and how some say it could not be true, because of different ages and civilizations have had different ideas about how to basically think and act. He disagrees with this claim because; despite where you come from you will always know what is real right and wrong.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Laws were just as important to ancient societies as they are today, keeping an essential balance between interacting individuals. Without them, members of a society would be able to treat their fellow citizens in any way they wished, even if for purely personal gain. Some of these laws were made by the leader or leaders of the society. These were accepted as being for the common good. Other laws were developed within the society, things deemed "socially acceptable." Examples from today might be chewing with your mouth closed and dressing formally for a church service. There were also laws that were set by religious beliefs or moral codes and were highly respected. Breaking these laws would mean doing something like stealing, killing, or cheating. As cultures evolved, and beliefs changed, written, social, and ethical laws often conflicted with each other and created conflicts in society, as described by the play Antigone by Sophocles. In this play, there is a clear conflict between the written law made by the king, and the higher law, dictated by the religious beliefs of the time.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The theory of natural law originates from Aristotle’s idea of goodness as fitness for purpose and stoic’s concept of a universal law of reason which is in agreement with nature. What we now call human nature. This point is then furthered by Aquinas who agrees with the argument but furthers it by linking it with his Christian belief by saying following this law is equivalent to following the command of God as human nature is in us inbuilt into us from when God created us.…

    • 1800 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Are we naturally moral creatures? Do we always act towards the common good of others? I am positive that we do not, and in fact, as much as society wants to, we go against our morals and lead with our ‘feelings’. These feelings may feel right, but it doesn’t mean they will lead you in the right path to fulfil your ultimate end, true happiness. Hitler was a passionate man driven by feelings, but what he felt and did during the World War Two era was not for the sake of the common good, and was not morally right. In today’s society we often struggle between what is legally right and what is morally right. “Law is nothing other than a certain promulgated ordinance of reason to the common good by one who has charge of the community.” (McInerny, 617). In this respect there are many instances where human laws, and more specifically Canadian laws, are derived from natural law. The idea of natural law, according to St. Thomas Aquinas is that these laws are presented to enable a person to act towards the common good, in order to connect with their Summum Bonum, in other words their ultimate end. Aquinas believes that every person’s ultimate end is to commune with Jesus Christ and God Almighty. Natural law itself reflects what is morally right for the common good; while human laws are the written rules and regulations that look to preserve order, while, in most cases, staying true to natural law. I would, however, like to make the argument that not all human laws are derived or are based on natural law. In fact I would like to pull instances directly from the Criminal Code of Canada and exhibit how do they not only create chaos, but that they contradict natural law.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays