Preview

St. Thomas Aquinas: the Human Law and Natural Law Debate

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1517 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
St. Thomas Aquinas: the Human Law and Natural Law Debate
The Human Law and Natural Law Debate
Heather Saunders
250583261
Thomistic Philosophy 2214
Dr. Fox
March 21, 2012

The Human Law and Natural Law Debate
Are we naturally moral creatures? Do we always act towards the common good of others? I am positive that we do not, and in fact, as much as society wants to, we go against our morals and lead with our ‘feelings’. These feelings may feel right, but it doesn’t mean they will lead you in the right path to fulfil your ultimate end, true happiness. Hitler was a passionate man driven by feelings, but what he felt and did during the World War Two era was not for the sake of the common good, and was not morally right. In today’s society we often struggle between what is legally right and what is morally right. “Law is nothing other than a certain promulgated ordinance of reason to the common good by one who has charge of the community.” (McInerny, 617). In this respect there are many instances where human laws, and more specifically Canadian laws, are derived from natural law. The idea of natural law, according to St. Thomas Aquinas is that these laws are presented to enable a person to act towards the common good, in order to connect with their Summum Bonum, in other words their ultimate end. Aquinas believes that every person’s ultimate end is to commune with Jesus Christ and God Almighty. Natural law itself reflects what is morally right for the common good; while human laws are the written rules and regulations that look to preserve order, while, in most cases, staying true to natural law. I would, however, like to make the argument that not all human laws are derived or are based on natural law. In fact I would like to pull instances directly from the Criminal Code of Canada and exhibit how do they not only create chaos, but that they contradict natural law.
What is natural law? According to St. Thomas Aquinas that natural law is “nothing other than the participation in eternal law on the part of the rational

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Natural Law has roots that stem back to Ancient Greece, and it was Aristotle who really created the approach. It was also depicted in Sophocles’ play Antigone, where the protagonist claims her right to bury her brother despite the King (Creon) ordering that he be fed to dogs. Antigone, (the protagonist) proclaimed this because she believed that there was a higher law than the King’s, particularly, Natural Law. However, it was not until the 13th Century until Thomas Aquinas developed its key features, that it was actually more widely recognised as a moral theory. When we focus on the recipient of the natural law, that is, us human beings, the proposition of Aquinas's natural law theory that comes to the forefront is that the Natural law establishes the basic principles of practical rationality for human beings, and has this status by Nature. These are to be followed universally, as Cicero puts it; it is ‘one eternal and unchangeable law will be valid for all nations and all times’.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Natural Law is a deontological theory of ethics. According to Thomas Aquinas it is absolutist and depends on the idea that God created everything with a purpose and supreme good is found when that purpose is fulfilled. For Aristotle, who heavily influenced Aquinas’ ideas, he believed that supreme good for humans is happiness. Thomas Aquinas agreed with Aristotle, but saw a human’s supreme purpose to be perfection.…

    • 343 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Psc 110 Final Exam

    • 3368 Words
    • 14 Pages

    h. Natural law – the idea that ethical principles are apparent in nature to all well-educated, reasonable men and so form the basis of human rights and good government.…

    • 3368 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 2 Nutrient

    • 573 Words
    • 5 Pages

    When comparing the two categories of nutrient standards, the Dietary Reference Intakes and the Daily Values, one difference between the two is:…

    • 573 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to the textbook, the definition of natural law is the expression of what a person knows in his or her own soul to be right or wrong. The Ten Commandments are a perfect way to apply natural law. A great Commandment to focus on when speaking of natural law is the 7th Commandment, “Thou shall not steal.” In the world that we live in today, I believe that this Commandment is often broken the most. About 75% of the people that rob or steal something feel an immediate guilt, whether they are stealing something very small or very large. The guilt that people feel in their conscience is not taught and is naturally inbred into your soul; This guilt is also called natural law. A good example of how natural law affects a person is the…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miss Sarah Nadwick

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However, a strong concern of natural law is the definition of good as it is subjective and personal. Therefore any decision could be seen as morally justified in natural law as long as it can be argued to be good. For example, if a man cheated on his wife and the wife killed him she may have seen that as a good decision as it really…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Many of Thomas Aquinas moral ethics are still relevant today in the United States simply because the natural and human laws are apart of the US Constitution which applies to everyone in the American society. Aquinas simply states a right or wrong solution to his models using works from Aristotle and the bible to justify the three laws he applies. Theft and robbery were acts that went against the natural law. Bernie Madoff was guilty of violating his human rights of the natural law by committing Theft, and Fraud. Bernie Madoff was a well-known and respected stockbroker who committed the largest white-collar crime in Wall Street history. Madoff was found guilty for eleven felony counts and sentenced to 150 years in jail. Madoff used a ponzi scheme to collect investors money giving the investors intentions each person would be promised a gain of ten percent or more. Madoff greed not only affected the rest of his life in a horrific way but it also affected the common good of the community.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Natural law, when associated with the will of God, can have penalties that are of another world. Meaning that because some view natural law as the will of God and may say that these laws aren’t man- made, but rather they are basically our moral principles to follow. This can blur the line between what the law is and what we should do to be morally right. This can make it difficult to enforce natural law because Gods will can be pretty vague and hard to govern, since not everyone lives by the same standards of what Gods will is. Also, the penalties are from another world, so that can be hard to govern and enforce.…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As defined by the Philosophical Dictionary, the Natural Law Theory is "In moral philosophy, a norm, custom, or set of beliefs shared by people living in different cultures or eras. Such a “law” is supposedly derived from Nature (via reason or some other natural human faculty) and is considered binding on all humans everywhere. Ancient Stoicism, for example, held that there are eternal laws that govern all human actions and that happiness depends on recognizing and living in harmony with these fundamental “laws of nature.” Similarly, Aquinas argued that God established a set of universal laws – ascertainable through reason alone (hence available to everyone, regardless of their religion) – that operate for the welfare and benefit of all creatures.”…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Natural Law- a system of law that is determined by nature, and thus universal. Used to analyze human nature both social and personal- and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it.…

    • 2624 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    I am honored to be among the lecturers in this series on natural law. Many of the speakers are among my heroes and friends. One of my heroes, Alasdair MacIntyre, used one of his favorite terms in his talk: he spoke of "plain persons" and their grasp of morality and natural law in contradistinction to the experts and professional philosophers and their grasp of these matters. A few years ago in Dallas he gave a talk entitled "Do plain persons need to be moral philosophers?" When I was asked to give the response to his talk, I was most honored because I considered Prof. MacIntyre one of the foremost moral philosophers in the world and it was a thrill to comment on his work. I felt dreadfully underqualified — I felt like some high school kid going up against Larry Bird — until I realized that I need not respond as an expert, as a moral philosopher of his caliber, but that I could respond as the quintessential plain person — for that is what I am. After all, I am Janet Smith, daughter of John and Anne Smith; I grew up at 5 Hill Street and went to Home Street School — I could go on but it is all very plain.The point I am making here is not merely a flip one — designed to ease us into more serious matters through an attempt at humor. There is a serious point here — natural law, is the "plain person's" morality — in a sense it is simply plain old common sense. There are profound and sophisticated ways at explaining natural law, but the practiceof reasoning in accord with natural law principals, according to the theory itself, is natural to plain persons — that is, natural to all mankind for natural law holds that many of the most fundamental principles of moral reasoning are obvious, that is easily known by all. Yet, in spite of the plain commonsensicalness of natural law, it can seem shocking and provocative in many ways, for like natural law, plain old common sense does not command a lot of followers these days and can…

    • 6621 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Aquinas's political and legal theory is important for three reasons. First, it reasserts the value of politics by drawing on Aristotle to argue that politics and political life are morally positive activities that are in accordance with the intention of God for man. Second, it combines traditional hierarchical and feudal views of the structure of society and politics with emerging community-oriented and incipiently egalitarian views of the proper ordering of society. Third, it develops an integrated and logically coherent theory of natural law that continues to be an important source of legal, political, and moral norms.…

    • 2039 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aquina's five objections and responses have practically the same structure. The difference lies in the fact that in the last two ways, that of Aquinas, does not mention the impossibility of infinitely infinite series, although they are assumed. Certain authors belonging to the Modern Age (epistemological paradigm) have questioned the conclusion about the existence of God undermining the premises of the five Thomistic demonstrations. You have seen how Hume's critique of the idea of causality renders the demonstration of the existence of God unfeasible; At most, the existence of God is reduced to the level of a mere belief emerged, not of experience, but of imagination.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Thomas Aquinas’s On Law, Morality, and Politics, Aquinas agrees completely with Aristotle’s notion of natural law. Like Aristotle, he believes that everything has a purpose, which is determined and fulfilled by natural law. However, he makes a very clear contradiction to Aristotle’s beliefs when it comes to the issue of what the purpose of justice is. Aristotle believes that justice is the presence of all virtue, while Thomas believes that Justice is one thing on its own, he believes that it is specifically the virtue of a good citizen.…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurisprudence - Natural Law

    • 9645 Words
    • 39 Pages

    Natural law theory is not a single theory of law, but the application of ethical or political theories to…

    • 9645 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays