Preview

Explain the Origin and the Concept of ‘Neighbour Principle’. Illustrate with Decided Cases the Application of This Principle.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1869 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain the Origin and the Concept of ‘Neighbour Principle’. Illustrate with Decided Cases the Application of This Principle.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION 2

Explain the origin and the concept of ‘Neighbour Principle’. Illustrate with decided cases the application of this principle.

Above all, I want to explain the ‘Neighbour Principle’’. Lord Atkin stated his famous neighbour Principle as was that 'You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour `.This is sometimes known as the neighbour principle.

By `neighbour`, Lord Atkin did not mean the person who lives next door, but `persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that i ought to have them in contemplation as being so affected when i am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question`. The test of foresee ability is objective; the court asks not what the defendant actually foresaw, but what a reasonable person could have been expected to foresee.

Neighbour principle is one of a kind of circumstance in Negligence. Negligence is the most important tort in modern law. It concerns breach of a legal duty to take care, with the result that damage is caused to the claimant. Torts other than negligence are normally identified by the particular interest of the claimant that protect. For example, nuisance protects against interference with the claimant's use and enjoyment of land, while defamation protects against damage to reputation.

`Negligence` is defined in Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort as `the breach of a legal duty to take care which results in damage, undesired by the defendant, to the plaintiff` .There is no one single definition of the word `tort` or tortious liability` that is acceptable to the author as being complete enough to tell a reader what `tort` or tortious liability` is all about. One of the better definitions is given by Winfield and reads as follow: ` tortious liability` arises from the breach of a duty primarily fixed by the law; this duty is towards persons generally and its breach

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pa201 Unit 3 Assignment

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Negligence is defined as “the failure to exercise the standard of care that a reasonably prudent person would have exercised in a similar situation; any conduct that falls below the legal standard established to protect others against unreasonable risk of harm.” Black’s Law Dictionary 1133 (9th ed. 2009) …

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to Cheeseman (2013), negligence is a "A doctrine that says a person is liable for harm that is the foreseeable consequence of his or her actions" (p.91). The elements of negligence include:…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Intentional torts can be described as deliberate acts to harm someone. Negligence can be described to deliberately choose not to act in order to fix a problem which ultimately results in someone being harmed. There are several elements that need to be present in order for a claim to be considered negligence (Melvin, 2011). According to our text these elements need to be present in order to be considered negligence:…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are also several types of negligent torts. Two of which are: duty to rescue and duty to invitees. Intentional torts against consist of battery, assault, false imprisonment, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and invasion of privacy. The key word in all of these intentional torts is intent or purpose to cause harm to another. Intentional torts against property include trespass of land, nuisance, conversion, and trespass to personal property. Intent and purpose are also why these are considered intentional. The key difference between these two torts is that one is against people and the other is a misuse of another’s property. An individual has to purpose commit these acts. Negligent torts consist of different types of duties. Duty is when a person with a legal duty to another is required to act, reasonably, under the circumstances to avoid harming the other person. Some examples of this are duty to rescue and duty to invitees. Duties are basically an obligation that one person is legally bound to perform for another. In comparing the two types of torts we find that intentional torts are torts that people commit against other people. Negligence also others but it is a failure to perform that causes the injury or unjust…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A. Beneficence and nonmaleficence- This principle represents a psychologist dual obligation to strive to do good and avoid harm. It intends to guard against harm to anyone that you come in contact with.…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Elements Of Negligence

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page

    Negligence is a failure to use reasonable care that results in harm to another party.…

    • 94 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rule: Base on Atkin's NeighbourTest, to prove that the defendant (Li) owed the plaintiff (Paul Henri) a duty of care , we must prove that at the time of Li's careless act, the consequences caused by that careless act were reasonably foreseeable and directly related to the plaintiff (Donoghue v. Stevenson).…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Duty of Care Unit12

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages

    "You must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions which you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour. Who, then, in the law is my neighbour? The answer seems to be persons who are so closely and directly affected by my act that I ought to have them in contemplation as being so affected when I am directing my mind to the acts or omissions which are called in question."…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Worth The Alert Case

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    E –The Principle of "Do No Harm" is a no brainier, I also believe that The Principle of Fidelity, The Principle of Lawfulness, ECI, "The…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Joel Feinberg says that the harm principle can require certain types of actions. He agrees that the harm principle prevents harm from happening to the public but he also interprets the harm principle in a way that gives the public access to certain types of benefits that prevent harm. However, these benefits are made available by requiring taking action on the public. These benefits include but are not limited too, items such as paying taxes. By requiring the public to pay taxes then they are supporting public benefits.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tort Reform in the Us

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Tort law is a type of law that is designed to offer remedies to civil wrongs. Unlike contractual damages that occur, where responsibility is predetermined, tort law is designed for someone who is legally injured to be able to recover damages from the person who is deemed legally responsible, or liable for such injuries. Tort law is broken down into three main categories, negligence, strict liability, and intentional tort. In negligence tort one is accused of causing damages through their carelessness. After accusation of negligence the plaintiff must be able to show that the defendant had duty of care, and that a breach of duty had occurred that caused the damages. Strict liability is a legal doctrine that makes someone responsible for damages caused by their actions (e.g. product liability). Intentional tort is much like negligence, but instead of one causing damages by accident, there was reckless action or intent to cause the damages that occurred (e.g. assault, battery). Tort cases are based on common law, which is laws that have been developed through court decisions, i.e. precedent. However, in certain cases tort law can also be based on statutory law laid out by the legislature. It is up to the court to decide which rule should take a higher standing depending on the case.…

    • 1193 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    S. Mill, the only and liable reason for interfering into other people’s lives is if they do harm to others. This principle is very common and applied principle in many social and political settings. A supporter of many unacceptable issues in our society refers to this principle if they get into an argument of such nature. Drug legalization supporters often take shelter under this principle of J.S. Mill’s.…

    • 1284 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hot Coffee

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages

    A tort is a non-criminal civil wrong that is caused either on purpose or through negligence (Simon, Eddins…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Identify the argument that neighbourly relations are characterised by friendly distance. Before I identify the argument that neighbourly relations are characterised by friendly distance, I want to explore what neighbourly relations are, their responsibilities, how and why they act in a particular but also whether it’s the same throughout the…

    • 585 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurisprudence - Natural Law

    • 9645 Words
    • 39 Pages

    legitimate; into a question of what is the relationship between natural law theories and the…

    • 9645 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics