Preview

Explain The Problems With The Framers Of The Constitution

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
546 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain The Problems With The Framers Of The Constitution
The framers of the United States constitution ultimately decided to give more power to the federal government rather than the state governments. There are some problems with the Articles of Confederation,I will explain the federal government and the state government.
The framers of the constitution gave more power to the to the federal government rather than the states, Federalists and Anti-Federalists argued and fought over who should have more power. But it all had to come down to one or the other having more power.

There are 13 articles in the constitution, the anti-federalists were all about the articles becuase it gave more power to the states, the federalists did not agree with that. There were many problems with the articles of confederation one of them being that 9 of the 13 states had to agree with a law in order to pass it. Another problem was since there was no president or executive branch there was no way to guarantee laws passed by congress were carried out. There were also no courts to judge or pune the law because there was no national court system.
…show more content…
The federalists wanted more power to the president.”Document 1 states”, “I would propose next that in addition to the present federal powers, the national government should be armed with positive and complete authority in all cases which require uniformity”. The writer of the document believes in federal powers because he wants more power to the government not the states. The anit-federalists do not want the government to have power because. “Document 2 states”,”After such a declaration, what security does the constitution of the several states afford the liberty of the press and other invaluable personal rights, not provided for by the new

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Before the federal system government, there was an article of confederation (1776-1787), which was designed to keep more power in the states government, and less power in the national government. The article of confederation had much weakness, which calls for a change in the government system. The federal government system which is also known as “Federalism” is a division of power between a central government and state/regional government, and the division of powers are as follow; delegated powers (enumerated), which is expressly given to the national government; reserved powers, which reside in the state; and the concurrent powers granted to both national and state government. The balance and boundaries between the federal government and state…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were other ways in which the power of the states was stated and the confederation type of structure was emphasized under the Articles. The original Congress of the United States was founded on the principle that each state was the equal…

    • 1180 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    MidTerm Essay The Constitution divided the powers between the Federal,State and Local governments in a very specific way. Which we now call Federalism,but before this we had the Articles of Confederation. The reason we did not keep the Articles of Confederation was because it was to weak and gave too much power to the states. But it did set up a foundation which helped bring us the division of powers between Federal,local and state governments.…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Federal Government showed to be ineffective under the Articles of Confederation. The Government lacked power, with large state governments showing to be superior. The U.S Constitution proposed a new form of government. With the addition of three separate branches of government, being, legislative, executive, and judicial, the Constitution also created a stronger Federal Government, weakening state governments. As southern states with larger populations were against the ratification of the Constitution, northern states consisting of fewer, more wealthy people, supported it. Federalists and Antifederalists took sides, prompting debate over a solution to the issue. The writings of the U.S Constitution produced major concerns at the center of the Constitutional Convention as the future of America had to be written.…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Any power the legislative authorities of the central government possessed under the Articles was undone by the absence of executive authority to enforce the meager amount of verdicts that against all odds were passed. Perhaps the weakness of the Articles is to be blamed on opposing individual state interests; however, it was still the Articles that were to blame for the division of the Union nevertheless. Though some historians believe that with minor alterations the Articles of Confederation could have survived for many more years,[15] its fundamental flaw – its lack of a 3 house Congress – was destined to be efficacious in the eventually switch to the Constitution. What the Constitution really achieved for the country was a foundation of authority. It states in black and white the powers of the Congress and the rights given to enforce those powers, whereas the Articles only gave Congress an arbitrary right to rule that could easily be ignored because of its noncommittal language and potential to be…

    • 2155 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Constitution DBQ

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    At the end of the American Revolution, the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose to how power should be divided between local and national governments, common laws or the protection of the unalienable individual rights. Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely as it formed a template for a new document. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but instead, constructed the Constitution. One of many distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the creation of the legislature. Representation of one state, while disregarding the population of the state, angered many people. The Constitution is known today as the foundation of American government. But before its ratification, debates arose regarding several unresolved and problematic factors that the Articles of Confederation failed to come to a resolution. Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had far more power than did the federal government. As a result, when writing the Constitution, they sought to maintain balance between state and federal power in a way where it would benefit the nation, shifting the power to the federal government. Slavery was never mentioned in the articles, yet the North and the South began a dispute over its existence. Alongside the creation of legislature defining distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, the division of power between state and federal government and the existence and purpose of slavery are issues debated prior to the ratification of the Constitution.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To create a stronger national government and to guard against the misuse and abuse of its powers, the Federalists believe that the government should have separate powers, so they wanted to divide the governing powers up between different branches of the government. I agree with what the Federalists wanted to do here because one branch can only take so much. So, to make things easier and fair, they wanted to split the powers up.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Federalists strived to create a more efficient government. As George Washington illustrated “thirteen sovereign, independent, disunited States are in the habit of ….refusing compliance with our National Congress at their option. Would to God that wise measures be taken in time to avert the consequences we have much to reason to apprehend.” (Document 3) George Washington is stating that the states were poorly governed and were in need of unification. Since the states are losing interest in the ratification, the federalists had to create a stronger central government. Another example that supported…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The federalists and anti-federalists had a very intense debate during the ratification of the constitution. Both sides had to make several compromises in order to be able to do something better for the people. I myself agree more with the views of the anti-federalists. They believed that the power should be shared by the states in order for things to be fair. If the Federal government had all the power, chaos would rule our way of life. The individual rights and shared power is what makes things flow smooth in our government.…

    • 515 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federalist and Antifederalist had different ideas and beliefs of the nation’s government. Antifederalist believed in more power for the states and did not agree with a strong central government. They preferred the Articles of Confederation. Antifederalist did not want to ratify the Constitution due the fact there was no bill of rights and there was too much power in the national Constitution and not the States. On the other hand, Federalist believed in a more centralized national government. Federalist propose the separation of powers, which the act of vesting the legislative, executive, and judicial powers of government in separate bodies.…

    • 261 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Confederation Dbq

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1787, a couple of years after America broke away from England, the constitution we use today was made. Before, starting in 1777, the states operated under a government they called the “Articles of Confederation.” This government said that each state should have its own independence, and should operate within their own government. After 6 years, this government didn’t work well, because of civil unrest, bad trade, and inflation. A group of men led by George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and others, believed in this constitution. These people were called Federalists. These federalists believed that the states should be operated by one unified single government. The Federalists wanted to write a new constitution,…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the other hand, the Federalist favored a government that was constructed with broad powers. They were interested in a government that was able to fight against foes, guard against domestic strife, promote commerce, and expand the nations economy. The Anti-federalist believed some of this but just highly feared governmental power. The Federalist made a very important point. They stated that in order for the government to carry out these orders, they needed the necessary power to do so. They felt that the right way of controlling power abuse was not by depriving the government of power, but knowing that the governments power would be oversee by the Constitutions checks and…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists, had disparate visions about how the country should be administered, which would cause a complication with our founding fathers, who formulated a way to run the country. Federalists assumed to have a forceful central government, central bank. Federalists presumed that in a government, checks and balance works out, so there is no tension between individuals. With Federalists, they remained with the strong central governments, whereas the Anti- Federalists wanted to remain with the British government. In the Anti- Federalists, they always thought that the army would cause great destruction. Centinel No 1, states that "The Congress may construe every purpose for which the state legislatures now lay taxes,…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays