Preview

Constitution DBQ

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1340 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Constitution DBQ
The Foundation of Our Government
At the end of the American Revolution, the free states needed some sort of control that would generate to a unified country. Issues arose to how power should be divided between local and national governments, common laws or the protection of the unalienable individual rights. Their first attempt at solving this issue was the Articles of Confederation, which was a failure for the most part, but not completely as it formed a template for a new document. After the failure of the articles, the state delegates tried to revise the articles, but instead, constructed the Constitution. One of many distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the creation of the legislature. Representation of one state, while disregarding the population of the state, angered many people. The Constitution is known today as the foundation of American government. But before its ratification, debates arose regarding several unresolved and problematic factors that the Articles of Confederation failed to come to a resolution. Under the Articles of Confederation, the states had far more power than did the federal government. As a result, when writing the Constitution, they sought to maintain balance between state and federal power in a way where it would benefit the nation, shifting the power to the federal government. Slavery was never mentioned in the articles, yet the North and the South began a dispute over its existence. Alongside the creation of legislature defining distinction between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, the division of power between state and federal government and the existence and purpose of slavery are issues debated prior to the ratification of the Constitution.

A major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is the legislation. The Articles of Confederation and the Constitution, although both written documents explaining how the American government would be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Without the decisions the government made together we would've never came into an equal equality, without solving the world’s biggest problems. In the summer of 1787 , fifty five delegates representing twelve of the thirteen states met in philadelphia to fix the national gov’t. The problem was that the government under the articles of confederation, the challenge was to create a strong central government without letting anyone get too much power. How did the Constitution Guard against Tyranny? In further reading you will see how they divided the powers that were given to them to help the nation and states around the world, that fills up the world’s problems.…

    • 630 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They also stated that Congress would become independent of their constitutes (Document A). In addition, the Articles of Confederation did not grant the central government the power to regulate taxes. Instead taxation was left to the individual states. Under The Articles of Confederation the government could not levy taxes which added to a huge economic problem.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Articles of confederation created in 1776, was the first constitution of the United States of America. The Articles of Confederation had served as the agreement between the thirteen sovereign states and was ratified by 1777. The Articles had served as the start of a new government that had brought many benefits and prosperity to the country. Even with a strong state government, when faced with foreign and issues on a national level, the Articles lacked a strong central government. From 1781-1787 the articles started debilitating, even with all the gains that it had as a government.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dbq 1850's

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although the Constitution was not the only factor leading to sectional tension in America, there are many strong points in the North and South favoring the statement, "By the 1850's the Constitution, originally framed as an instrument of national unity, had become a source of sectional discord and tension and ultimately contributed to the failure of the union it had created."It is known that the union did not last, for there was the Civil War. If the majority of congressional leaders could agree on what the constitution implied, then there probably would not have been a civil war. From several of the documents, there are arguments about what the constitution states. “To the Argument, that the word ‘slaves’ and ‘slavery’ are not to be found in The Constitution, and therefore it was never intended to give any protection or countenance to the slave system, it is sufficient to reply, that no such words are continued in the instrument, other words were used, intelligently and specifically, to meet the necessities of slavery.” Ralph Waldo Emerson, address on the fugitive slave law. This indicated the constitution can be interpreted differently, and when used with other pertinent documents, can be incongruous. Those views that differentiated were of those in the North and South.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution was made in order to keep peace between its people however, certain topics were not talked about. As an emerging country many new problems and situations occurred and were brought up. Economically the North and the South were completely different. The constitution failed to address slavery, which was important to the South By not addressing this topic the North and the South began having tension between each other. Not talking about slavery backfired because the North and the South disagreed on the topic of slavery and they eventually went to war, due to the differences based on the constitution.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1987 DBQ

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Constitution was never explained to how it was meant to be interpreted, which cause many disagreements, which ultimately started sectionalism, which is the loyalty to interests or views in one’s region of a country rather than the views or interests of the country as a whole. Sectionalism kick started the idea of sucession from the union, which started the bloodiest war on american soil, the Civil War. The misinterpretation on the views of slavery was the biggest argument as shown in multiple documents, (Document E), “To the Argument, that the word ‘slaves’ and ‘slavery’ are not to be found in the Constitution, and therefore it was never intended to give any protection or countenance to the slave system, it is sufficient to reply, that no such words are continued in the instrument, other words were used, intelligently and specifically, to meet the necessities of slavery.” This basically means that the constitution could have many interpretations on the basis that no “right” interpretation was ever stated.There were many feuds between documents following the Constitution such as the Compromise of 1850 as show in in the map of (Document A) where the country is broken into 2 parts, not unified because of slavery, along with the Fugitive Slave Law, (Document…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitution Dbq

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page

    After years of struggling to break away from Britain the United States was finally victorious.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Dbq Essay

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The birth of a nation was sparked solely from the tyrany Great Britain showed towards the colonies in the years leading up to our nation declaring it's independence. Ten years later our Founding Fathers saw us heading in the same direction. A sense of that same tyrany could eventually be found in the formerly written Articles of Confederation; which was specifically created to erase the tyrany our nation's citizens had loathed for so long. To say that the Founding Fathers scrapped the Articles of Confederation solely for personal gain is leaving out so many variables. If I were a delegate to the Convention, and upon arriving I heard the reasoning for writing a new Constitution, yes I would've stayed. To truly answer this, one must objectively…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This nation is not perfect, so we can only hope to improve it. To do so, we must find and criticize the hypocrisy in our country’s history with the fairness they once promised to their people. It is evident that the Preamble of the United States Constitution was hypocritical in 1787 because of the narrow vision of “the People,” because of the economic divide, and because of the issues plaguing their justice system, all proving that the promises written in the Preamble went unfulfilled in the year it was made. Foremost, the Constitution’s definition of “We the People” did not extend to all in its land, challenging the possibility of forming a more perfect union when the people in this union were treated unequally. For example, the circumstances of the African Americans did not reflect these ideals truly, as they are referred to as “such Persons” in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 1 of the Constitution: People.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil War-Causes.

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In 1782 Americans won their independence from Britain in the American Revolution. After the colonies won their independence, Americans created the Constitution. Its purpose was to replace the Articles of Confederation and solve its problems and more importantly to bring the states together under a single document creating a stronger union of all the states. There was one problem though: there were a few fundamental issues that the framers could not agree on. These issues included slavery and state vs. federal power. Since the framers could not agree they compromised, leaving these issues unresolved. The Union was formed with the Constitution, which was supposed to unite the states but instead embodied its major divisions. With conflicting ideas about the provisions in the Constitution related to the issues of slavery and the power of states' governments vs. the national government the union split into rivaling sections ultimately leading to the Civil War.…

    • 2106 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Articles of Confederation, formally known as the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, refers to an agreement between the thirteen founding states that first formed the United States of America as a confederation of sovereign states. The Articles of Confederation had served as the first U.S. constitution (Merrill, 1959). The states under the confederation were Virginia, South Carolina, New York, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Georgia, Rhode Island, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Delaware and Maryland. In 1787, a constitutional convention was called to revise the Articles of Confederation as they contained so many flaws, which would have fatally affected the confederation (Wendel, 1981). However, the convention ended up abandoning the Articles and drafted a new constitution which had a much stronger national government. After so much tussle and debating, eleven of the thirteen states ratified the constitution which led to the formation of a new form of government for the United States of America (Kermit, 1987). The following are similarities and differences of the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution.…

    • 1806 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Articles of Confederation

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The articles of confederation were introduced in 1777 and this gave the power to individual states. During 1781-1789 the Aricles of Confederation provided the United states with an ineffective movement, however there were some strong steps taken in the articles to try and make the United States a better country. The people of each state were given equal privileges and rights, freedom of movement was guaranteed, and procedures for the trails of accused criminals were outlined. The Articles of Confederation arranged a national government that would consist of a single house of congress, where each state would have one vote. One of the weaknesses was that the Congress could legislate only for states, not for individuals; because of this it could not enforce legislation. The problem of the Articles of Confederation was that limited the power to central government. This meant that the congress had no power to tax. Instead, it was to assess its expenses and divide those amounts the states on the basis of the value of land. States were then to tax their own citizens to raise the month for these expenses and turn the proceeds over to Congress. The states where not forced to do so, and in practice they rarely m…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “When it came to levying taxes the Articles stated Congress could request states to pay taxes. The Constitution states Congress has the right to levy taxes on individuals” (Feldmeth, Greg D. "U.S. History Resources" http://home.earthlink.net/~gfeldmeth/USHistory.html (31 March 1998). “A federal court the Articles states no system of federal courts. With the Constitution a court system created to deal with issues between citizens and states.”(Feldmeth, Greg D. "U.S. History Resources" http://home.earthlink.net/~gfeldmeth/USHistory.html (31 March 1998). With regulation of trade, the Articles states no terms to regulate interstate trade. The Constitution states Congress has the authority to control trade between states. When it come to the executive branch the Articles states no executive has power, the president just presides over the Congress. According to the Constitution, the executive branch leaded by the president who chooses the Cabinet and has checks on the powers of the other branches. For amending documents, the Articles stated 13/13 of the colonies were needed to pass Articles. Whereas for the Constitution, 2/3 of both houses of Congress plus ¾ of the states or national convention. Representation of states for the Articles stated each state had 1 vote no matter what size the states were. In the Constitution, Senate has two votes and the House is based on the population of the state. When raising an army the Article states congress could not draft citizens, it was if the states wanted to help. In the Constitution, Congress can…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But one thing was certain, something had to be changed. THe Articles of Confederation had a lot of weaknesses that introduced a great deal of interstate conflict, something that delegates, through the drafting of the Constitution, tried their best to solve. However, under the Articles, when the Founding Fathers signed the Constitution in 1787, it needed the ratification from nine states before it could go into effect. This was not easy. And the push for ratification brought on a seemingly endless barrage of documents, articles, and pamphlets both supporting and opposing it. There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not. One of the major issues these two parties debated concerned the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays