Utilitarian ethics is an expansive field of normative ethics that believes that the action that you take should be that which maximises utility, that is to say prospering and maximizing happiness whilst mitigating suffering or sadness as much as possible. Whilst it was once often considered a hedonistic field, there being one that argues pleasure being the only true, intrinsic good or aim, it is now more commonly referred to that of a consequentiality field, focussed more on consequentialism. It may be argued then that there is quite a difference between the seemingly 'old Utilitarianism' and that of the new consequentialism.
Modern utilitarianists have adapted the theory that you should make the greater number of people happier instead of discarding it which happened to many other theories. Jeremy Bentham is one of the more notable people to adapt utilitarianism as he had an empirical observation of happiness is the equivalent to pleasure and the absence of pain as people desire please and seek to avoid pain. He also thought that we should carefully measure any possible outcomes or consequences of an action before we decide on the choice we will make. His adaptation of the theory also changed many laws because it was thought to be to correct to consider the consequences. Bentham also created the Hedonic calculus which was helpful in determining measurements of pleasure, which can be used with the utiltitarian theory.
There are 2 main types of utilitarianism, the first I will talk about is Rule. Rule utilitarianism has certain principles involved with it, and from these, certain actions that we commit are able to be deemed as unacceptable. The principle of utility is therefore applied to a rule so the rule will stay if it leads to greater happiness for more people. This therefore means that if you do something bad that may lead to many people being happy, it could go against a rule or principle that has been set down in Rule utilitarianism which could lead to misery or a reduction in happiness in another case, which would be deemed wrong. John Stuart Mill may be seen as a rule utilitarian as he thinks that certain rules have utilitarian justification.
The other type of utilitarianism is Act. Act utilitarianism is when you look at an action to determine what is moral in the situation, and from this, general rules can be derived. For example, if there has been a car crash, when a paramedic arrives on the scene, if there is a pregnant woman, the paramedic would treat her first if he follows act utilitarianism. This is because the pregnant woman has a higher potential of having a happier future than an individual in the crash because the idea is to do the greater thing for the greater number of people. There are many criticisms of Act utilitarianism because there are many calculations required to make the theory successful but Bentham thought that you could repeat a decision if there are similar circumstances.
In conclusion, Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes utility, specifically defined as maximizing happiness and reducing suffering. There are many different views on the two main forms of Utilitarianism and they both have big strengths and weaknesses which can affect people's opinions on these theories. People such as John Stuart Mill claimed to have proof of utilitarianism being the correct theory we should follow, but Jeremy Bentham had evidence to prove Mill wrong and change our opinion on utilitarianism as it is not just a single theory, but a large cluster which can be changed with his Hedonic Calculus.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Utilitarian ethical theories are based on one’s ability to expect the concerns of an deed. Utilitarianism’s creed is that the result of any action takes importance over any type of means, this means that Utilitarianisms objective is to help as many individuals as possible even if it were to negatively disturb people along the way so as long as it helped the general populace. Basically, it’s the ends that matter not necessarily the means.…
- 629 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes overall happiness. Utilitarianism can be characterized as a quantitative and reductionist approach to ethics. It can be contrasted with deontological ethics which does not regard the consequences of an act as a determinant of its moral worth.…
- 447 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism revolves around the concept of “the end justifies the means.” It believes that outcomes as a result of an action have a greater value compared to the latter, the morally right action is the action that produces the most good. It also states that the most ethical thing to do is to take advantage of happiness for the good of the society. This normative theory considers the overall good for all people and not just a single person.…
- 517 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism = an ethical philosophy that says the most ethical decision or course of action is the one that maximize utility.…
- 790 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism is the ethical theory behind justifying an action for being for the greater good. This is a teleological theory because it looks at the consequences of an action. Utilitarianism is a consequentialist theory. There are three types of utilitarianism: Act, Rule and Preference. Jeremy Bentham began the Utilitarianism theory. Utilitarianism is a hedonistic theory because it is based on pleasure and happiness. Each utilitarian has a different theory of Utilitarianism and this will be explained in my essay.…
- 961 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The theory of Utilitarianism was first developed by Jeremy Bentham who was a philosopher of the 18th century. Bentham developed this theory to create a modern and rational approach to morality which would suit the changing society.…
- 489 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism is an ethical philosophy which seeks to maximize well-being for the largest amount of people. This means that if you can secure pleasure at no moral cost, you should do so. It also means that if you can prevent displeasure for others without sacrificing anything of equal moral value, you should. In Utilitarianism the key is the well-being for the entire population.…
- 443 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
First, utilitarianism allows for the good of all. Mills wrote, "Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness." Because morality is based on the greatest pleasure the more people who benefit from an act, the more…
- 1086 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Classical Utilitarianism is a moral philosophy, which was developed in 19th century England by Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill and Henry Sidgwick. The essential feature a utilitarian reside in, is the notion that an action is right if it produces the most amount of happiness well limiting suffering. Utilitarianism focuses solely on the consequences of the action, in an attempt to bring about the most happiness from each situation, well ensuring everybody’s happiness is equally considered.…
- 996 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism is a relativist, consequentialist and teleological system of ethics based on the idea of ‘utility’. This means usefulness and utilitarian suggest that everyone should be the most useful thing. The theory was devised by Jeremy Bentham who said “an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number”. He believed human beings are motivated by pleasure and pain.…
- 972 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarian ethics is the theory that the starting point of ethics is the principal that everyone, humans and creatures alike, want to enjoy pleasures and avoid suffering. Starting from this principal ethics becomes a calculation of how to balance the greatest pleasure over suffering. (Waller, 2008, p. 50) According to utilitarian John Stuart Mill, “Actions are right as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce pain or the reverse of happiness.” (Defining Utilitarianism) Jeremy Bentham's Hedonic Calculus of utilitarian ethics states that we should always try to perform that act that leads to the greatest pleasure. “This raises the question as to how we are to quantify pleasure; if we cannot put a value on the quantity of pleasure that an act…
- 2840 Words
- 12 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Due to the many ethical issues surrounding free samples of medications, they should not be prescribed to the uninsured or underinsured. The basic principle underlying utilitarianism ethics is an action is right or moral if it maximizes utility or happiness. Very simply, happiness can be explained as an absence of pain. The patient in this scenario receiving the free drug sample will not only be upset about the quality of care but also of the quality of medicine he or she is receiving. Moreover, no pharmacist is used in order to examine the patients past medical history, pinpoint certain allergies or drug interactions with the current medications the patients is using (Chimonas 2009). Also, the packaging of samples usually lacks proper labeling, leaving out the expiration date, possibly resulting in the patient to become significantly sick, hence, decreasing…
- 347 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The utilitarian makes decisions based off of maximizing happiness and well-being of individuals and society above all else. In theory, maximizing happiness and well-being seem favorable, but it is actually not. There are many who find utility to be synonymous to economics, but they are mistaken due to different definitions of the word. There is an ethical dilemma within utilitarianism because it leads ethical decisions to be made through utility calculations. This calculation differs between people and groups making morality subjective within this framework.…
- 1720 Words
- 7 Pages
Good Essays -
Utilitarianism is the view that an act is right if it equals the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarians describe moral actions as actions that boost something good and lessen something that is bad. Virtue, knowledge, and goodwill are all good but they are only good if they give people a pleasurable existence. Pain is the only thing that is intrinsically bad. Utilitarians focus on the result of an act instead of the inherent nature of the act. An example would be an individual throwing their garbage into the ocean. Utilitarians would say throwing garbage into the ocean is not necessarily bad, but the effect it leaves will cause harm sooner or later and that is what is bad. I do not think that utilitarianism can be an ethical theory. It is simply too difficult to determine whether the utilitarian theory can be justified. The dilemma of trying to focus on a positive outcome or focusing on the actions that we take in order to accomplish the greatest good is too hard to measure.…
- 1415 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Utilitarianism is what we should consider both short- and long-term consequences when we make some ethical choices. The goal of Utilitarianism is to expand profits as possible as they can. In other words, it is a way that trying to do the greatest good for the greatest number. Then, by depending on only on results, Utilitarianism seems to prove that the ends illustrate the process. Although in the modern society there are some certain principles in our mind, such as justice, honest, integrity---that should never be against.…
- 621 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays