Preview

Explain Why Richard III Faced Rebellion In 1483

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
644 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why Richard III Faced Rebellion In 1483
Explain why Richard III faced rebellion in 1483 (12 Marks)
Shortly after Richard III usurped the throne he faced a series of rebellions, the majority of which coming from the south of England. Many people call these rebellions after the Duke of Buckingham but in fact most of the rebellions took place before he switched sides and he himself on backed a few of the rebellions. In these rebellions (Kent, Sussex and Surrey being the biggest ones) Richard needed to rely on his loyal over mighty Lords to crush the rebellions and bring stability back to his reign as King of England.

Richard had been rumoured to of done many terrible atrocities while trying to usurp the throne, and the majority of these crimes were over watched by the Duke of Buckingham who encourage Richard to seize the throne to benefit his wealth and power. This leads to the conversation between Buckingham and John Morton (a prisoner in Brecknock castle) where Morton persuaded Buckingham of the fact that Richard was an infanticide and regicide. The fact that Morton showed him the other side of Richard and the potential of more wealth and power, which was not going to be granted to him by Richard, taunted Buckingham and ultimately made him join the other side.

Historians are not sure whether Buckingham wanted the throne for himself as he had a claim to the throne himself, or in fact he saw himself as a Kingmaker and wanted to bring over Henry Tudor who was in exile in France to become King, as he considered Henry as easy to manipulate which in Buckingham’s mind meant he could get whatever he wanted. Buckingham preferred to back Henry rather than Richard, because he would not gain any more land or power under Richard’s reign, as he was very strong and experienced and didn’t want too many over mighty lords.

Richard was not aware of the fact that Buckingham was not 100% loyal, and because of this Richard made the mistake of setting Buckingham in charge of stopping the rebellions in the south, and because

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    It is suggested that the Duke of Gloucester did have his sights set on seizing the throne from the moment his brother died because Richard hated the Woodvilles and their influence over Edward V, He would do anything to stop them having control over his country. He believes they have no rights to his brothers role and it is said that he ‘ feared the Woodvilles threatened political exclusion and ruin’ as well as threatening Edward V’s ability to rule.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On 22nd August 1485, King Richard III lost the Battle of Bosworth to Henry Tudor. One of the main reasons for him losing was due to his unpopularity with the people and his nobles. Richard was disliked by many of his nobles because he gave power to nobles from the north, which he knew, annoying the nobility in the south of England. This meant that in the battle he had little support, and some of his nobles, such as the Stanley’s fought for Henry. Richard was also disliked by the people of England. He seized the crown in 1483, and rumours spread that he killed his two nephews. This made him disliked, and few people supported him.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Tudor governments can be considered to have dealt poorly with rebellion on account of repeated noble support for rebellions throughout the period. The support of the nobility was crucial to maintaining control of the localities and additionally, noble support of a rebellion could increase the risk of a rebellion overthrowing the monarch. This was due to the likely contribution of funds to bolster supplies and troops with the involvement of retainers and experienced foreign mercenaries. Lack of noble co-operation with the government could also increase the threat of rebellion. This can be seen in the Cornish rebellion of…

    • 2557 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard tried to end the war of the roses and placate the Lancastrians by honouring Henry VI through a ceremonious reburial, and by trying to build bridges with the Woodvilles by persuading Elizabeth out of protective sanctuary and to attend court whilst paying her an annuity (Elizabeth was born into a Lancastrian family and did marry a minor Lancastrian noble before marrying the Yorkist king). He tried to end the war of the roses because they were unpopular with the kingdom and the nobles. This is a clear demonstration of how he could have been a great king. This is because he is trying to win over defected supporters and gain trust, popularity and an affinity with as many people as possible. It also shows how he tried to gain affinity with the nobility by gaining trust and showing respect to the Lancastrian history.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wrong Deeds of King John

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In 1191, Richard left England to embark on the Third Crusade. He left John in charge of the country. John's reputation as a leader had been severely dented as far back as 1185 when Henry II sent him to Ireland to rule. John proved to be a disaster and within six months he was sent home.…

    • 672 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Battle of bosworth

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moreover Tudor had a very strong tactical setup going into the war, the vanguard, under the control of the Earl of oxford, was strengthened by the mercenaries of Philibert de Chandee, Sir Gilbert Talbot commanded the right wing and john savage on the left wing. However, the most important part of their strategy was the Stanley’s. The Stanley’s had been pushing towards the side of Richard due to the capture of Lord Strange, However during the time leading up to the battle negotiations and meetings between Tudor and the Stanley’s were building and Richard started to question whether he could trust them. Tudor began to gain more and more support as he travelled through wales and the key sign of allegiance to Tudor was when the Stanley family advised the bailiffs of Shrewsbury to open the town gates to let them in. So, the Stanley’s did not actively fight at the beginning of the battle but their betrayal soon became apparent when they attacked Richard near the conclusion of the battle. Other higher powers that Richard thought he would have the support of also backed out, for example Northumberland decided to not take part in the battle at all.…

    • 700 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Explain why there were fewer rebellions in England during Elizabeth’s reign than in the years between 1485 and 1558…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The rebellions which occurred during the reigns of Edward vi and mary 1st were mainly political in origin?…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An important factor to consider when assessing how threatening a rebellion was during Henry VII’s reign is issues of location and the size of the rebellion. During Henry VII’s reign, only rebellions in close proximity of London would be posed as threatening as London would’ve been Henry and any other monarch’s central location and biggest area of threat. Rebellions far from the centre would cause minimal disturbances to government and consequently only cause limited threat. In Henry VII’s reign, rebellions occurred in Yorkshire, Cornwall and Ireland (mostly in the North), however it could be argued that Perkin Warbeck’s rebellion was more of a threat than others as it managed to reach Hampshire, which whilst is still not placed centrally, is closer to the monarch and therefore more threatening. Following on from this, the size of a rebellion is crucial to determine how far the majority supported it and if so, how easily it would be to remove. The largest of the rebellions was the Cornish uprising of 1497, an army of 15,000 made their way to London from Cornwall facing little resistance along the way until they reached London where there weak force was faced with Henry’s…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the War of the Roses, England was constantly in a state of war between the House of Lancaster and the House of York, who were massive rivals that competed for the throne of England (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). In Polydore Vergil’s account of Henry VII, Richard III’s personal ambition can be seen. The author first tells of a nightmare Richard has the night before Bosworth Field, which Vergil believes was “no dream but a conscience guilty of heinous offences, a conscience, I say” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII, 479). Though the source makes no explicit mentions of it, it is widely believed that Richard III murdered his nephews to take the throne. When his brother, Edward IV died, his legitimate son was crowned Edward V, but was shortly taken captive by his uncle and placed into the Tower of London (History 320 Lecture, 10/30/2015). Instead of allowing for a legitimate heir to take the throne as it should have gone, Richard went to immeasurable lengths to ensure he would be king, further escalating the conflict and disrupting English society as a whole. This caused not only great scandal, but Richard III was a terrible king, guilty of many offenses as Vergil states. He created great disruption not only in his court by taking the throne away from his nephew, but also to the lives of his subjects. Vergil makes note of this as well, specifically mentioning the strife of the English people, who had consistently been “torn by rival factions” (Polydore Vergil, Account of Henry VII,…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    He wanted to become as powerful as possible despite the competition he had. So when his oldest brother passed, Richard was the last one standing. The only living male sibling of the king, so the courts had no other choice but to anoint Richard as the next king. It was a dream come true for Richard, and it couldn’t have gone any more smoothly. However, what’s the point of having power if you won’t keep it? The boys were still young, so they weren’t an immediate threat to Richard, but perhaps the thrill of it all and knowing the fact they could succeed him in the future lead him to ambitiously kill off his remaining competition. It would have been no burden on his shoulders anyway, since Richard saw them only as the worst parts of his favorite…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard Iii

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Shakespeare also gives great insight on Richard’s mind via diction. In Richard’s opening lines he specifically says, “Our dreadful marches to delightful measures” (1,1,8). Instead of fighting the Lancasters Richard (and his family) are in a time of harmony. He intentionally changes the negative word to a positive. Lines like these are all throughout the opening soliloquy. Richard allows the audience to see that he is at peace, that he is relaxed. By his big soliloquy in Act 5, Richard’s attitude is down. He’s worried about all the deeds he’s done. He directly states, “Is there a murderer here? No. Yes, I am:” (5,3,211). Not only does he leave the negative word of “murderer” in the sentence, but he…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Richard 3rd Comparison

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Hastings speeches compared show Hastings realizations that of Richards plan. In lines 48-52, Hastings believes he can read Richard like a book, as he is in a good mood, he says “I think there’s never a man in Christendom Can lesser hide his love or hate than he, For by his face straight shall you know his heart”. By this we see that Hastings is in belief that him and Richard are great friends, and that nothing is ‘on his mind’. By lines 95-100, Hastings has been ordered to be beheaded by Richard as he believes him to be a traitor. As Hastings is about to be gone, he realizes what terrible times England is in for with Richard being a leader.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Dryden

    • 2309 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Buckingham took an active part in prosecuting those implicated in the Popish Plot, and accused the lord chief justice of favouring the Roman Catholics. A writ was issued for Buckingham’s arrest, but it was never served. He promoted the return of Whig candidates to Parliament and constituted himself the champion of the dissenters. Buckingham, however, separated himself from the Whigs on the exclusion question, probably on account of his dislike of the Duke of Monmouth (Absalom) and the Earl of Shaftesbury. He was, however, later restored to the king’s favour.…

    • 2309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays