Preview

Explain Why Some People Should Not Serve Two Years

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
308 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why Some People Should Not Serve Two Years
I believe everyone should not serve two years in the military because people should make their own discussion , they will miss their family, and many people will not know what to do and get killed. This is not a so good idea what happens if everybody want to do something else with their life instead of the army. We should support other people discussion . This my opinion of this problem.
People should be able to make their own discussion. Make they own choice. So if they want to be a doctor let them get that choice. People got different point of views of this problem. Well my point of view is that I think that serving that two years is a lil too much. Maybe the person go something else in their mind when school over.
They might miss their


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Instead of pressuring students to complete a certain course, schools should support students in the decisions they want to make. In the article Why I'm telling my students not to go to college, Gordon, a student teacher in agricultural education at Ridgemont Public schools in Ridgeway, Ohio says, “we know that it may not be the best choice for them, we are cheating them of reality and a worthy, challenging education simply because they are the textbook version of a ‘good student’ (Gordon). A sufficient grasp of history, literature and philosophy is the most important things needed in order for one to understand the time and place that they are present in. The freedom to choose for oneself is the most valuable thing a parent, society, and teachers can give a student. There is nothing wrong with taking time off after high school or going to a community college.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I do not agree with the reinstitution of a military draft. In 1973 the military draft was lifted in the United States and with good reason. The United States should not rely on a draft to fill military vacancies but rely on recruitment. It is true that the military offers incentives and luxuries that some civilians could not afford otherwise such as food, shelter, and medical care. However, they are just that, incentives. The military is an option and should remain that way. Many enlist for different reasons, some with economical reasons, others with strong political urges, but they enlist out of their own desires, beliefs, and more importantly, free will. Some see the military as a way of life; others see it as the only way to educate themselves in a society where education is valued so highly. With rising tuition costs, many enlist in the reserves as a guarantee for their degree. College is costly and even with the aid of tuition assistance and can leave a graduate drowning in debt. These are all choices all college bound 18-25 year olds make and some just do not have the luxury of choosing.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Do you think we need a military draft? I think that we do not need a military draft. There are no good reasons why we should possibly throw are life away when we don't want to. There are many good reasons against a military draft as you will read later, but first I will explain what a military draft is in case you don't know. A military draft is a way to fill in the areas where volunteering doesn't fill and when you get a license you have a number that goes with you and during a draft there will be random numbers chosen and if your number is called then you will have to serve in the military, but for only for one term unless you want to stay longer.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The U.S. Department of Justice defines robbery more elaborately as, the taking or attempting to take anything of value from the care, custody, or control of a person or persons by force, threat, violence or by putting the victim in fear. Armed robbery is also known as a heist, stickup, holdup or larceny by threat of violence (Farlex, 2007). Although gun control is an issue in this case, the topic of gun control is broad and would not focus enough on this aspect to create a heavy impact on the criminal statistics regarding armed robbery. Furthermore, because of the second amendment and the right to bear arms, there may be excessive issues related with the gun control that would assist in prevention of armed robberies. This paper will also focus on the philosophy that those who commit crimes over time are likely to escalate the offenses in severity of the crime (Conway & McCord, 2006). In response, legislation should include larger and more climatic punishments and treatments for repeat…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    As a Criminologist Advisor to the State Legislature, I have been chosen to provide a prison term policy on armed robbery. Currently the legislature will soon be voting on a bill that would double the maximum prison term for anyone convicted of armed robbery. First I would like to define what the legal definition of armed robbery is as defined by the Black's Law Dictionary which is: an aggravated form of robbery in which the defendant is armed with a dangerous weapon, though it is not necessary to prove that he used the weapon to effectuate the robbery. The taking of property from person or presence of another by use of force or by threatening use of force while armed with a dangerous weapon (Black's Law Dictionary, 6th Edition).…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every situation in life is unique and has its own set of circumstances. Crime is no different, which is why it often difficult to effectively use policies like mandatory minimum sentences, because not every crime is the same. It is acceptable for their to be some disparity in sentencing for similar crimes, but there still needs to be some consistency. The initiation of mandatory minimum sentences was due in large part to the fact that judges had too much discretion and it led to many similar cases having wildly different sentences.1 There was sound reasoning for enacting mandatory minimum sentences, but they “are the product of good intentions, but good intentions do not always make good policy; good results are also necessary.”1 Mandatory…

    • 1908 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sentencing: For committing crimes such as: Vandalism, Trespass and Street Drinking you’ll be given an ASBO (Anti-social behaviour order) that lasts for 2 years (although it could be shortened if the offender behaves in a proper way E.g. not committing anymore anti social acts). Anyone over the age of 10 can be given an ASBO.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are many different argument both for and against mandatory minimum drug sentencing. However there are more arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing then there are for the support of the mandatory sentencing. One of the biggest arguments against mandatory minimum drug sentencing is that it was originally intended to target the higher level drug dealers but the majority of the cases have only been low level drug dealers. One of the other arguments is that will cause the jail systems to become overcrowded and that if is unfair.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everyone has the right to a second chance , a chance to make changes , a chance to learn from every mistake that is or was made. In article “Juveniles Don't deserve life sentences” by Gail Garinger postulates , “An overwhelming majority of young offenders grow out of crime.”. Most of the juveniles that make heinous as they grow up, they grow out of the mentality that they had once the crime was committed. Why not give them a chance to show that they have mature and that there mentality isn't the same?. Also Gail Garinger believes that “...it is impossible at that time of sentencing for mental health professionals to predict which youngster will fall within that majority and grow up to be productive, law-abiding citizens and which will…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In summary if people such as Sable were given fair sentencings for their crimes less people could be in jail which would save state tax dollars to be put into schools and hospitals. People get extreme sentencings for the crimes they commit which are not deserving of them, more people should get the chance to be put on parole and show that they can positively contribute to their community. It is important to help people create a better life for themselves if they are willing to work and commit themselves to it. When someone fails at something they need to be picked up and given a second chance to show they can do better just as many prisoners need. The Prison-Industrial Complex System receives millions of citizens’ tax dollars to…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The four fundamental philosophies surrounding the purpose of sentencing are retribution, deterrence, Incapacitation, and Rehabilitation. Retribution is the belief that those who commit criminal acts should be punished according to the seriousness of the crime and that no other circumstances are considered. It relies on the principle of just deserts, which holds that the severity of the punishment must be in proportion of the severity of the crime. Deterrence is the thought that if the punishment given is severe enough that it will stop the potential criminal from committing the crime or to be a repeat offender, so rather than seeking only to punish the offender this strategy is to try to sentence to prevent future crimes along with incapacitation and rehabilitation. Incapacitation is the third philosophy that is a belief that if the criminal is detained for a crime, thereby being separated from the community reduces the criminal activity and once released will not be as likely to be a repeat offender. Rehabilitation is the fourth and final philosophy that surrounds the purpose of sentencing, some believe that society is best served when those who break the law are not simply punished but are provided with resources needed to eliminate the need or want to engage in criminal behavior activity. There are three steps to help determining sentencing. When public opinions move toward more severe strategies of retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation, legislatures have responded by asserting their power of over determining sentencing guidelines. The Legislature passes sentencing Laws; this specifies the terms of indeterminate sentencing. An Indeterminate term of incarceration is in which a judge determines the minimum and maximum terms of imprisonment. Only a jury can hand down the decision of the death penalty. When the minimum term is reached the prisoner becomes eligible to be paroled. Then there is determinate sentencing, this is a period of incarceration that is…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Personally I don’t believe that the U.S. should make citizens serve in the military. I believe this because people should be able to choose what they want to do in life and what they want to study and what they want to make of themselves. Often people don’t even have the physical strength or abilities to join the military, or the mental state to serve. Yes, I know that our country needs protection but we need other things too.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Envision one of your family members that may be younger or a more youthful cousin of yours, inquisitive and cheerful, not having a care on the planet. Picture this in your mind, picture there generally content smile exchanged with a currently secured look of fright and a gloom. At one point in their life they were free yet now they are wearing shackles around their arms and their legs, shackles that are obviously and painfully not meant for them, shackles that are more fitting for an adult. Envision if the last time you saw your young family member, you saw them getting escorted into a major metal confine and as you look, the entryway pummels right in their little faces.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Criminal sentencing in America has long been guided by one of several different major philosophies of punishment, including retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, and rehabilitation (Spohn, 2000). Retributive sentences involve punishments intended to exact revenge, in line with the biblical idea of “an eye for an eye.” This is based on the belief that some behaviors are unconditionally wrong and therefore justified of punishment. From this perspective, sentences should be equal with the harm done to society. Deterrence, on the other hand, involves a more practical basis for sentencing. It is based on the concept that crime is easily chosen as the result of a rational cost-benefit examination. Individuals will engage in crime when the benefits…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A tradeoff for option one, the termination of mandatory sentencing for minor offenses, convey a problematic idea. Giving these minor wrongdoers the inappropriate perception by committing a minor misconduct there won't be any aftermath. As concurred by Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr. (2014), “they argue that mandatory minimum sentences reflect a societal judgment that certain offenses demand a specified minimum sanction and thereby ensure that anyone who commits such a crime cannot avoid a just punishment”. Secondly elimination of mandatory sentencing rejects the idea of sentencing disparity, as agreed by Evan Bernick and Paul J. Larkin, Jr. (2014), “mandatory minimum…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays