Preview

Explain Why The Order No. 1 Was Distributed By The Provisional Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
407 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Explain Why The Order No. 1 Was Distributed By The Provisional Government
The Order No.1 was distributed by the provisional government, who had yet gathered up mind to act like a government, to regulate the garrison of the Petrograd District. Saying that the provisional government was not ready to be a government was because, from Rodzianko’s version, the order was demanded by the frontier. The Order No.1 revealed a trace that the soviet was gradually gaining power legally as this was “enforced as law”.
Lower ranks were acquiring power! This power was not merely as a power which might be able to pull more votes in the council, but a power which owned guns. Although it was stated that “the military branch is subordinated to the Soviet of Workers’ and Soldiers’ Deputies and to its own committees”, latter half of this

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The anarchy in Petrograd was finally brought to the attention of Nicholas, but only a limited amount because the reports were censored. It was not until he tried to return to Petrograd that he realized how many strikes there were and how critical they were to Russia. This was just like the Tsar’s…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While I have been arguing that Ulysses S. Grant is undeserving of much of the criticism he has received, the man is not without flaws. Three clouds hovered over Grant’s reputation. The occasional bender, his highly trusted yet unscrupulous friends and family, and Order No. 11. Each of these cast a shadow on the man and his legacy, but in each you may find a little light as well.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lenin and Trotsky had created the Red Soviet Army from the Red Guard, a bolshevik…

    • 877 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Draft ESSAY

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages

    An aspect of the Soviet Union that changed between 1801 and 1939 was the shift of the government from a czar ruled totalitarian government to a more distributed communist government. In March of 1801, Paul I was killed and his son Alexander I of Russia was appointed the ruler. Czar Alexander I was not too harsh of a leader. He led a government that was not too strict upon its people unlike his father. But this changed when the next czar came into power, Nicholas I in 1825. Anybody who was leading or supporting the Decembrist Revolt was executed. Nicholas I undid everything that Alexander I did. He censored media, ran secret police, and exiled 150,000 people. Alexander II was the next one in power who was extremely different from Nicholas I. He freed the serfs but did not let them leave. But he did allot power to the people by creating local councils called Zemstvos to give them control of their land and women the right to vote. Alexander III went back into a strict totalitarian government, censoring media and deploying secret police. Alexander III also wanted all Russian minorities to speak Russian and convert to Russian Orthodox. Russian Jews were specifically targeted; they had to live in ghettos and eventually many Jews fled to the United States. The last of the czars in this time period, Nicholas II, came into power in 1894. A decade after his appointment, over three thousand workers grouped outside the czar’s palace asking for reforms. The czar was not home, but he still did not approve the order to fire at the protestors. In order to bring back his name, he enabled a national assembly called Duma that would allow the people of Russia to elect. As one of his reforms, he gave more land to…

    • 1114 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan The Terrible Legacy

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The creation of the Oprichnina marked something completely new, a break from the past that served to diminish the power of the boyars and create a more centralized government. "...the revolution of Tsar Ivan was an attempt to transform an absolutist political structure into a despotism... the Oprichnina proved to be not only the starting point, but also the nucleus of autocracy which determined... the entire subsequent historical process in Russia."[20] Ivan created a way to bypass the Mestnichestvo system and elevate the men among the gentry to positions of power, thus suppressing the aristocracy that failed to support him.[21] Part of this revolution included altering the structure of local governments to include, "a combination of centrally appointed and locally elected officials. Despite later modifications, this form of local administration proved to be functional and durable." [22] Ivan successfully cemented autocracy and a centralized government in Russia, in the process also establishing "a centralized apparatus of political control in the form of his own guard."[23] The idea of a guard as a means of political control became so ingrained in Russian history that it can be traced to Peter the Great, Vladimir Lenin, who "... [provided] Russian autocracy with its Communist incarnation",[24] and Joseph Stalin, who…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A major factor which led to the downfall of the provisional government was First World War. Russia had already lost territory in Poland and morale; this was predominantly down to low members within the army. Additionally Russia owed large amounts of money in foreign loans, and the British and French agreed to continue lending money as long as Russia continued fighting therefore also influencing the provisional government to continue with war. The agreement for Russia to continue fighting in the war brought the provisional government into conflict/disagreement with the Soviet for they believed the only way to bring Russia out of depression was to remove itself form the war. This meant that they would not support the continuation of the war for any other reason, for instance gaining land or money from their defeated opponents. This led the provisional government to plan an offensive on the Eastern Front in order to win support from home and abroad. The June offensive was introduced and made against the Austro-Hungarian army, the failure of the June offensive lead to mass numbers of Russian troops deserting from the front. This was a major collapse for the authority of the provisional government and resulted to July days which led to a series of riots and demonstrations in Petrograd (St…

    • 875 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The first of these was headed by a moderate liberal, Georgi Lvov and the second was ran by Alexander Krensky. The Provisional Government knew that the Bolsheviks were going to strike. The reports of the Bolshevik's conspiracy in where always in Krensky's mind, but there was overwhelming dissent about the revolution. The government was so unstable that Krensky had little to no control over the congress or military, and because Krensky did not have "the majesty of government, the laws, the protection of friends and of the state," he had no power, no control over his fortune. Krensky's failure as a prince had to do with the unstable government and the political factions all brewing their revolutions and civil unrest. He did not prepare for fortune. He met his end by not being able to deal with…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cheka And The Okhrana

    • 1273 Words
    • 4 Pages

    So as aforementioned, these oppressive measures of terror were put into place by the Tsar and Lenin to preserve their own leadership and their politics, whether it be autocracy or revolution. Serge described that “from now on the psychosis of absolute power was to captivate the great majority of power1” showing how the Cheka and the Red Terror were essential to “captivat[e]ing the great majority of power” to keep Lenin’s revolution stable and in his hands. Pipes also recognises this fact: “no Tsar, even at the height of radical terrorism…was as well protected as Lenin.”2 This furthers the idea of the Cheka being used as not only to “hunt out the political enemies of the state”3 which would ensure the continuation of the Bolshevik party and their power gains, but also as a direct protection of Lenin himself. Terror organisations before, such as the Okhrana, did have effects on internal political matters, but very rarely were directly given the task to guard the Tsar and his family. Shornikova was one of the many secret agents planted by the Okhrana into the Social Democratic Party and he stated: “…I knew all the secret meeting places and passwords of the revolutionary army cells throughout Russia… I was present at all the district meetings, propaganda rallies, and party conferences; I was always in the know. All the information I gathered was conscientiously reported to the Okhrana.4”…

    • 1273 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Russian people were ruled by an autocratic government since 1613 when the Romanov Dynasty began. The government was run by the Tsar who had unlimited power over the rest of Russia. The Tsar set up a system of government involving an imperial council, a small cabinet of ministers and a senate; all of which were implemented as personal advisers and delegates. The Tsar had control over who was appointed and dismissed, and no one challenged the power of the governmental system. To ensure the country operated effectively, a bureaucracy, merely consisting of the noble and upper classes put official policies into place. Many believed the bureaucrats were corrupt collecting bribes along with their wages. Practical measures were also needed to be taken in order to enforce Russian autocracy. While the police maintained law and order, the Tsars organised secret police called the Okhrana, for the surveillance of revolutionaries and anarchists while also censoring certain information and activities.…

    • 2229 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bolsheviks Primary Source

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In terms of content, the extract states that the Soviet Government enjoys support from the working class and the peasants and that victory of the Bolsheviks is just a matter of time. The second point tries to…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: Bernstein, Laurie, and Robert Weinberg. Revolutionary Russia: A History In Documents. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The largest factor in this public unrest was the Provisional Government’s insistence that Russia should continue fighting in the First World War. Millions of Russians had been killed, a large percentage of them ‘peasants in uniform’ – farmers who were untrained and unprepared for what awaited them. With so many farmers fighting or already dead, coupled with severe inflation due to lack of government control of the economy, huge food shortages swept across Russia.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Shakespeare, a world-renowned playwright, poet, and actor, has been known for centuries all around the world for his great variety of brilliant, poetic, and creative plays written during the Elizabethan Era. Shakespeare’s plays have the reputation of being among the greatest in the English language and Western literature, traditionally divided into the genres of tragedy, history, and comedy, and comprising of various imaginative settings, plots, characters, and conflicts. They have been translated into every major living language, in addition to being continually performed all around the world. Many of Shakespeare’s plays give insight on human nature, astonishingly able to characterize every emotion, strength, and weakness possessed by human beings during the Elizabethan Era and even today. The most famous and critically acclaimed of Shakespeare's plays has to be Romeo and Juliet, a romantic tragedy concerning the fate of two young "star-crossed lovers" (Prologue, l. 6). The play focuses on romantic love, specifically the intense passion that springs up at first sight between Romeo and Juliet and the deaths of the two characters because of their eternal love for each other. While there could be various reasons for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet, it is obvious that both the two households and significantly Old Capulet play the greatest roles in the tragedy due to their ancient family feud and Capulet’s overwhelming authority over his daughter, Juliet.…

    • 1460 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cosmetic Surgery

    • 2029 Words
    • 9 Pages

    With passing time, the urge to become beautiful is increasing in everyone’s life. Is the requirement just in our heads or is it truly needed. Does everyone have a right to be beautiful and look more attractive? Most of us would say yes. Everyone wants to be good-looking and pretty. Nowadays looks and appearances seem to be the basic requirement in every person and hold much more importance compared to a person’s abilities and inner self. This instinct is present in human beings since the start of the world. Allah the Almighty has created this universe and has described it a beautiful creation. Amongst all, He proclaims that human being has been created as the best of its creations. The proportioning of different body parts in a human body is in its ultimate shape and it therefore cannot be improved further. One wonders as to how many samples have Allah made in his factory that no one matches other perfectly. However sometimes someone feels dissatisfied with the shape or proportioning of any of its revealing parts particularly nose and due to its natural instinct to look the most beautiful wants to improve it to the best possible shape. What is Plastic surgery? It is the result of this instinct that compelled scientists and doctors to initiate work in this field and finally they devised various methods for this purpose, all collectively known as plastic surgery. Plastic surgery as what people think is a surgery that involves fake and artificial material injected to our body to improve or reconstruct a body part etc. But plastic surgery is basically defined as a type of surgery that both improves a person’s appearance as well as body functions. The word “Plastic” comes from a Greek word “plastikos” that means to be able to be moulded. The question here is whether plastic surgery actually makes your life better or just acts as a placebo. Today more than 10 million people go through the processes…

    • 2029 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays