Preview

Ivan The Terrible Legacy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
965 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ivan The Terrible Legacy
In the centuries following Ivan's death, historians developed different theories to better understand his reign, but independent of the perspective through which one chooses to approach this, it cannot be denied that Ivan the Terrible changed Russian history and continues to live on in popular imagination. His political legacy completely altered the Russian governmental structure; his economic policies ultimately contributed to the end of the Rurik Dynasty, and his social legacy lives on in unexpected places.

Arguably Ivan's most important legacy can be found in the political changes he enacted in Russia. In the words of historian Alexander Yanov, "Ivan the Terrible and the origins of the modern Russian political structure [are]... indissolubly
…show more content…
The creation of the Oprichnina marked something completely new, a break from the past that served to diminish the power of the boyars and create a more centralized government. "...the revolution of Tsar Ivan was an attempt to transform an absolutist political structure into a despotism... the Oprichnina proved to be not only the starting point, but also the nucleus of autocracy which determined... the entire subsequent historical process in Russia."[20] Ivan created a way to bypass the Mestnichestvo system and elevate the men among the gentry to positions of power, thus suppressing the aristocracy that failed to support him.[21] Part of this revolution included altering the structure of local governments to include, "a combination of centrally appointed and locally elected officials. Despite later modifications, this form of local administration proved to be functional and durable." [22] Ivan successfully cemented autocracy and a centralized government in Russia, in the process also establishing "a centralized apparatus of political control in the form of his own guard."[23] The idea of a guard as a means of political control became so ingrained in Russian history that it can be traced to Peter the Great, Vladimir Lenin, who "... [provided] Russian autocracy with its Communist incarnation",[24] and Joseph Stalin, who …show more content…
Ivan inherited a government in debt, and in an effort to raise more revenue instituted a series of taxes. "It was the military campaigns themselves... that were responsible for the increasing government expenses."[27] Under the new political system, the Oprichniki were given large estates, but unlike the previous landlords, could not be held accountable for their actions. These men, "took virtually all the peasants possessed, forcing them to pay 'in one year as much as [they] used to pay in ten.'"[28] This degree of oppression resulted in increasing cases of peasants fleeing which in turn led to a drop in the overall production. To make matters worse, successive wars drained the country both of men and resources. "Muscovy from its core, where its centralized political structures depended upon a dying dynasty, to its frontiers, where its villages stood depopulated and its fields lay fallow, was on the brink of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ivan the Great- Centralized rule; married the niece of the last Byzantine emperor which gave him the chance to asset dominance over all orthodox churches whether in Russia or not. He insisted that Russia had exceeded Byzantine as a third Rome. He called himself “csar” after the Caesar, the :the autocrat of all the Russians.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan the Terrible, grandson of Ivan The Great was crowned the 1st Tzar of Russia in 1547. Ivan The Terrible was known for his great intelligence yet impulsive outbreaks and rash decisions making throughout his long reign (1533-1584). When both of his parents died he was left to me raised by members of the nobility who often neglected and scorned him. This was said to have been a contribution to his mold into a ruthless individual.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV (or Ivan the Terrible) was the ruler of Russia from 1533-1584. Ivan IV is credited for creating an absolute monarchy in Russia. He gained Mongol land for Russia and expanded the Russian economy on a small scale. Although Ivan IV accomplished these goals for Russia, he does deserve his nickname, Ivan the Terrible. Ivan IV was a very intelligent man, but many people believed that he was mentally ill. This would explain his violent outbursts and his infamous behavior. His troubled childhood might be a possible explanation for his outburst issues.Both of his parents died before he was 8 years old. After his parents death he was faced with constant danger and neglect, which led to him hating the boyar class and torturing small animals as…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another factor that was responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule was the reluctance of the Peasantry to support opposition. The Peasants were extremely uneducated and they didn’t understand how these policies could change their lives. The Tsar had been the political power since the 13th century so it was all that they knew. They believed that the Tsar was appointed by god so whatever he did, they believed it was for the best. They were fearful that if they joined an opposition group the Tsar would be able to ‘see’ them and…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ivan IV, Tsar of Russia is better known as Ivan the terrible. In the following paragraphs I will depict major events in his life and the role he played in Russia. I will also exhibit the many positive things that he did. As well as the negative things that he did to Russian society during his reign…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    All state leaders across the whole period held qualities that didn’t please the whole of the population in Russia. During the reign of Alex II, the government showed some strength with controlling opposition from the peasantry through the emancipation of the serfs in 1861. It was thought that to prevent revolt from below, this was a key movement that had to be made, and therefore prevented future unrest and opposition. However, the new liberated serfs had to deal with more laws concerning land ownership with led to further unrest and repression in the peasantry by the state. The state moreover, appeased the most vocal critics but in such a way that allowed dissenters to express themselves in the knowledge that Tsar’s decision would be final. Compared to Nicholas II’s reign, this showed a decisive leading technique, as Nicholas’s style was more conservative, and showed weakness, relying on others’ advice to fuel his decisions. A key failure throughout his period was the mixed rule attempt with the Duma introduced from 1906 to 1917, it is arguable that Nicholas II made concessions only to keep opposition temporarily at bay and that his aim was to uphold the principle of autocracy.…

    • 1646 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | * The land given to the peasants was not of good quality, the peasants also had to pay the state long term installments. The peasants were also responsible to the village commune that forced them to pay their installments and not be free of the land. * The local assemblies couldn’t attain much because of the interruption of bureaucrats afraid that it would turn into a self –government. * Alexander’s reform policies led to increasing reform movements that led to a populist group assassinating him, making his son turn against any reform and go back to repression. His reform policies also set the foundation for the fall of Russia’s Monarchy in 1917.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His increasing need for resources caused him to suppress the peasants more and more under his reign. Not only were the peasants affected, but also the middle-class and the nobility, which lost most of their power under the growing absolutism of Peter the Great. In another words, Peter controlled the nobility with the army, the peasantry with the whip. Peasants fared the worst under Peter's reign though. Their taxes increased threefold under Peter's reign to pay for a growing military expenditure and almost had to work six days without pay. Serfs were arbitrarily assigned to work in factories in towns, breaking up the central Russian unit of the family. Like Louis the XIV of France by crushing the power of the nobility, and reducing peasants to serfs, Peter was able to make his government powerful and…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rasputin altered the course of a reigning family over an empire of three centuries. The amount Rasputin achieved and managed to change even past his murder was vastly amazing, he attained lots of significant power in a short amount of time during his period spent with the royal family History Learning Site. Grigori Rasputin became a central figure in modern Russian history up until the fall of the Romanov dynasty History Learning Site. When Rasputin entered the home of the Tsar and his family, he ultimately entered the home and lives of the entire country. By ‘miraculously’ saving the life of an ill Tsesarevich Alexei for a brief time in his short life, Rasputin took down the rest of his family and their rule…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not everything about Ivans reign was "terrible." The code of sudebnik equalized the power balance between peasants and nobles. The code also allowed the people to elect officials to determine the fate of trials. This concept will be part of the foundation of American justice. America has jurors decide the fate of the accused. The idea of jurors was derived from the sudebnik code. Ivan is also credited with the greatest expansion Russia has ever known. While he had little to no success in the west everywhere else his expansion was unstoppable. During these conquest Ivan established trade ways and roads to increase Russian wealth. a result of Ivans conquests was a diversity of ethnicity and religion. The increase in diversity offered a richer culture to Russians and increased the size and diversity of the Russians arts movements. While Ivan had great success he also had numerous follies. His greatest weakness was his anger and lust for death and torture. Ivan killed of much of the noble class. While the peasants may have seen this as a positive thing it was the nobles that ran much of the trading and economy under the tsar. While Ivan expanded the country, he ran his nation dry. Towards the end of his reign he had many troubles recruiting men for the army. He also almost bankrupted his nation with all the wars and conquest he sought. Ivan also had many issues with his reputation among the people. He was knowing to kill for minor offenses and slaughter thousands due to his own paranoia. Perhaps Ivans greatest folly was killing his rightful heir Ivan. In killing Ivan, he allowed his mentally incompetent son to rule the empire after his death bringing upon Russia a dark…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    At first, the riots of Moscow called for his attention in the year following his coronation as tsar and he made clear decisions with the help of his able advisors (Thompson, 2012, p.65). He eventually created the zemskii sobor which he relied on multiple times in the next few years for consultation on many important matters (Thompson, 2012, p.65). Another aspect of Tsar Ivan IV’s personality was that of his religious priority. Tsar Ivan IV strengthened the ties with the church and was devoted to ridding Russia of the sinful while “carrying out God’s will” (Thompson, 2012, p.63). However, the side of Tsar Ivan IV that was and is not widely discussed was that of his innate knowledge of leadership and control in Russia. He was clearly an able, intelligent leader who was troubled, but wanted to do right by his country and his men. After all, that is exactly what he thought he did, even with an unusual mental status. However, his rage continued to build up and his pathological personality dominated his decisions after his wife Anastasia died. Since Anastasia was said to have a rather calming influence on him, Tsar Ivan IV had to learn to live without his woman, and that changed his more subdued personality to an intense version (Thompson, 2012, p.65). It was also claimed that due to an illness, rumored to be encephalitis, his personality problem intensified because the disease can cause a character…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thanks to Michael I, Russia was brought back from the brink of collapse. He allowed the country to recover from a very destructive time. He steadied the shaky balance in his dominion and allowed the land to prosper. The Romanov dynasty also gained an influential place in the history of Russia and it all began with the reluctant 16 year old Mikhail…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Tsarist Autocracy

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Tsarist autocracy has succeeded for more than three hundred years, but the Russian Revolution that occurred on November 1917 ended the long term autocracy. During this time period, Tsar Nicholas II was the leader of Russia and indeed the last one. He caused Russia’s downfall and made many Russians frustrated about the government. The Tsar did not acknowledge the nation's problems and failed to improve the lives of the citizens. As the Russians struggled with limited rights and lack of help from Nicholas II, they had to make a move. Although peasant unrest led to the Russians protesting and rebelling against the country, the Russian Revolution occurred because of Tsar Nicholas II’s weak leadership, in which he failed to accomplished the Russian’s goals, horribly managed the military, and thought that the system should not change.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many people do not realize what affects the Romanov family had on Russia, and what an important role they played for its future. The romanov family is an intriguing topic for many different reasons such as when Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov ( Nicholas II) was a child, to the time he started his family, his ruling as Tsar, and the day his family was massacred. Nicholas II and his father, Alexander Alexandrovich Romanov (Alexander III), had differences, but agreed only on one subject; Nikolay Alexandrovich Romanov was not fit to rule Russia. Alexander III was “brutish despot” who ruled the people of Russia with Aristocracy. Alexander III saw his son as not worthy of the throne (Atchison).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Russian Revolution was one of the most important revolutions in history. Just like the French people, Russians got tired of being treated unfairly by the Higher classes, and so decided to revolt against them. However unlike the French, they could not be satisfied, or entertained for long by a single revolution, reason why they did many revolts. Each time retreating at its middle, until they finally were annoyed and determined enough to overthrow the Government and change their lives as they knew it. Even so, that wasn’t the only cause of the Russian Revolution, along the many revolts came various relevant causes and events, but only few of them stood out, with such importance to today’s history of the causes for the Russian…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays