Eyewitness Testimony Essay

Overall eyewitness evidence strength was further examined across prosecution outcomes in the eyewitness identification alone cases” (Flowe, 2011). When it comes to being a creditable source of being an eye witness there are many things that, factor how using someone’s testimony as accountable source. When it comes to linking and eyewitness testimony and the accusing someone under false pretenses there has been amplitude of research that has being placed into forensic psychology to help see how useful resources are when it comes to taking an eyewitness word. “The connection between erroneous eyewitness identification evidence and wrongful convictions has been the motivating force behind much research in forensic psychology” (Wells, 2006). When
“In 1984 Kirk Bloodsworth was convicted of the rape and murder of a nine-year-old girl and sentenced to the gas chamberan outcome that rested largely on the testimony of five eyewitnesses. After Bloodsworth served nine years in prison, DNA testing proved him to be innocent. Such devastating mistakes by eyewitnesses are not rare, according to a report by the Innocence Project, an organization affiliated with the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University that uses DNA testing to exonerate those wrongfully convicted of crimes” (Arkowitz & Lilienfeld, 2010). This is one case of how eyewitnesses can go wrong this was the story of how a man who was wrongly convicted because of someone who was an eyewitness. This story is one of many people who have been prosecuted under false accusations. There are a few things that can contribute to falsely convicting an individual like the witness being under a lot of pressure and stress when trying to properly identify someone. They witness could also be effected if there was any type of trauma or the perpetrator could be wearing a disguise, with a mask fake hair of sunglass that takes way from making identification. Also race can play a major role in what the witness