Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Journal of Operations Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jom
Balancing priorities: Decision-making in sustainable supply chain management
Zhaohui Wu a,∗ , Mark Pagell b,1 a b
Oregon State University, College of Business, 200 Bexell Hall, Corvallis, OR 97331-2603, United States
Schulich School of Business, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 28 June 2008
Received in revised form
27 September 2010
Accepted 25 October 2010
Available online 3 November 2010
Keywords:
Green supply chain management
Decision-making
Sustainability
a b s t r a c t
The need for environmental protection and increasing demands for natural resources are forcing companies to reconsider their business models and restructure their supply chain operations. Scholars and proactive companies have begun to create more sustainable supply chains. What has not been fully addressed is how organizations deal with short-term pressures to remain economically viable while implementing these newly modeled supply chains. In this study, we use theory-building through case studies to answer the question: how do organizations balance short-term profitability and long-term environmental sustainability when making supply chain decisions under conditions of uncertainty? We present five sets of propositions that explain how exemplars in green supply chain management make decisions and balance short and long term objectives. We also identify four environmental postures that help explain the decisions organizations make when dealing with strategic trade-offs among the economic, environmental and social elements of the triple-bottom-line.
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Organizations have begun to examine their supply chains in response to numerous
References: Alvesson, M., 1993. Cultural Perspectives on Organizations. Oxford University Press, New York. Bailey, K.D., 1994. Typologies and Taxonomies: An Introduction to Classification Techniques Boyer, K., Bozarth, C., McDermott, C., 2000. Configurations in operations: an emerging area of study. Journal of Operations Management 18 (6), 601–604. Camerer, C.F., 1998. Behavioral economics and nonrational organizational decision making. In: Halpern, J., Stern, R.N. (Eds.), Debating Rationality: Nonrational Aspects of Organizational Decision Making Chechile, R.A., 1991. Introduction to environmental decision making. In: Chechile, R.A Choi, T.Y., Dooley, K.J., Rungtusanatham, M., 2001. Supply networks and complex adaptive systems: control versus emergence Christmann, P., 2000. Effects of “best practices” of environmental management on cost advantage: the role of complimentary assets Climate Action Partnership, 2010. Retrieved from http://www.us-cap.org/. Corbett, C.J., Kirsch, D.A., 2001. International diffusion of ISO 14000 certification. Corbett, C.J., Klassen, R.D., 2006. Extending the horizons: environmental excellence as key to improving operations Cowell, S.J., Fairman, R., Lofstedt, R.E., 2002. Use of risk assessment and life cycle assessment in decision making: a common policy research agenda Curkovic, S., Melnyk, S.A., Handfield, R.B., Calantone, R., 2000. Investigating the linkage between total quality management and environmentally responsible Curkovic, S., Sroufe, R., Landeros, R., 2008. Measuring TQEM returns from the application of quality frameworks. Business Strategy and the Environment 17 (2), 93–106. Cyert, R.M., March, J.G., 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. Devinney, T.M., 2009. Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of corporate social responsibility Donaldson, T., Preston, L.E., 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review 20 (1), 65–91. Doty, D.H., Glick, W.H., 1994. Typologies as a unique form of theory building: toward improved understanding and modeling Eisenhardt, K., 1989. Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review 14 (4), 532–550. Eisenhardt, K.M., Zbaracki, M.J., 1992. Strategic decisions making. Strategic Management Journal 13 (S2), 17–37. Elkington, J., 1998. Cannibals with Forks: The Triple-bottom-line of 21st Century. Eoyang, G., 1997. Coping with Chaos: Seven Simple Tools. Lagamo Corporation, Cheyenne, Wyoming. Feldman, J.M., Lynch Jr., J.G., 1988. Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention and behavior Fiske, S.T, Taylor, S.E., 1991. Social Cognition, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York. Florida, R., 1996. Lean and green: the move to environmentally conscious manufacturing. California Management Review 39 (1), 80–105. Freeman, R.E., 1984. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston, Massachusetts. Frenken, K., 2001. Understanding Product Innovation Using Complex Systems Theory. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Amsterdam. Glac, K., 2009. Understanding socially responsible investing: the effect of decision frames and trade-off options Gladwin, T.N., Kennelly, J.J., Krause, T.-S., 1995. Shifting paradigms for sustainable development: implications for management theory and research Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L., 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research Guide, V.D.R., Jayaraman, V., Linton, J.D., 2003. Building contingency planning for closed-loop supply chains with product recovery Hall, J., Vredenburg, H., 2003. The challenges of innovating for sustainable development. Sloan Management Review 45 (1), 61–68. Handfield, R.B., Walton, S.V., Seegers, L.K., Melnyk, S.A., 1997. Green value chain practices in the furniture industry Hayes, R.H., Wheelwright, S.G., 1979. Link manufacturing process and product life cycles Hertwich, E.G., Hammitt, J.K., Pease, W.S., 2000. A theoretical foundation for lifecycle assessment: recognizing the role of values in environmental decision making Hoffman, A.J., Gillespie, J.J., Moore, D.A., Wade-Benzoni, K.A., Thompson, L.L., Bazerman, M.H., 1999. A mixed-motive perspective on the economics versus environment debate Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., Tversky, A., 1982. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases Karakayali, I., Emir-Farinas, H., Akcali, E., 2007. An analysis of decentralized collection and processing of end-of-life products. Journal of Operations Management 25 (6), 1161–1183. Kauffman, S., 1993. The Origins of Order. Oxford University Press, Oxford. King, A., Lenox, M., 2001. Lean and green? Exploring the spillovers from lean production to environmental performance. Production and Operations Management 10 (3), 244–256. King, A., Lenox, M., 2002. Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science 48 (2), 289–299. Klassen, R.D., Whybark, D.C., 1999. Environmental management in operations: the selection of environmental technologies Kleindorfer, P.R., Singhal, K., Van Wasssenhove, L.N., 2005. Sustainable operations management. Production and Operations Management 14 (4), 482– 492. Linton, J.D., Klassen, R., Jayaraman, V., 2007. Sustainable supply chains: an introduction. Journal of Operations Management 25 (6), 1075–1082. Margolis, J.D., Elfenbein, H.A., Walsh, J.P., 2007. Does it pay to be good? A meta-analysis and redirection of research on corporate social and financial performance March, J.G., Schulz, M., Zhou, X., 2000. The Dynamics of Rules: Change in Written Organizational Codes March, J.G., Simon, H.A., 1993. Organizations. Blackwell, Oxford.