E. Loftus, 1970 psychologist, launched a research program investigating the impact on event memory of information. He suggested between the time of a witnessed event and the time people are required to testify the information is likely to be distorted. One of his studies he chose to test the memory of witnesses of an automobile crash. He showed test subjects a video of a car crash and asked them questions regarding the speed of which the cars smashed into each other. Though with another half of the group he replaced the word ‘smashed’ with ‘hit.’ The results a week later were staggering. The people in the first group were likely to say ‘yes’ to have seeing broken glass in the film even though that had never happened. In summary, generation, elaboration, and integration of information across individual experiences from different sources reflect such stimulations can overturn memory and complex thought. Though this very capacity of creativity makes us even more so vulnerable for memory distortions.
The most comprehensive account of false memories to date is source monitoring. With source monitoring framework it is shown that memory is attributed by ongoing judgement processes, not by mental experiences.
It can be further highlighted by four key aspects of memory attributions.
One: Various qualitative characteristics are what memory ascribing is based upon. An example would be perceptual, spatial, temporal, or emotional details that are taken as evidence from a mental experience that is a true