Pollan uses scientific facts that's backed up with research to prove his argument that growing obesity needs to be counter with better life choices, “Thirty years of nutritional advice have left us fatter, sicker, and more poorly nourished”(Pollan 81). The studies in his novel tend to be more of a scientific tone for his voice is more sophisticated and blunt then Schlosser. After carefully analysis both of their work i've concluded that although both novels have their strengths, In Defense of food by Michael Pollan make a more compelling argument and forces the audience to think at a greater level. All of his fact of calories needed to be consumed and disease associated with obesity all stem to the main concept of change and how this country especially need to basically, eat less or burn more calories. Nutrient is another interesting point the author addresses, thoroughly, “protein against carbs; carbs against proteins, and then fats; fats against carbs.” (Pollan 30). He elaborates in depth on the key component that the body needs to survive and how much is required for each individual. This components of the novel tend to be one of the main pillar that hold up his argument of the causes of obesity and its harm towards
Pollan uses scientific facts that's backed up with research to prove his argument that growing obesity needs to be counter with better life choices, “Thirty years of nutritional advice have left us fatter, sicker, and more poorly nourished”(Pollan 81). The studies in his novel tend to be more of a scientific tone for his voice is more sophisticated and blunt then Schlosser. After carefully analysis both of their work i've concluded that although both novels have their strengths, In Defense of food by Michael Pollan make a more compelling argument and forces the audience to think at a greater level. All of his fact of calories needed to be consumed and disease associated with obesity all stem to the main concept of change and how this country especially need to basically, eat less or burn more calories. Nutrient is another interesting point the author addresses, thoroughly, “protein against carbs; carbs against proteins, and then fats; fats against carbs.” (Pollan 30). He elaborates in depth on the key component that the body needs to survive and how much is required for each individual. This components of the novel tend to be one of the main pillar that hold up his argument of the causes of obesity and its harm towards