Preview

Father Flynn Innocent

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
572 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Father Flynn Innocent
Madi Landsberger
Mrs. Wenshau
Doubt
Innocent until proven guilty Everyone knows what it is like to be accused of something. In the play doubt written by John Patrick Shanley the reader questions whether or not one of the main characters Father Flynn is innocent or guilty. Father Flynn is accused of sexually harassing a student. The students name is Donald Muller; he is the only African American child at his school. I believe that Father Flynn is innocent. I believe he is innocent. There is plenty of evidence to back up Father Flynn’s innocence, and there is none to prove that he is guilty; therefore I believe he is innocent. Sister Aloysius seems to have it out for father Flynn before she even heard the accusations. Father Flynn unlike
…show more content…

There is no solid evidence to back up sister Aloysius’s belief that father Flynn is guilty. “I have not done anything wrong. I care about that boy very much” -Father Flynn (Shanley, 55) Donald Muller is the only African American in his school, father Flynn recognizes that, he may need some guidance and a helping hand so he helps out. Donald gets caught with wine and Sister Aloysius tries to blame that on Flynn and I believe she is only accusing him of being guilty because she does not like him or what he does and she wants him gone. In the story Father Flynn does quite a few things that make the reader question his innocence, for example he leaves after Sister Aloysius’s calls the nun at the school father Flynn worked at previously. “I did not speak to the pastor, I spoke to one of the nuns” –Sister Aloysius (Shanley, 53) Sister Aloysius did not actually call one of the nuns nor a pastor because she believes if she lies and father Flynn falls for it and leaves then she will have been right, and if it doesn’t work then she is wrong. Sister Aloysius isn’t really giving father Flynn a fair shot because he also could have had a different secret he didn’t want to get out and that is why he left. I believe that Father Flynn is innocent because there is no solid evidence to prove that he is guilty. Flynn does do some things that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    I would now like to look at the opposing side, those that feel police corruption is not present in Steven Avery’s case, or in the United States as a whole. The first article, from ABC News, is entitled Making a Murderer': Is Steven Avery Guilty? A Deeper Look Into Netflix Series. In this article, Ken Kratz, the prosecutor of the case, is interviewed. He discusses that the Netflix documentary leaves out several key pieces of evidence, which prove Steven and Brendan are guilty. The article makes a point in stating that Ken is now a defense attorney. Ken states that the filmmakers left out two key pieces of evidence: the car’s hood latch and the phone calls. DNA from sweat was found on the hood latch of Teresa’s car, and upon testing matched Steven Avery.…

    • 281 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To be able to properly analyze these claims, however, the definitions of an expert and a pure fact must be established. An expert will be defined as someone who is trained or selected to fulfil a particular role. While this definition may be flexible, it encompasses all experts that will be discussed, namely historians, lawyers, and jurors. In the context of this essay, evidence is defined as an undisputable fact which allows for conclusions to be drawn which are disputable.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Presumed Innocent

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Entertainment has always consisted of law related movies. Legal movies are successful because of public interest in different types of legal cases and scenarios. An example of a successful legal movie is Presumed Innocent.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the play he questions the evidence to force the other jurors to think about whether there is any reasonable doubt to vote not guilty. At every opportunity he uses reason and logic to attempt to make the other jurors think about the validity of the evidence. By forcing the trial to continue, this makes the other jurors think about the case and they use their own theories to attempt to make the child “Not Guilty”. As juror 8 states “As far as I know, we’re supposed to decide whether or not the boy on trial is guilty beyond reasonable doubt. We’re not concerned with anyone else’s motives here”. Through the words of juror 8 we can sense the determination from him to discover whether or not the boy is “not guilty beyond reasonable doubt.” He brings his own ideas and does this by fighting against the flawed testimonies of the witnesses. With the many different attitudes of the jurors, this is an appropriate method of persuading as it engages the other jurors to deliberate and discuss without forcing them…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play Twelve Angry Men, a teenaged boy is indicted of committing premeditated murder, the most serious felony tried in the United States justice system. While initially it appears the boy is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, after careful deliberation from the jury, additional evidence surfaces, showing the boy may not be guilty. Additional evidence found led the jurors to impeach the witness’s accounts, due to inconstancies in their testimonies. For these reasons and others I believe the boy was not guilty. For example, one of the most convincing pieces of evidence from the prosecution is an eyewitness account from a woman who saw the boy murder his father from the windows of a passing el train. However, the jurors discover the women’s…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is inevitable that the jurors own personal experiences affect their opinion on the innocence of the defendant. It is these personal experiences, which threaten the defendants right to ‘a fair trial’ at the danger of a juror’s personal bias ‘obscur[ing] the truth.’ Juror 3 is depicted as the juror with the most prejudice throughout the play, consistent with the vote of ‘guilty’ as he relates the defendant to his own son who he describes as a ‘rotten kid.’ This illustrates the danger that personal bias has on the justice system, as the defendant is being adjudicated by juror 3 on his age and gender rather than the merits of the case. Prejudice is also displayed by juror 10 who see’s the accused as ‘trash’ due to his ‘slums’ background, this…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mock Trial

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Greeting courtroom members, I am Shaneka Lewis apart of the Defence Attorney and I will be representing my client Donovan Tisi pleading not guilty upon the robbery and bodily harm charges. On December 5th 2013 at 5:30 PM, Anver Williams had claimed to be walking home from his basketball practice where he perhaps had been wearing his brand new basketball sneakers. As Mr. Williams was walking home he decided to take a short-cut home from a dark alley way that leads to Eglinton Ave. As Anver Williams was walking he seemed to come across a group of older men. Anver Williams explained how the young men approached him and toke away his hat and his sneakers after while being brutally attacked. My question and argument court, is to why my client Donovan is being called upon out of all of the young men who had claimed to be there during this dispute, is there enough proof or evidence to show that Donovan Tisi had been there or even took part in this crime, that Anver Williams is not sure of who had harmed or robbed him? As we are gathered here court I would like you all to investigate or try to find real evidence to prove that it had been my client Donovan that shows his participation in this act.…

    • 1085 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Danforth In The Crucible

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Danforth’s stubborn demeanor controls most of his accusations and influences his decisions. He truly believes that the only way to prove there is witchcraft is if the victim accuses the assailant. However, there is a serious flaw in this method. Anyone can make an accusation and no one will be the wiser as to if they are lying. When Proctor comes into the court to give evidence of the girls lies, he accuses Danforth of not using evidence. Danforth tells Proctor if people are accused of being witches then it’s “Ipso facto” and they are guilty (103). Francis Nurse then gives a petition to Danforth. Instead of looking at it as evidence he tells Hathorne to “arrest for examination” the 91 names on the petition (97). Danforth cannot think of the girls as a lie because his behavior prevents him.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    He does not assist anyone in any way. Jewel, and Tull are risking their lives going back in the water to retrieve Cash’s tools, and he is acting like nothing is happening. This shows how unfather-like he is, and how he thinks he is entitled to do nothing since he is the father, and should be leading, but is actually being a dreadful father. With all his imperfections as a father, his children see him as an unloyal person, and show no respect for him anymore. On top of Dewey Dell’s father betraying the family, Addie, her mother, is also at fault for committing acts of betrayal. Addie, for example, is a character who betrays her other kids in the novel, including Dewey Dell. Addie betrays the whole family by making her other children do Jewel’s work when he is “sick”. They later find out that Jewel is so tired all the time because he would leave at night and go work for Mr. Quick in order to buy his new horse, not for the reasons they thought. Addie, in trying to help relieve Jewel a little bit, makes Dewey Dell and Vardaman do his work for him. Darl recounts Addie at this time: “It was ma that got Dewey Dell to do his…

    • 1815 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    12 Angry Men Essay

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the book “12 Angry Men” by Reginald Rose, a verdict of not guilty was given to the boy after the fact that apparently all the jurors except one thought that the boy was guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. All of the key evidence presented in the court was rejected by the jury, which led the jurors to have a reasonable doubt about the boy’s guiltiness. This evidence in the book will go by chronological order and support why there is a reasonable doubt that would lead each juror to change their view of the case. In my opinion some of the counter evidence presented was kind of weak, but the whole point of this essay is to show the trail of evidence to lead the jurors to a reasonable doubt.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘If, however, there is no reasonable doubt –then you must, in good conscience, find the accused guilty’. (Judge)…

    • 761 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police are investigating the theft of computers from the company's offices. Archibald, Cuthbert, Montgomery, and Sherlock are arrested as suspects. The confessions police acquired are as follows: Archibald said "Montgomery did it." Cuthbert said "Sherlock stole it." Montgomery said "if I did it, then Sherlock would be the principle criminal." Sherlock said "I didn't do it." Police knows one of the confessions is false.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Habib

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Demonstrates a fixed and cynical view of family relationships. Funny as it opposes men and woman as if they both grow up opposed direction, but none of them are right. Woman should not become like their mothers although they do, whereas men should become like their mothers but they don’t.…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essential evidence that invalidates Jameson’s accusations is Portia’s manipulative mindset when the topic of who she will marry comes into the scene. Instead of following her father’s will which accepted fate as the deciding factor on who she will marry; she wants to independently choose a man to marry. Portia never actually performs any acts that go against her father’s will, but she gives hints to ideas of scheming her way in an effort to finding the right suitor. When Portia…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Page 193 line 40-41: “And he was afraid, too, that they would blame him for the wrong turning his boy had taken.”…

    • 1291 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays